Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated just now
Peer-reviewedCC BYFrontiers in oncology

ER⁻/PR⁺ breast cancer: from diagnostic discordance to precision therapy.

  1. 1Department of Thyroid and Breast Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong, University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
  2. 2Department of Orthopedics, Union Hospital,Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
  3. 3Department of Thyroid and Breast Surgery, People's Hospital of Dongxihu District Wuhan City and Union Dongxihu Hospital, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.

Abstract

Estrogen receptor-negative/progesterone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (ER⁻/PR⁺/HER2⁻)breast cancer is a rare, controversial type that makes up about 0. 3% of all breast cancer cases and does not follow the traditional ER→PR regulatory hierarchy. This review synthesizes the available evidence on the diagnostic evaluation, clinicopathological characteristics, molecular mechanisms, prognosis, and treatment of ER⁻/PR⁺/HER2⁻(ER⁻/PR⁺) breast cancer. Although there are false-negative ER staining results and pre-analytical/analytical factors, a number of clinical and transcriptomic data support the existence of a reproducible ER⁻/PR⁺subgroup with molecular heterogeneity. These tumors often have a high histological grade, elevated Ki-67 expression, TP53 alterations, and basal-like features, and are closer to triple-negative breast cancer than luminal disease. Potential drivers include ER-independent non-canonical PR activation, epigenetic dysregulation, kinase-mediated receptor phosphorylation, membrane-associated progesterone signaling and receptor network reprogramming. Direct subtype-specific evidence remains limited, and the effectiveness of conventional endocrine therapy is unknown. Current guidelines classify these tumors as hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative, obscuring clinically relevant heterogeneity. Standardized repeat testing and multi-omic characterization are thus required. Future studies should prioritize prospective multicenter cohorts with paired pre-treatment and post-treatment receptor testing, spatial or single-cell characterization, biomarker-guided stratification and adaptive clinical trials. A PR-oriented precision-medicine framework may improve diagnostic classification and help identify therapeutic vulnerabilities in biologically distinct patient subsets. In addition, this rare phenotype may serve as a useful model for investigating lineage plasticity and endocrine resistance.

Related

  1. Receptor Status Changes, HER2-Low Discordance, and TNBC Transformation in Metastatic Breast Cancer: Prognostic Significance and Impact on Survival Outcomes
    Ayşe Nuransoy Cengiz, Muhammet Cengiz, Oktay Bozkurt +7
    Journal of Clinical MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textOncologyCrossrefEurope PMC
  2. Diagnostic stage discordance and survival in T2 bladder cancer: rethinking the clinical behavior of progressive disease
    Adem Tunçekin, Yasin Aktaş, Hakan Türk +1
    BMC UrologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textSurgery & anaesthesiaPMC
  3. Integrated CDK4/6 inhibitor resistance and primary-metastatic discordance in hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: a translational framework focused on invasive ductal carcinoma with gastric metastasis.
    Minyi Cheng, Dongqing Wang, Yingyi Lin +4
    Frontiers in oncologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textOncologyEurope PMCCrossref
  4. AI-driven multi-omics biomarkers in precision breast cancer therapeutics: from discovery to clinical translation
    Dimitrios Stylianakis, Rodrigo Sánchez-Bayona, Nerina Denaro +1
    Frontiers in pharmacologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textPharmacology & toxicologyEurope PMC
  5. Precision de-escalation in HER2-enriched breast cancer: promise and pitfalls of multiomic response predictors
    Jessé Lopes da Silva, Andréia Cristina de Melo
    Translational Breast Cancer ResearchPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textOncologyPMC
BibTeX
@article{shao2026erpr,
  title = {{ER⁻/PR⁺ breast cancer: from diagnostic discordance to precision therapy.}},
  author = {Yuanhao Shao and Meng Zhou and Zhenwei Hu and Bin Wu and Jing Zhou},
  journal = {Frontiers in oncology},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3389/fonc.2026.1961666},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42898714},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - ER⁻/PR⁺ breast cancer: from diagnostic discordance to precision therapy.
AU  - Yuanhao Shao
AU  - Meng Zhou
AU  - Zhenwei Hu
AU  - Bin Wu
AU  - Jing Zhou
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/05
JO  - Frontiers in oncology
DO  - 10.3389/fonc.2026.1961666
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42898714
AB  - Estrogen receptor-negative/progesterone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (ER⁻/PR⁺/HER2⁻)breast cancer is a rare, controversial type that makes up about 0. 3% of all breast cancer cases and does not follow the traditional ER→PR regulatory hierarchy. This review synthesizes the available evidence on the diagnostic evaluation, clinicopathological characteristics, molecular mechanisms, prognosis, and treatment of ER⁻/PR⁺/HER2⁻(ER⁻/PR⁺) breast cancer. Although there are false-negative ER staining results and pre-analytical/analytical factors, a number of clinical and transcriptomic data support the existence of a reproducible ER⁻/PR⁺subgroup with molecular heterogeneity. These tumors often have a high histological grade, elevated Ki-67 expression, TP53 alterations, and basal-like features, and are closer to triple-negative breast cancer than luminal disease. Potential drivers include ER-independent non-canonical PR activation, epigenetic dysregulation, kinase-mediated receptor phosphorylation, membrane-associated progesterone signaling and receptor network reprogramming. Direct subtype-specific evidence remains limited, and the effectiveness of conventional endocrine therapy is unknown. Current guidelines classify these tumors as hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative, obscuring clinically relevant heterogeneity. Standardized repeat testing and multi-omic characterization are thus required. Future studies should prioritize prospective multicenter cohorts with paired pre-treatment and post-treatment receptor testing, spatial or single-cell characterization, biomarker-guided stratification and adaptive clinical trials. A PR-oriented precision-medicine framework may improve diagnostic classification and help identify therapeutic vulnerabilities in biologically distinct patient subsets. In addition, this rare phenotype may serve as a useful model for investigating lineage plasticity and endocrine resistance.
SN  - 2234-943X
ER  -