Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 33 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYCognitive Neurodynamics

Linguistics and human brain: a perspective of computational neuroscience

  1. 1Department of Language Science and Technology, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR China
  2. 2Institute of AI and Robotics, College of Intelligent Robotics and Advanced Manufacturing, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200433 China
  3. 3Department of Computing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR China

Abstract

Elucidating the language-brain relationship requires bridging the methodological gap between linguistics' abstract theoretical frameworks and neuroscience's empirical neural data. As an interdisciplinary cornerstone, computational neuroscience formalizes language's hierarchical and dynamic structures into testable neural representation models through modeling, simulation, and data analysis, enabling computational dialogue between linguistic hypotheses and neural mechanisms. Recent advances in deep learning, particularly large language models (LLMs), have further advanced this inquiry: their high-dimensional representational spaces provide a new scale for probing the neural basis of linguistic processing, the model-brain alignment framework offers a principled approach to evaluating the biological plausibility of language-related theories, provided that representational correspondence is interpreted together with behavioral, temporal, causal, and biological constraints. This review synthesizes interdisciplinary progress from a computational neuroscience perspective. First, it outlines the core connotations of major linguistic frameworks (generative grammar, functional linguistics, and cognitive linguistics), their cross-cultural and evolutionary characteristics, and key challenges for neural alignment, including limited quantitative mechanisms, poor accessibility of abstract constructs to neural measures, and insufficient treatment of dynamics and plasticity. Second, it introduces the methodological foundations of linguistics-neuroscience dialogue, focusing on four technical pillars: neural activity measurement (e.g., fMRI, EEG, MEG, fNIRS, ECoG, SEEG), linguistic numerical representation, the evolution of language models from statistical approaches to LLMs, and neural coding frameworks that link model representations to brain signals, illustrated with a model-brain alignment case study. Third, it summarizes major findings, ranging from early computational insights into predictability and structural processing to recent LLM-driven progress in cross-modal interaction, inter-brain coupling, hierarchical computation, learning strategy sensitivity, and language plasticity. Finally, the review discusses current limitations-including functional alignment without structural homology, constraints on real-time validation, biased research coverage, and narrow evaluation metrics-and proposes future directions, such as exploring whether spiking neural network-based language models can improve biological plausibility in settings requiring temporally precise and event-driven neural modeling, developing cognitive-level alignment frameworks integrating memory, causality, and metacognition, and extending clinical applications. In summary, this work aims to advance a comprehensive, mechanistic understanding of the language-brain relationship and promote computational neuroscience as a generative theoretical framework for testable neuro-computational accounts of language.

Related

  1. Personality beyond the brain: a new perspective on the brain-gut-gonadal axis and human fertility.
    Bogdan Doroftei, Ahmed Adel Mansour Kamar, Alin Ciobica +4
    Frontiers in behavioral neurosciencePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textNeuroscienceEurope PMCPMC
  2. Prior knowledge reveals two computational regimes for syntactic processing in the human brain
    C. Iaia, A. Tavano
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textNeurosciencebioRxiv
  3. Ten simple rules for achieving computational reproducibility in cognitive neuroscience
    Gaurav Mahajan, Caroline J Charpentier, Valentin Guigon
    PsyArXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textNeuroscienceOSF
  4. Neuromorphic architectures as numerical solvers for computational neuroscience
    Jakob Jordan, Ole Richter, Congyang Li +2
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textBioinformatics & computational biologyarXiv
  5. Looking Closely at the Human Experience: Visual Art–Based Exercises in Preclinical Neuroscience Education
    Tamara B. Kaplan, Michael Stanley, Christine M. Bentley +1
    Medical Science EducatorPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull textNeurosciencePMC
BibTeX
@article{zhang2026linguistics,
  title = {{Linguistics and human brain: a perspective of computational neuroscience}},
  author = {Fudong Zhang and Bo Chai and Yujie Wu and Wai Ting Siok and Nizhuan Wang},
  journal = {Cognitive Neurodynamics},
  year = {2026},
  month = jul,
  doi = {10.1007/s11571-026-10496-2},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s11571-026-10496-2},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Linguistics and human brain: a perspective of computational neuroscience
AU  - Fudong Zhang
AU  - Bo Chai
AU  - Yujie Wu
AU  - Wai Ting Siok
AU  - Nizhuan Wang
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/07/08
JO  - Cognitive Neurodynamics
DO  - 10.1007/s11571-026-10496-2
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1007/s11571-026-10496-2
AB  - Elucidating the language-brain relationship requires bridging the methodological gap between linguistics' abstract theoretical frameworks and neuroscience's empirical neural data. As an interdisciplinary cornerstone, computational neuroscience formalizes language's hierarchical and dynamic structures into testable neural representation models through modeling, simulation, and data analysis, enabling computational dialogue between linguistic hypotheses and neural mechanisms. Recent advances in deep learning, particularly large language models (LLMs), have further advanced this inquiry: their high-dimensional representational spaces provide a new scale for probing the neural basis of linguistic processing, the model-brain alignment framework offers a principled approach to evaluating the biological plausibility of language-related theories, provided that representational correspondence is interpreted together with behavioral, temporal, causal, and biological constraints. This review synthesizes interdisciplinary progress from a computational neuroscience perspective. First, it outlines the core connotations of major linguistic frameworks (generative grammar, functional linguistics, and cognitive linguistics), their cross-cultural and evolutionary characteristics, and key challenges for neural alignment, including limited quantitative mechanisms, poor accessibility of abstract constructs to neural measures, and insufficient treatment of dynamics and plasticity. Second, it introduces the methodological foundations of linguistics-neuroscience dialogue, focusing on four technical pillars: neural activity measurement (e.g., fMRI, EEG, MEG, fNIRS, ECoG, SEEG), linguistic numerical representation, the evolution of language models from statistical approaches to LLMs, and neural coding frameworks that link model representations to brain signals, illustrated with a model-brain alignment case study. Third, it summarizes major findings, ranging from early computational insights into predictability and structural processing to recent LLM-driven progress in cross-modal interaction, inter-brain coupling, hierarchical computation, learning strategy sensitivity, and language plasticity. Finally, the review discusses current limitations-including functional alignment without structural homology, constraints on real-time validation, biased research coverage, and narrow evaluation metrics-and proposes future directions, such as exploring whether spiking neural network-based language models can improve biological plausibility in settings requiring temporally precise and event-driven neural modeling, developing cognitive-level alignment frameworks integrating memory, causality, and metacognition, and extending clinical applications. In summary, this work aims to advance a comprehensive, mechanistic understanding of the language-brain relationship and promote computational neuroscience as a generative theoretical framework for testable neuro-computational accounts of language.
SN  - 1871-4080
SN  - 1871-4099
ER  -