Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 42 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NC-NDbioRxiv

Retinal Resistivity Mapped by Electrical Resistance Tomography

1 more authors

Abstract

A bstract : Retinal resistivity is a key parameter for modeling both the electric field in tissue and the resulting neural response - a crucial step in designing retinal prostheses, especially since both depend on resistivity nonlinearly. Previous studies using penetrating microelectrodes reported vastly different values, varying by as much as two orders of magnitude, likely due to parasitic capacitance in microelectrodes, compression of tissue, and its rupture by the inserted probe, allowing the conductive medium to seep in and alter the measurement. To measure retinal resistivity without compression or rupture, we applied electrical resistance tomography using a planar multielectrode array with a 30 µm pitch. Voltage waveforms generated in response to current injected from one electrode were measured on other electrodes in the array, at distances ranging from 30 to 600 µm. Data from wild-type and degenerated rat retinas were analyzed using two methods: a commercial inversion software, Res2DInv, and a custom machine learning-based decoder, with healthy retina approximated as a 4-layer structure and degenerated retina - as a 3-layer one.

In healthy retina, average resistivity was 2.7 kΩ·cm for the combined ganglion cell-nerve fiber layer, 1.6 kΩ·cm for the inner plexiform layer, 2.3 kΩ·cm for the outer and inner nuclear layers, and 1.0 kΩ·cm for the photoreceptor inner and outer segments; a single-layer approximation yielded 1.7 kΩ·cm. In degenerated retina, average resistivity was 3.4 kΩ·cm for the ganglion cell-nerve fiber layer, 1.1 kΩ·cm for the inner plexiform layer, and 4 kΩ·cm for the inner nuclear layer, with a single-layer approximation of 2 kΩ·cm.

S ignificance : Designing retinal prostheses to restore vision after loss of photoreceptors requires accurate modeling of electric field in tissue, but published resistivity values vary by two orders of magnitude due to inconsistencies with penetrating microelectrode-based measurements. We adapted electrical resistance tomography, a non-destructive technique from geophysics based on inverse problem solving, and developed a machine learning-based decoder to map resistivity in rat retinas using a planar microelectrode array. Our analysis yields quantitative, layer-specific resistivities for healthy and degenerated retina. Beyond retinal prostheses, this approach offers a general, deformation-free strategy for measuring electrical properties of biological tissues.

Related

  1. Retinal layer structure on optical coherence tomography in post-traumatic stress disorder
    Sejal D. Patel, Naveen Karthik, Grant A. Justin +6
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral biochemistryCell biologyPLOSPMC
  2. Electrical stimulation induced Hsp70 response in C2C12 cells
    Lei Wang, Yuefei Liu, Jin, Hong +1
    PubMedPeer-reviewedLicence not stated7 citedMolecular biology & gene regulationOpenAlex
  3. Retinal organoid–based evaluation of icariin-loaded extracellular vesicles for hypoxia-induced retinal injury via mitochondrial modulation
    Mira Park, Hyeoun Ji Kim, Yoon-Ha Go +5
    Frontiers in cell and developmental biologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral biochemistryEurope PMC
  4. The First 40 Years of Molecular Ophthalmology Part One: Inherited Retinal Disease: The 2026 Friedenwald Lecture
    Edwin M. Stone
    Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual SciencePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textMolecular biology & gene regulationPMC
  5. Protein inhibitor of retinal membrane guanylyl cyclase rescues photoreceptors from degeneration induced by mutated guanylyl cyclase activating protein
    Lyuqi Tan, Igor V. Peshenko, Elena V. Olshevskaya +1
    Journal of Biological ChemistryPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Molecular biology & gene regulationCrossref
BibTeX
@misc{goldstein2026retinal,
  title = {{Retinal Resistivity Mapped by Electrical Resistance Tomography}},
  author = {Anna Kochnev Goldstein and Mohammad Asif Zaman and Michael Aaron Sommeling and Sarthak Vinay Shah and Amrith Lotlikar and Mohajeet B. Bhuckory and Davis Pham-Howard and Zhijie Charles Chen and Praful Vasireddy and A.J. Phillips and Aviv Sharon and E.J. Chichilnisky and Daniel Palanker},
  howpublished = {bioRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.10.13.756866},
  url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.13.756866v1},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Retinal Resistivity Mapped by Electrical Resistance Tomography
AU  - Anna Kochnev Goldstein
AU  - Mohammad Asif Zaman
AU  - Michael Aaron Sommeling
AU  - Sarthak Vinay Shah
AU  - Amrith Lotlikar
AU  - Mohajeet B. Bhuckory
AU  - Davis Pham-Howard
AU  - Zhijie Charles Chen
AU  - Praful Vasireddy
AU  - A.J. Phillips
AU  - Aviv Sharon
AU  - E.J. Chichilnisky
AU  - Daniel Palanker
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/13
PB  - bioRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.10.13.756866
UR  - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.13.756866v1
AB  - A bstract : Retinal resistivity is a key parameter for modeling both the electric field in tissue and the resulting neural response - a crucial step in designing retinal prostheses, especially since both depend on resistivity nonlinearly. Previous studies using penetrating microelectrodes reported vastly different values, varying by as much as two orders of magnitude, likely due to parasitic capacitance in microelectrodes, compression of tissue, and its rupture by the inserted probe, allowing the conductive medium to seep in and alter the measurement. To measure retinal resistivity without compression or rupture, we applied electrical resistance tomography using a planar multielectrode array with a 30 µm pitch. Voltage waveforms generated in response to current injected from one electrode were measured on other electrodes in the array, at distances ranging from 30 to 600 µm. Data from wild-type and degenerated rat retinas were analyzed using two methods: a commercial inversion software, Res2DInv, and a custom machine learning-based decoder, with healthy retina approximated as a 4-layer structure and degenerated retina - as a 3-layer one.  In healthy retina, average resistivity was 2.7 kΩ·cm for the combined ganglion cell-nerve fiber layer, 1.6 kΩ·cm for the inner plexiform layer, 2.3 kΩ·cm for the outer and inner nuclear layers, and 1.0 kΩ·cm for the photoreceptor inner and outer segments; a single-layer approximation yielded 1.7 kΩ·cm. In degenerated retina, average resistivity was 3.4 kΩ·cm for the ganglion cell-nerve fiber layer, 1.1 kΩ·cm for the inner plexiform layer, and 4 kΩ·cm for the inner nuclear layer, with a single-layer approximation of 2 kΩ·cm.  S ignificance : Designing retinal prostheses to restore vision after loss of photoreceptors requires accurate modeling of electric field in tissue, but published resistivity values vary by two orders of magnitude due to inconsistencies with penetrating microelectrode-based measurements. We adapted electrical resistance tomography, a non-destructive technique from geophysics based on inverse problem solving, and developed a machine learning-based decoder to map resistivity in rat retinas using a planar microelectrode array. Our analysis yields quantitative, layer-specific resistivities for healthy and degenerated retina. Beyond retinal prostheses, this approach offers a general, deformation-free strategy for measuring electrical properties of biological tissues.
SN  - 2692-8205
ER  -