Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 35 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDJournal of family medicine and primary care

Comparative analysis of adenosine deaminase (ADA) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR/GeneXpert) for diagnosing pleural and peritoneal tuberculosis

7 affiliations
  1. 1General Internal Medicine, Altnagelvin Hospital, Western Health and Social Care Trust, Derry, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom
  2. 2Community Medicine, St. Peter's Medical College, Hospital & Research Institute, Hosur, Tamil Nadu, India
  3. 3Department of Community Medicine, Madha Medical College and Research Institute, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
  4. 4International Faculty of Medicine, Tbilisi State Medical University, Tbilisi, Georgia
  5. 5Department of Internal Medicine, Madras Medical College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
  6. 6Department of Physiology, Mahatma Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Sevagram, Wardha, Maharashtra, India
  7. 7Department of Research, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Sawangi, Maharashtra, India

Abstract

Context:: Tuberculosis (Tb) is one the most prevalent diseases, with a huge disease burden in various developing countries, such as India. Given the large burden of TB cases, the proportion of extrapulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB) cases has also risen in recent years. The diagnosis of EPTB poses a significant challenge, owing to its atypical characteristics. Adenosine deaminase (ADA) and GeneXpert/PCR (NAAT) are the primary tools for EPTB diagnosis currently in practice. The aim of the study was to contrast and highlight the efficacy of the two tests, investigating the utility of both, alone and in combination.

Methods and Material:: This study was a cross-sectional comparative study with a total of 77 samples included. Every diagnosis was documented to generate the values based on predictive power, which include sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV).

Results:: In all the samples, ADA was first compared to GeneXpert in ascitic fluid (sensitivity 75%, specificity 6.9%, PPV 10% and NPV of 66.67%) and in pleural fluid (sensitivity 94.11%, specificity 3.70%, PPV 38.09% and NPV 50%). GeneXpert compared to ADA in ascitic fluid (sensitivity 10%, specificity 66.67%, and PPV 75%, and NPV 6.89%) and in pleural fluid (sensitivity 38.10%, specificity 50%, PPV 94.12% and NPV 3.70%).

Conclusions:: ADA can be used with relative confidence to test EPTB, due to its high sensitivity as well as reliable negative predictive value, in contrast GeneXpert/PCR is strongly recommended in the detection of pre-existing Tb cases, due to its high specificity. Further studies and investigations are required to help health care providers establish the collective use reducing both morbidity and mortality. This study reinforces the use of ADA in cases of EPTB.

Related

  1. Disciform Keratitis That Improves With Poly(Adenosine Diphosphate-Ribose) Polymerase Inhibitor Treatment for Ovarian Cancer but Recurs Upon Discontinuation of Treatment
    Atsuki Fukushima, Shintaro Kohno, Hitoshi Tabuchi
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Peritoneal Tuberculosis and Chronic Myeloid Leukaemia: A Case of Hickam's Dictum
    Zayn Al‐Timimi, Gem Chew, Martin Browne +1
    The Medical Journal of AustraliaPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textInfectious diseasePMC
  3. Performance of ultra-sensitive electrochemiluminescence LAM assay for diagnosing tuberculosis in HIV-negative individuals: a multicentre, prospective diagnostic study
    Yuanyuan Shang, Jiachang Zhang, Wenli Cao +11
    InfectionPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full text1 citedInfectious diseasePMC
  4. Diagnosing asymptomatic tuberculosis: current approaches, emerging tools, and persistent challenges
    Mao-Shui Wang, Dong-Yan Wei, Dong-Yan Wei +2
    Frontiers in Cellular and Infection MicrobiologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textInfectious diseaseDOAJ
  5. Recurrent gene conversions and subcluster-specific variants are associated with Mycobacterium tuberculosis adaptation to intensive host pressure: a comparative genomic study
    Tianyu Lin, Kun Chen, Zhenchun Chen +2
    Frontiers in MicrobiologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textInfectious diseaseCrossrefEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{nair2026comparative,
  title = {{Comparative analysis of adenosine deaminase (ADA) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR/GeneXpert) for diagnosing pleural and peritoneal tuberculosis}},
  author = {Aparnna Unnikrishnan Nair and Sanjana Laishram and Shoraf Pascal and Muskan Joshi and Gayathri Pramil Menon and Lakshmi Murugesan and Nithila Sivakumar and Lakshiya Ramamoorthy and Ruchi Kothari and Roshan Prasad and A Prashanth},
  journal = {Journal of family medicine and primary care},
  year = {2026},
  month = jul,
  doi = {10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1204_24},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13722222},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Comparative analysis of adenosine deaminase (ADA) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR/GeneXpert) for diagnosing pleural and peritoneal tuberculosis
AU  - Aparnna Unnikrishnan Nair
AU  - Sanjana Laishram
AU  - Shoraf Pascal
AU  - Muskan Joshi
AU  - Gayathri Pramil Menon
AU  - Lakshmi Murugesan
AU  - Nithila Sivakumar
AU  - Lakshiya Ramamoorthy
AU  - Ruchi Kothari
AU  - Roshan Prasad
AU  - A Prashanth
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/07/01
JO  - Journal of family medicine and primary care
DO  - 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1204_24
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13722222
AB  - Context:: Tuberculosis (Tb) is one the most prevalent diseases, with a huge disease burden in various developing countries, such as India. Given the large burden of TB cases, the proportion of extrapulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB) cases has also risen in recent years. The diagnosis of EPTB poses a significant challenge, owing to its atypical characteristics. Adenosine deaminase (ADA) and GeneXpert/PCR (NAAT) are the primary tools for EPTB diagnosis currently in practice. The aim of the study was to contrast and highlight the efficacy of the two tests, investigating the utility of both, alone and in combination.  Methods and Material:: This study was a cross-sectional comparative study with a total of 77 samples included. Every diagnosis was documented to generate the values based on predictive power, which include sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV).  Results:: In all the samples, ADA was first compared to GeneXpert in ascitic fluid (sensitivity 75%, specificity 6.9%, PPV 10% and NPV of 66.67%) and in pleural fluid (sensitivity 94.11%, specificity 3.70%, PPV 38.09% and NPV 50%). GeneXpert compared to ADA in ascitic fluid (sensitivity 10%, specificity 66.67%, and PPV 75%, and NPV 6.89%) and in pleural fluid (sensitivity 38.10%, specificity 50%, PPV 94.12% and NPV 3.70%).  Conclusions:: ADA can be used with relative confidence to test EPTB, due to its high sensitivity as well as reliable negative predictive value, in contrast GeneXpert/PCR is strongly recommended in the detection of pre-existing Tb cases, due to its high specificity. Further studies and investigations are required to help health care providers establish the collective use reducing both morbidity and mortality. This study reinforces the use of ADA in cases of EPTB.
SN  - 2249-4863
SN  - 2278-7135
ER  -