Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 36 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0British Journal of Health Psychology

Unravelling the relationship between exercise-induced affective responses and daily physical activity in people with chronic diseases: Spillover or confounding effect?

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Exercise-induced affective responses (ARs) may encourage people with chronic diseases (PCD) to engage in future physical activity (PA). This study examined whether AR timing during exercise predicts daily moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA) in PCD and explored two mediating pathways: the reflective affect processing pathway (via remembered pleasure, forecasted pleasure and affective attitudes) and the self-efficacy pathway (via self-efficacy towards exercise and PA). DESIGN: Prospective correlational design. METHODS: A total of 109 adults (M(age) = 66.6 years, 79% women) with chronic diseases reported ARs and perceived exertion four times during an exercise session. Post-exercise measures included remembered and forecasted pleasure, BMI, affective attitudes and self-efficacy. Daily MVPA was measured using accelerometers over eight days. Total PA (light-intensity PA and MVPA) was examined as a secondary outcome. RESULTS: The last AR predicted daily MVPA (β = .24, p = .041), but this association became non-significant after adjusting for confounders (BMI, perceived exertion). In contrast, the last AR predicted total PA independently of confounders (β = .30, p = .008). Exploratory mediation analyses partially supported the reflective affect processing pathway: ARs predicted affective attitudes via remembered and forecasted pleasure, though affective attitudes did not predict either PA outcome. The self-efficacy pathway was supported for MVPA only, albeit with a modest indirect effect (β = .05). CONCLUSIONS: The last AR did not predict daily MVPA after adjusting for confounders, questioning a spillover effect from exercise sessions to MVPA. Secondary analyses suggest the last AR may predict total PA regardless of confounders, hinting at an intensity-specific spillover. Findings should be interpreted cautiously given the limited sample size and the exploratory nature of secondary analyses.

Related

  1. How Affective States Moderate the Relationship of Pain Catastrophizing With Pain Severity in Patients With Acute and Chronic Pain
    Quinte T. Y. Kuper, Jasmijn E. Willemen, Richel Lousberg +3
    Brain and behaviorPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Adverse childhood experiences and functional stability in the affective-to-psychotic spectrum: a longitudinal multistate analysis of employment and relationship outcomes.
    Fanny Senner, Elena Merkle, Michael Lauseker +28
    Frontiers in psychiatryPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textPsychiatry & mental healthEurope PMCCrossref
  3. Do Meditators Stress Less? Long-Term Meditators Differ in Affective but Not Autonomic Responses to an Acute Psychosocial Stressor
    Ivana Buric, George M. Slavich, Katarina Jaukovic +2
    PsyArXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textPhysiologyPsychiatry & mental healthOSF
  4. Motivational and Consummatory Anhedonia Represent Distinct Affective and Behavioral Responses to Effortful and Rewarding Activities in Daily Life
    Tatiana Pillsbury, Samantha A. Betters, Marta Migo +7
    PsyArXivPreprintCC0Full textPsychiatry & mental healthOSF
  5. Exercise-induced DNA damage: Is there a relationship with inflammatory responses?
    Oliver Neubauer, Stefanie Reichhold, Armen K. Nersesyan +2
    PubMedPeer-reviewedLicence not stated58 citedPhysiologyOpenAlex
BibTeX
@article{fessler2026unravelling,
  title = {{Unravelling the relationship between exercise-induced affective responses and daily physical activity in people with chronic diseases: Spillover or confounding effect?}},
  author = {Layan Fessler and Dan Orsholits and Alexis Le Faucheur and Ryan E Rhodes and Boris Cheval and Philippe Sarrazin},
  journal = {British Journal of Health Psychology},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.1111/bjhp.70097},
  url = {https://hal.science/hal-05771991v1},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Unravelling the relationship between exercise-induced affective responses and daily physical activity in people with chronic diseases: Spillover or confounding effect?
AU  - Layan Fessler
AU  - Dan Orsholits
AU  - Alexis Le Faucheur
AU  - Ryan E Rhodes
AU  - Boris Cheval
AU  - Philippe Sarrazin
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/30
JO  - British Journal of Health Psychology
DO  - 10.1111/bjhp.70097
UR  - https://hal.science/hal-05771991v1
AB  - OBJECTIVES: Exercise-induced affective responses (ARs) may encourage people with chronic diseases (PCD) to engage in future physical activity (PA). This study examined whether AR timing during exercise predicts daily moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA) in PCD and explored two mediating pathways: the reflective affect processing pathway (via remembered pleasure, forecasted pleasure and affective attitudes) and the self-efficacy pathway (via self-efficacy towards exercise and PA). DESIGN: Prospective correlational design. METHODS: A total of 109 adults (M(age) = 66.6 years, 79% women) with chronic diseases reported ARs and perceived exertion four times during an exercise session. Post-exercise measures included remembered and forecasted pleasure, BMI, affective attitudes and self-efficacy. Daily MVPA was measured using accelerometers over eight days. Total PA (light-intensity PA and MVPA) was examined as a secondary outcome. RESULTS: The last AR predicted daily MVPA (β = .24, p = .041), but this association became non-significant after adjusting for confounders (BMI, perceived exertion). In contrast, the last AR predicted total PA independently of confounders (β = .30, p = .008). Exploratory mediation analyses partially supported the reflective affect processing pathway: ARs predicted affective attitudes via remembered and forecasted pleasure, though affective attitudes did not predict either PA outcome. The self-efficacy pathway was supported for MVPA only, albeit with a modest indirect effect (β = .05). CONCLUSIONS: The last AR did not predict daily MVPA after adjusting for confounders, questioning a spillover effect from exercise sessions to MVPA. Secondary analyses suggest the last AR may predict total PA regardless of confounders, hinting at an intensity-specific spillover. Findings should be interpreted cautiously given the limited sample size and the exploratory nature of secondary analyses.
SN  - 1359-107X
SN  - 2044-8287
ER  -