Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
194,161 studies31 sourcesUpdated 26 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Frontiers in Medicine

High performance white blood cell classification using ensemble CNNs with Monte Carlo dropout and conformal prediction for clinical uncertainty quantification

5 affiliations
  1. 1Department of Computer Science, Bahria University, Lahore, Pakistan
  2. 2Faculty of Computing, Riphah International University, Islamabad, Pakistan
  3. 3Information Systems Department, College of Computer and Information Sciences, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  4. 4Department of Software, Faculty of Artificial Intelligence and Software, Gachon University, Seongnam-si, Republic of Korea
  5. 5Faculty of Computer and Mathematical Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia

Abstract

Automated classification of white blood cell (WBC) images may support cell-morphology workflows, but high accuracy alone does not establish clinical readiness. We developed an Uncertainty-Guided Deep Ensemble (UGDE) combining MobileNetV3-Large, EfficientNet-B0, and ShuffleNetV2 with Monte Carlo dropout, temperature scaling, split conformal prediction, and Grad-CAM. The primary dataset contained 16,027 single-cell images from 78 patients (33 with leukemia and 45 without leukemia). All stated development partitions were grouped by patient, and augmentation was restricted to the proper training subset. On the held-out internal test set (3,205 images from 16 patients), UGDE achieved approximately 99% image-level accuracy and macro-F1 of 0.99. Expected calibration error was 2.3% before and 0.8% after temperature scaling. Internal empirical conformal coverage was 94.2%, 89.7%, and 79.7% at nominal coverage levels of 95%, 90%, and 80%, respectively; these slight shortfalls are reported without claiming that the targets were met. External evaluation used 2000 Raabin-WBC images after mapping the nine model outputs to five shared leukocyte categories and yielded 94% descriptive accuracy. Grad-CAM examples were used as post-hoc visualizations and were not interpreted as causal explanations. These retrospective results support further evaluation of uncertainty-aware WBC image classification, but they do not demonstrate performance on whole slides, automated differential counts, prospective patients, or clinical workflows.

Related

  1. Uncertainty Quantification for Aquatic Ecotoxicity Prediction
    Tadeusz Price, Oliver Urs Lenz, Markus Viljanen +1
    ChemRxivPreprintCC BYFull textPharmacology & toxicologyChemRxiv
  2. CP-BayesNE: Uncertainty-Aware Personalized Nutrient-Density Estimation from Food Images Using Conformal Prediction and Prior-Corrected Dietary Adaptation
    Zhaozhen Tong, Kumiko Ono, Shu-Chun Lee +3
    NutrientsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0NutritionCrossref
  3. Uncertainty-Aware Multiscale Treatment Response Forecasting in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Using Residual-Variance Conformal Prediction
    S. Wang, L. Deng, T. Ye +4
    medRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textEpidemiology & public healthmedRxiv
  4. Uncertainty-aware estimation of compressive strength for fly ash concrete with enhanced probabilistic prediction performance by incorporating the associated mortar strength
    Ping Chen, Cheng Li, Ao Li +5
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textGeneral medicineCrossrefDOAJ
  5. Nondimensionalization, Variational Inequalities and Uncertainty Quantification in a Morphoelastic Model for Burn Injury Healing
    Wilbert den Hertog, Fred Vermolen
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textNumerical analysis & scientific computingPhysiologyarXiv
BibTeX
@article{mehmood2026high,
  title = {{High performance white blood cell classification using ensemble CNNs with Monte Carlo dropout and conformal prediction for clinical uncertainty quantification}},
  author = {Shahid Mehmood and Abeer A. K. Alharbi and Mona Alkhattabi and Muhammad Adnan Khan and Muhammad Amir Khan},
  journal = {Frontiers in Medicine},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3389/fmed.2026.1959061},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2026.1959061},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - High performance white blood cell classification using ensemble CNNs with Monte Carlo dropout and conformal prediction for clinical uncertainty quantification
AU  - Shahid Mehmood
AU  - Abeer A. K. Alharbi
AU  - Mona Alkhattabi
AU  - Muhammad Adnan Khan
AU  - Muhammad Amir Khan
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/12
JO  - Frontiers in Medicine
DO  - 10.3389/fmed.2026.1959061
UR  - https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2026.1959061
AB  - Automated classification of white blood cell (WBC) images may support cell-morphology workflows, but high accuracy alone does not establish clinical readiness. We developed an Uncertainty-Guided Deep Ensemble (UGDE) combining MobileNetV3-Large, EfficientNet-B0, and ShuffleNetV2 with Monte Carlo dropout, temperature scaling, split conformal prediction, and Grad-CAM. The primary dataset contained 16,027 single-cell images from 78 patients (33 with leukemia and 45 without leukemia). All stated development partitions were grouped by patient, and augmentation was restricted to the proper training subset. On the held-out internal test set (3,205 images from 16 patients), UGDE achieved approximately 99% image-level accuracy and macro-F1 of 0.99. Expected calibration error was 2.3% before and 0.8% after temperature scaling. Internal empirical conformal coverage was 94.2%, 89.7%, and 79.7% at nominal coverage levels of 95%, 90%, and 80%, respectively; these slight shortfalls are reported without claiming that the targets were met. External evaluation used 2000 Raabin-WBC images after mapping the nine model outputs to five shared leukocyte categories and yielded 94% descriptive accuracy. Grad-CAM examples were used as post-hoc visualizations and were not interpreted as causal explanations. These retrospective results support further evaluation of uncertainty-aware WBC image classification, but they do not demonstrate performance on whole slides, automated differential counts, prospective patients, or clinical workflows.
SN  - 2296-858X
ER  -