Do Meditators Stress Less? Long-Term Meditators Differ in Affective but Not Autonomic Responses to an Acute Psychosocial Stressor
Abstract
Although regular meditation practice is widely assumed to buffer responses to stress, direct evidence from long-term meditators remains limited. We compared 80 long-term mindfulness meditators and 68 meditation-naïve controls on affective and autonomic responses to an acute psychosocial stressor, a modified Trier Social Stress Test (TSST). Negative and positive affect were assessed before and after the TSST, and vagally mediated heart rate variability (HRV) was assessed across baseline, stress anticipation, and recovery in a subsample of 70 participants. In preregistered analyses, meditators reported lower post-stress negative affect (ηp2 = .05) and higher post-stress positive affect (ηp2 = .04) than controls after accounting for pre-stress affect, age, and gender. Meditators’ lower emotion-regulation difficulties accounted for their lower negative and higher positive affect before the stressor but not for group differences in affective change. In contrast, meditators and controls did not differ in HRV, either overall or across TSST phases, with Bayesian analyses providing strong to extreme evidence for the absence of group effects (BF01 > 14). In exploratory analyses, meditators reported fewer and less severe stressors over the past year despite comparable lifetime stressor exposure. Long-term meditation was thus associated with modestly more favourable affective, but not autonomic, responses to an acute psychosocial stressor. The stress-buffering benefits associated with long-term meditation may therefore operate less through attenuated reactivity to acute stressors and more through processes that reduce stressor exposure or facilitate recovery in daily life.
Related
- Effects of morning versus evening high-intensity exercise on electroencephalographic and autonomic responses in middle-aged women
- Pilot study of autonomic and cardiovascular responses to orthostatic stress among young adults with visual and hearing impairments
- Motivational and Consummatory Anhedonia Represent Distinct Affective and Behavioral Responses to Effortful and Rewarding Activities in Daily Life
- Unravelling the relationship between exercise-induced affective responses and daily physical activity in people with chronic diseases: Spillover or confounding effect?
- Exploration of emotional and psychosocial responses following initial HIV Diagnosis: A qualitative study
BibTeX
@misc{buric2026meditators,
title = {{Do Meditators Stress Less? Long-Term Meditators Differ in Affective but Not Autonomic Responses to an Acute Psychosocial Stressor}},
author = {Ivana Buric and George M. Slavich and Katarina Jaukovic and Gorkem Atilla and Tom Smeets},
howpublished = {PsyArXiv},
year = {2026},
month = nov,
doi = {10.31234/osf.io/pux23_v1},
url = {https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/pux23_v1/},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Do Meditators Stress Less? Long-Term Meditators Differ in Affective but Not Autonomic Responses to an Acute Psychosocial Stressor
AU - Ivana Buric
AU - George M. Slavich
AU - Katarina Jaukovic
AU - Gorkem Atilla
AU - Tom Smeets
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/11/04
PB - PsyArXiv
DO - 10.31234/osf.io/pux23_v1
UR - https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/pux23_v1/
AB - Although regular meditation practice is widely assumed to buffer responses to stress, direct evidence from long-term meditators remains limited. We compared 80 long-term mindfulness meditators and 68 meditation-naïve controls on affective and autonomic responses to an acute psychosocial stressor, a modified Trier Social Stress Test (TSST). Negative and positive affect were assessed before and after the TSST, and vagally mediated heart rate variability (HRV) was assessed across baseline, stress anticipation, and recovery in a subsample of 70 participants. In preregistered analyses, meditators reported lower post-stress negative affect (ηp2 = .05) and higher post-stress positive affect (ηp2 = .04) than controls after accounting for pre-stress affect, age, and gender. Meditators’ lower emotion-regulation difficulties accounted for their lower negative and higher positive affect before the stressor but not for group differences in affective change. In contrast, meditators and controls did not differ in HRV, either overall or across TSST phases, with Bayesian analyses providing strong to extreme evidence for the absence of group effects (BF01 > 14). In exploratory analyses, meditators reported fewer and less severe stressors over the past year despite comparable lifetime stressor exposure. Long-term meditation was thus associated with modestly more favourable affective, but not autonomic, responses to an acute psychosocial stressor. The stress-buffering benefits associated with long-term meditation may therefore operate less through attenuated reactivity to acute stressors and more through processes that reduce stressor exposure or facilitate recovery in daily life.
ER -