Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 43 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDJTCVS open

Comparison of the performance of clinical classification systems for myasthenia gravis relapse after thymoma resection.

5 affiliations
  1. 1Department of Thoracic Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
  2. 2Fujian Key Laboratory of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
  3. 3State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
  4. 4Department of Thoracic Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
  5. 5Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.

Abstract

Objective

To characterize clinically significant myasthenia gravis (MG) relapse/exacerbation after thymoma resection and compare classification systems for risk stratification.Methods

This multicenter retrospective cohort included 257 patients with thymoma-associated MG who underwent extended thymectomy at 3 centers from July 2009 through November 2025. The end point was new MG symptoms after postoperative complete stable remission, pharmacologic remission, or minimal manifestation status plus verifiable MG-related treatment escalation or rescue therapy. Death without MG relapse/exacerbation was treated as a competing event. Cumulative incidence functions were estimated with Aalen-Johansen and compared with Gray tests; predictors were assessed with Fine-Gray models.Results

During median follow-up of 41.6 months, 69 relapse/exacerbation events and 21 competing deaths occurred. Cumulative incidence was 20.4% at 3 years and 29.0% at 5 years; 68% and 90% of events occurred within 3 and 5 years, respectively. Among 52 relapse/exacerbation events in patients who underwent surgery in 2018 or later with retrievable treatment-status data, 28 (53.8%) occurred during ongoing immunosuppression and 24 (46.2%) after withdrawal. The a/b phenotype-based grouping of the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America classification (1/A/B) showed the strongest separation (3-year cumulative incidences, 2.5%, 12.3%, and 56.4%; 5-year cumulative incidences, 7.6%, 29.6%, and 56.4% for groups 1, A, and B). Groups A and B were independently associated with relapse/exacerbation (subdistribution hazard ratio, 2.65; 95% CI, 1.18-5.91; and 10.55; 95% CI, 4.55-24.47).Conclusions

Clinically significant MG relapse/exacerbation after thymoma resection clustered in the early postoperative years. The a/b phenotype-based grouping of the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America classification (1/A/B) provided the most informative risk stratification.

Related

  1. High performance white blood cell classification using ensemble CNNs with Monte Carlo dropout and conformal prediction for clinical uncertainty quantification
    Shahid Mehmood, Abeer A. K. Alharbi, Mona Alkhattabi +2
    Frontiers in MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral medicinePMCEurope PMC
  2. Commentary: Efgartigimod for generalized myasthenia gravis: a comprehensive review of clinical evidence and future perspectives
    Ana Belén Fernández
    Frontiers in NeurologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeurologyCrossrefPMC
  3. From Rescue Therapy to Mechanism-Based Sequencing in Refractory Myasthenia Gravis: A Narrative Review with an Illustrative Clinical Case
    Journal of clinical medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Clinical events and health care costs among pediatric and young adult patients with generalized myasthenia gravis in the United States
    Jacqueline Pesa, Zhiwen Liu, Louis Jackson +1
    Journal of Managed Care & Specialty PharmacyPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull textNeurologyPMC
  5. Comparison between mono-tacrolimus and mono-prednisone in the treatment of ocular myasthenia gravis: a retrospective, observational cohort study
    Ziling Wang, Jinna Li, Zhelu Fan +10
    Frontiers in ImmunologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeurologyCrossrefEurope PMCPMC
BibTeX
@article{yao2026comparison,
  title = {{Comparison of the performance of clinical classification systems for myasthenia gravis relapse after thymoma resection.}},
  author = {Zhiheng Yao and Hongmu Li and Zhenyuan Yang and Yu Huang and Leqi Zhong and Zhenyu Zhao and Yiling Cai and Chun Chen and Bin Zheng},
  journal = {JTCVS open},
  year = {2026},
  month = aug,
  doi = {10.1016/j.xjon.2026.101980},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42948408},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Comparison of the performance of clinical classification systems for myasthenia gravis relapse after thymoma resection.
AU  - Zhiheng Yao
AU  - Hongmu Li
AU  - Zhenyuan Yang
AU  - Yu Huang
AU  - Leqi Zhong
AU  - Zhenyu Zhao
AU  - Yiling Cai
AU  - Chun Chen
AU  - Bin Zheng
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/08/22
JO  - JTCVS open
DO  - 10.1016/j.xjon.2026.101980
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42948408
AB  - Objective  To characterize clinically significant myasthenia gravis (MG) relapse/exacerbation after thymoma resection and compare classification systems for risk stratification.Methods  This multicenter retrospective cohort included 257 patients with thymoma-associated MG who underwent extended thymectomy at 3 centers from July 2009 through November 2025. The end point was new MG symptoms after postoperative complete stable remission, pharmacologic remission, or minimal manifestation status plus verifiable MG-related treatment escalation or rescue therapy. Death without MG relapse/exacerbation was treated as a competing event. Cumulative incidence functions were estimated with Aalen-Johansen and compared with Gray tests; predictors were assessed with Fine-Gray models.Results  During median follow-up of 41.6 months, 69 relapse/exacerbation events and 21 competing deaths occurred. Cumulative incidence was 20.4% at 3 years and 29.0% at 5 years; 68% and 90% of events occurred within 3 and 5 years, respectively. Among 52 relapse/exacerbation events in patients who underwent surgery in 2018 or later with retrievable treatment-status data, 28 (53.8%) occurred during ongoing immunosuppression and 24 (46.2%) after withdrawal. The a/b phenotype-based grouping of the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America classification (1/A/B) showed the strongest separation (3-year cumulative incidences, 2.5%, 12.3%, and 56.4%; 5-year cumulative incidences, 7.6%, 29.6%, and 56.4% for groups 1, A, and B). Groups A and B were independently associated with relapse/exacerbation (subdistribution hazard ratio, 2.65; 95% CI, 1.18-5.91; and 10.55; 95% CI, 4.55-24.47).Conclusions  Clinically significant MG relapse/exacerbation after thymoma resection clustered in the early postoperative years. The a/b phenotype-based grouping of the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America classification (1/A/B) provided the most informative risk stratification.
SN  - 2666-2736
ER  -