Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
181,686 studies31 sourcesUpdated 5 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0The European Journal of Public Health

The cost of health risk factors: quantifying the potential health and economic returns of prevention

Abstract

Background: Population exposure to modifiable risk factors in Poland remains above the EU average, generating substantial health losses, healthcare costs, and economic inefficiencies. Yet prevention is rarely evaluated through a cross-sector lens. This study presents a framework to quantify the societal returns of reducing risk factor exposure, translating epidemiological effects into outcomes relevant for patients, healthcare systems, and the economy.

Methods: We apply a comparative risk assessment approach using the Potential Impact Fractions to simulate counterfactual scenarios of reduced exposure to key risk factors - tobacco, alcohol, obesity, low physical activity, unhealthy diet, and PM2.5. Baseline exposure (2024) and relative risks were linked to ICD-10 outcomes. Impacts were measured as avoided healthcare costs (payer perspective), reduced absenteeism/productivity gains (human capital approach), and premature mortality reductions.

Results: Obesity reduction yielded the largest annual healthcare savings (up to 2.1bn PLN), followed by smoking and unhealthy diet. The greatest absenteeism reductions were observed for obesity (up to 3.3M days), smoking, and PM2.5. From a patient perspective, the largest mortality reductions were linked to decreased smoking (up to 56.4k deaths), increased physical activity, and reduced air pollution. These findings highlight the scale of avoidable burden associated with current exposure levels and demonstrate significant returns for the patient, the healthcare system and the economy achievable through prevention.

Conclusions: This framework integrates epidemiological and economic evidence to frame health promotion as a high-value investment. By highlighting population-wide burdens, it provides a transparent tool to align resources allocation with health and economic gains, strengthening the case for cross-sector action and equity-oriented prevention.

Key messages: • This versatile tool uses impact fractions to simulate risk facotr reduction, translating into health gains, healthcare savings and increased economic productivity.

• Tackling key risks by cutting obesity and substances use saves lives, boosts productivity, and drives the economy through significant fiscal savings.

Related

  1. Modeling the potential clinical and economic impact of clesrovimab for the prevention of RSV in infants in England and Wales
    Klodeta Kura, Colleen Burgess, Ian R. Matthews +5
    Therapeutic Advances in Infectious DiseasePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textEpidemiology & public healthPMC
  2. Health behavior profiles and potential support needs among community residents with clustered cardiovascular risk factors: a latent profile and explainable machine learning analysis for community-based prevention
    Kaihe Li, Xinyi Yan, Ying Zhou +5
    BMC Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEpidemiology & public healthPMC
  3. Viral Hepatitis, Potential Aflatoxin B1 Exposure, and Projected Metabolic Risk Factors for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Somalia: A Call for Integrated Prevention, Surveillance, and Research.
    Anisa Abdullahi Ibrahim
    Journal of hepatocellular carcinomaPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Surgical Antimicrobial Prophylaxis: Clinical and Economic Impacts on Surgical Site Infection Prevention and Healthcare System Sustainability.
    Marta Francisca de Fátima Fragoso, Jorge Rufino Ribas Timi, Aline da Silva Paula +2
    Infectious disease reportsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMC
  5. Economic Impact of Healthcare Associated Infections (HAI) Prevention Across Surgical Units
    M G Cacciuttolo, M L Specchia, M Bonacquisti +2
    The European Journal of Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textSurgery & anaesthesiaPMCEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{michalowski2026cost,
  title = {{The cost of health risk factors: quantifying the potential health and economic returns of prevention}},
  author = {JC Michałowski and M Raczyńska and S Torzecka and M Wasążnik and B Więckowska and M Dąbkowska},
  journal = {The European Journal of Public Health},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.331},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.331},
  note = {CC BY-NC 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - The cost of health risk factors: quantifying the potential health and economic returns of prevention
AU  - JC Michałowski
AU  - M Raczyńska
AU  - S Torzecka
AU  - M Wasążnik
AU  - B Więckowska
AU  - M Dąbkowska
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/01
JO  - The European Journal of Public Health
DO  - 10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.331
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.331
AB  - Background: Population exposure to modifiable risk factors in Poland remains above the EU average, generating substantial health losses, healthcare costs, and economic inefficiencies. Yet prevention is rarely evaluated through a cross-sector lens. This study presents a framework to quantify the societal returns of reducing risk factor exposure, translating epidemiological effects into outcomes relevant for patients, healthcare systems, and the economy.  Methods: We apply a comparative risk assessment approach using the Potential Impact Fractions to simulate counterfactual scenarios of reduced exposure to key risk factors - tobacco, alcohol, obesity, low physical activity, unhealthy diet, and PM2.5. Baseline exposure (2024) and relative risks were linked to ICD-10 outcomes. Impacts were measured as avoided healthcare costs (payer perspective), reduced absenteeism/productivity gains (human capital approach), and premature mortality reductions.  Results: Obesity reduction yielded the largest annual healthcare savings (up to 2.1bn PLN), followed by smoking and unhealthy diet. The greatest absenteeism reductions were observed for obesity (up to 3.3M days), smoking, and PM2.5. From a patient perspective, the largest mortality reductions were linked to decreased smoking (up to 56.4k deaths), increased physical activity, and reduced air pollution. These findings highlight the scale of avoidable burden associated with current exposure levels and demonstrate significant returns for the patient, the healthcare system and the economy achievable through prevention.  Conclusions: This framework integrates epidemiological and economic evidence to frame health promotion as a high-value investment. By highlighting population-wide burdens, it provides a transparent tool to align resources allocation with health and economic gains, strengthening the case for cross-sector action and equity-oriented prevention.  Key messages: • This versatile tool uses impact fractions to simulate risk facotr reduction, translating into health gains, healthcare savings and increased economic productivity.  • Tackling key risks by cutting obesity and substances use saves lives, boosts productivity, and drives the economy through significant fiscal savings.
SN  - 1101-1262
SN  - 1464-360X
ER  -