Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
189,105 studies31 sourcesUpdated 15 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Limits on Kinematic Inference from the PURSUE Airborne Sensor Videos

Abstract

This paper analyzes the 112 sensor videos released under the PURSUE (Presidential Unsealing and Reporting System for UAP Encounters) initiative. Redactions to on-screen displays limit information available for identifying the reported unidentified anomalous phenomena (UAP). Converting the rate at which any object transits across part or all of a frame from pixels per frame to a physical velocity requires (1) the range to the object, (2) the velocity of the observing aircraft, (3) the aspect angle between the object's path and observer, and (4) the field angle of the camera. No PURSUE video provides this set of information. In one clip (DOW-UAP-PR113), the object crosses depression-angle markings, which allows reconstruction of the camera's field of view. Even this clip does not provide sufficient information to distinguish between a bird flying at close range and a large craft traveling at Mach 5 a kilometer away. A second clip (DOW-UAP-PR149) includes a vessel of known size in the frame, which can be used as a reference to calculate an upper bound of Mach 0.4 on the object's relative velocity. Without further information, the PURSUE sensor videos in their present form cannot fully resolve unidentified cases or conclusively indicate anomalous velocities.

Related

  1. The method of kinematic limits in high-energy physics
    A. V. Bobrov
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textHigh-energy & particle physicsarXiv
  2. Adaptive sensing beyond non-adaptive information limits: End-to-end co-design of geometry, policy, and inference
    Arvin Keshvari, William Tuxbury, Zin Lin
    Physical Review ResearchPeer-reviewedPublisher termsAtomic, molecular & optical physicsCrossref
  3. Physics-Guided Concentration Inference from Resistance Transients in a Mixed-Phase SnO-SnO2 Carbon Monoxide Sensor with p-n Switching
    Sani Biswas, Preetam Singh, Amit Kumar Gangwar
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textPhysical chemistryApplied physics & instrumentationarXiv
  4. Calorimetry as inference: the information content of particle showers and the limits of energy measurement
    Wonyong Chung
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textApplied physics & instrumentationHigh-energy & particle physicsarXiv
  5. Dynamic calibration method for the system constant of high-spectral-resolution lidar with airborne experimental verification
    Li Ping, Fanqian Meng, Juxin yang +3
    Optics ExpressPeer-reviewedLicence not statedOptics & photonicsCrossref
BibTeX
@misc{haqqmisra2026limits,
  title = {{Limits on Kinematic Inference from the PURSUE Airborne Sensor Videos}},
  author = {Jacob Haqq-Misra and Ravi Kopparapu},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = aug,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2608.12445},
  eprint = {2608.12445},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.12445},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Limits on Kinematic Inference from the PURSUE Airborne Sensor Videos
AU  - Jacob Haqq-Misra
AU  - Ravi Kopparapu
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/08/28
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2608.12445
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.12445
AB  - This paper analyzes the 112 sensor videos released under the PURSUE (Presidential Unsealing and Reporting System for UAP Encounters) initiative. Redactions to on-screen displays limit information available for identifying the reported unidentified anomalous phenomena (UAP). Converting the rate at which any object transits across part or all of a frame from pixels per frame to a physical velocity requires (1) the range to the object, (2) the velocity of the observing aircraft, (3) the aspect angle between the object's path and observer, and (4) the field angle of the camera. No PURSUE video provides this set of information. In one clip (DOW-UAP-PR113), the object crosses depression-angle markings, which allows reconstruction of the camera's field of view. Even this clip does not provide sufficient information to distinguish between a bird flying at close range and a large craft traveling at Mach 5 a kilometer away. A second clip (DOW-UAP-PR149) includes a vessel of known size in the frame, which can be used as a reference to calculate an upper bound of Mach 0.4 on the object's relative velocity. Without further information, the PURSUE sensor videos in their present form cannot fully resolve unidentified cases or conclusively indicate anomalous velocities.
ER  -