Safety and tolerability of elinzanetant: a pooled analysis from four randomized clinical trials
Abstract
Background
Elinzanetant is a dual neurokinin (NK)-1 and NK-3 receptor antagonist approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe vasomotor symptoms (VMS) associated with menopause, or those caused by adjuvant endocrine therapy for breast cancer treatment.Methods
In this pooled safety analysis, safety data were pooled from four randomized, placebo-controlled studies: the phase IIb SWITCH-1 trial (2018-2019) and phase III OASIS-1-3 trials (2021-2024). All four studies were multicentre, multinational, double-blind trials that included postmenopausal women aged 40-65 years experiencing moderate-to-severe VMS due to natural or surgical menopause. Data were analysed exploratively. Assessments included frequency of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) over 12 and 52 weeks, and exposure-adjusted incidence rates (EAIRs, with 95% confidence intervals [CIs]) over 52 weeks. EAIRs were calculated by weighting event counts against total exposure time (person-years) across studies. Additionally, liver safety and incidence of neoplasms were evaluated.Findings
The 12-week pooled safety analysis set included 1519 participants: 765 participants in the elinzanetant 120 mg group and 754 participants in the placebo group. The 52-week pooled safety analysis set included 1113 participants in the elinzanetant 120 mg group and 754 participants in the placebo group. TEAEs occurred in 50·8% and 43·2% of participants in the elinzanetant 120 mg and the placebo groups, respectively, over 12 weeks; EAIRs were 196·61 (95% CI 181·33-213·18) and 209·00 (95% CI: 188·96-231·15) in the elinzanetant and placebo groups, respectively, over 52 weeks. The most common TEAEs reported with elinzanetant were headache, fatigue, and somnolence. Treatment discontinuation was low with elinzanetant (7·8%) but higher than placebo (3·6%) over 12 weeks; EAIRs were 14·95 (95% CI 11·99-18·62) and 10·96 (95% CI 7·87-15·27), respectively, over 52 weeks. There were no Hy's Law cases or indication of cholestatic injury. EAIRs of malignant tumors had overlapping CIs between treatment groups. No endometrial hyperplasia/malignancy was reported in either group.Interpretation
The overall safety profile of elinzanetant appeared favorable in 1113 women based on this exploratory pooled safety analysis. Future time-to-event analyses of TEAEs and real-world post-marketing data are warranted to better characterize the long-term safety profile of elinzanetant.Funding
Bayer.
Related
- Safety, Tolerability and Antiviral Activity of GST‐HG131 in Chronic Hepatitis B: A Randomized, Double‐Blind Phase IIa Study
- Twelve-Month Efficacy and Visual Tolerability of MyoPi Spectacle Lenses in Childhood Myopia : A Randomized Clinical Trial
- Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of EGT710, a Novel Coronavirus Mpro Inhibitor, in Healthy Adults: A Randomized, Single- and Multiple-Dose Study.
- A Phase I, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose escalation study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of intravenous ertapenem and zidebactam in combination (WCK 6777) in healthy adult subjects
- Short-term safety and local tolerability of repeated exposure to aerosolized hypochlorous acid dry fog in healthy adults: a randomized controlled pilot study
BibTeX
@article{pinkerton2026safety,
title = {{Safety and tolerability of elinzanetant: a pooled analysis from four randomized clinical trials}},
author = {JoAnn V. Pinkerton and Maja Francuski and Rossella E. Nappi and James A. Simon and Chenshuang Lu and Senka Djordjevic and Christian Seitz and Nick Panay},
journal = {eClinicalMedicine},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.104250},
url = {https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2589537026005031},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Safety and tolerability of elinzanetant: a pooled analysis from four randomized clinical trials
AU - JoAnn V. Pinkerton
AU - Maja Francuski
AU - Rossella E. Nappi
AU - James A. Simon
AU - Chenshuang Lu
AU - Senka Djordjevic
AU - Christian Seitz
AU - Nick Panay
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/07
JO - eClinicalMedicine
DO - 10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.104250
UR - https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2589537026005031
AB - Background Elinzanetant is a dual neurokinin (NK)-1 and NK-3 receptor antagonist approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe vasomotor symptoms (VMS) associated with menopause, or those caused by adjuvant endocrine therapy for breast cancer treatment.Methods In this pooled safety analysis, safety data were pooled from four randomized, placebo-controlled studies: the phase IIb SWITCH-1 trial (2018-2019) and phase III OASIS-1-3 trials (2021-2024). All four studies were multicentre, multinational, double-blind trials that included postmenopausal women aged 40-65 years experiencing moderate-to-severe VMS due to natural or surgical menopause. Data were analysed exploratively. Assessments included frequency of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) over 12 and 52 weeks, and exposure-adjusted incidence rates (EAIRs, with 95% confidence intervals [CIs]) over 52 weeks. EAIRs were calculated by weighting event counts against total exposure time (person-years) across studies. Additionally, liver safety and incidence of neoplasms were evaluated.Findings The 12-week pooled safety analysis set included 1519 participants: 765 participants in the elinzanetant 120 mg group and 754 participants in the placebo group. The 52-week pooled safety analysis set included 1113 participants in the elinzanetant 120 mg group and 754 participants in the placebo group. TEAEs occurred in 50·8% and 43·2% of participants in the elinzanetant 120 mg and the placebo groups, respectively, over 12 weeks; EAIRs were 196·61 (95% CI 181·33-213·18) and 209·00 (95% CI: 188·96-231·15) in the elinzanetant and placebo groups, respectively, over 52 weeks. The most common TEAEs reported with elinzanetant were headache, fatigue, and somnolence. Treatment discontinuation was low with elinzanetant (7·8%) but higher than placebo (3·6%) over 12 weeks; EAIRs were 14·95 (95% CI 11·99-18·62) and 10·96 (95% CI 7·87-15·27), respectively, over 52 weeks. There were no Hy's Law cases or indication of cholestatic injury. EAIRs of malignant tumors had overlapping CIs between treatment groups. No endometrial hyperplasia/malignancy was reported in either group.Interpretation The overall safety profile of elinzanetant appeared favorable in 1113 women based on this exploratory pooled safety analysis. Future time-to-event analyses of TEAEs and real-world post-marketing data are warranted to better characterize the long-term safety profile of elinzanetant.Funding Bayer.
SN - 2589-5370
ER -