Female Representation and Quality Indicators in Anesthesiology and Critical Care Podcasts.
4 affiliations
- 1Department of Surgical Sciences, Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
- 2Department of Surgical Sciences, Clinical Pain Research, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
- 3Department of Neurosurgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, USA.
- 4Centre for Disaster Medicine, Department of Diagnostics and Intervention, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Abstract
Background
Podcasts have emerged as prominent tools for asynchronous medical education, widely adopted across training levels and specialties. Diverse representation strengthens medical discourse, making an evaluation of speaker demographics essential for understanding equity and quality in digital knowledge dissemination. This study systematically evaluates female representation and quality assurance indicators in anesthesiology and critical care podcasts, including longitudinal publication trends.Methods
We systematically searched Apple Podcasts and Spotify using specialty-specific terms and manually reviewed the top twenty journals in the field for affiliated podcasts. Included were active, English-language, physician-hosted podcasts.Results
Eighty-five podcasts (53.0% US-based) comprising 10,190 episodes were analyzed. Of 12,522 hosts, 31.5% (n = 3945) were female; of 10,822 guests, 35.9% (n = 3882) were female. Notably, among US-based podcasts, female guest representation exceeded the 26.5% female workforce proportion among US anesthesiologists. Episodes with exclusively male hosts had 2.13 times the odds of featuring only male guests (95% CI 1.88-2.41). A positive trend of increasing female participation was observed from 2010 to 2024. Content support was variable: using broad, inclusive definitions, 42.0% of episodes had show notes and 48.4% provided supplemental material. Analysis of quality-related structures showed that 40.0% (n = 34) of podcasts produced episodes linked to a publication, 50.6% featured some episodes with three or more speakers, 21.2% of podcasts were journal-affiliated, and 20.0% were university-affiliated.Conclusion
While a sex imbalance persists in anesthesiology and critical care podcasting, female participation among US-based podcasts exceeds local workforce demographic benchmarks, with a clear positive trend from 2010 to 2024. However, persistent sex similarity in speaker selection suggests ongoing biases. Quality assurance mechanisms remain highly variable, highlighting opportunities for incremental improvement. Future efforts could focus on structured guest selection and transparent quality indicators to accelerate progress toward equitable representation and educational quality in this influential medium.Editorial comment
In modern times, many clinicians look for, and listen to, podcasts aimed at education in clinical specialties. This sampling of podcasts related to our specialty looked at how females and males contributed to podcast content generation and dissemination, as a marker for male versus female representation in speakership for continuing specialty education.
Related
- Reimagining Literature Evaluation Pedagogy Through AI-Generated Podcasts: Pharmacy Students’ Perspectives and Critical Appraisal
- Training and Assessment of Non-Technical Human Factor Skills Among Anesthesiology Residents: An Exploratory Educational Quality Improvement Initiative.
- Speech- and Text-Based Emotion Recognition in Anesthesiology Residents During Critical Incident Simulation Training: Exploratory Observational Study.
- When Quality Indicators Become Competencies: Indonesia's New Emergency Medicine Standard and the Core Components of CBME
- Research on health information quality evaluation indicators for mobile social media based on user perception
BibTeX
@article{steinsdottir2026female,
title = {{Female Representation and Quality Indicators in Anesthesiology and Critical Care Podcasts.}},
author = {Perla Steinsdóttir and Sana Asif and Rakel N Kristinsdóttir and Alexander Rosenström and Andrea Niklasson and Nicholas Dietz and Siri Å Fåhraeus and Johan Hylander and Martin F Bjurström},
journal = {Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1111/aas.70356},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42875972},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Female Representation and Quality Indicators in Anesthesiology and Critical Care Podcasts.
AU - Perla Steinsdóttir
AU - Sana Asif
AU - Rakel N Kristinsdóttir
AU - Alexander Rosenström
AU - Andrea Niklasson
AU - Nicholas Dietz
AU - Siri Å Fåhraeus
AU - Johan Hylander
AU - Martin F Bjurström
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/30
JO - Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
DO - 10.1111/aas.70356
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42875972
AB - Background Podcasts have emerged as prominent tools for asynchronous medical education, widely adopted across training levels and specialties. Diverse representation strengthens medical discourse, making an evaluation of speaker demographics essential for understanding equity and quality in digital knowledge dissemination. This study systematically evaluates female representation and quality assurance indicators in anesthesiology and critical care podcasts, including longitudinal publication trends.Methods We systematically searched Apple Podcasts and Spotify using specialty-specific terms and manually reviewed the top twenty journals in the field for affiliated podcasts. Included were active, English-language, physician-hosted podcasts.Results Eighty-five podcasts (53.0% US-based) comprising 10,190 episodes were analyzed. Of 12,522 hosts, 31.5% (n = 3945) were female; of 10,822 guests, 35.9% (n = 3882) were female. Notably, among US-based podcasts, female guest representation exceeded the 26.5% female workforce proportion among US anesthesiologists. Episodes with exclusively male hosts had 2.13 times the odds of featuring only male guests (95% CI 1.88-2.41). A positive trend of increasing female participation was observed from 2010 to 2024. Content support was variable: using broad, inclusive definitions, 42.0% of episodes had show notes and 48.4% provided supplemental material. Analysis of quality-related structures showed that 40.0% (n = 34) of podcasts produced episodes linked to a publication, 50.6% featured some episodes with three or more speakers, 21.2% of podcasts were journal-affiliated, and 20.0% were university-affiliated.Conclusion While a sex imbalance persists in anesthesiology and critical care podcasting, female participation among US-based podcasts exceeds local workforce demographic benchmarks, with a clear positive trend from 2010 to 2024. However, persistent sex similarity in speaker selection suggests ongoing biases. Quality assurance mechanisms remain highly variable, highlighting opportunities for incremental improvement. Future efforts could focus on structured guest selection and transparent quality indicators to accelerate progress toward equitable representation and educational quality in this influential medium.Editorial comment In modern times, many clinicians look for, and listen to, podcasts aimed at education in clinical specialties. This sampling of podcasts related to our specialty looked at how females and males contributed to podcast content generation and dissemination, as a marker for male versus female representation in speakership for continuing specialty education.
SN - 0001-5172
SN - 1399-6576
ER -