Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
220,782 studies31 sourcesUpdated 26 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0IJID Regions

Timing of outbreak-triggered unit-wide screening and COVID-19 outbreak size in long-term care and related social welfare facilities in Okinawa, Japan

9 affiliations
  1. 1Graduate School of Advanced Integrated Studies in Human Survivability, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Kyoto, Japan
  2. 2Emergency Medical Center, Urasoe General Hospital, Urasoe, Okinawa, Japan
  3. 3The Okinawa Prefecture Commission for Epidemiological and Statistical Analysis, Naha, Okinawa, Japan
  4. 4Unité d’Epidémiologie des Maladies Emergentes, Institut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
  5. 5Pasteur International Unit at Kumamoto University/Japan Institute for Health Security, Tokyo, Japan
  6. 6Joint Research Center for Human Retrovirus Infection, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
  7. 7Department of Emergency Medicine, Nakagami Hospital, Okinawa, Okinawa, Japan
  8. 8Okinawa Prefectural Government, Naha, Okinawa, Japan
  9. 9Division of Infectious Diseases, Okinawa Prefectural Chubu Hospital, Uruma, Okinawa, Japan

Abstract

Objectives: Coronavirus disease 2019 outbreaks in long-term care facilities can spread rapidly, but evidence on whether delayed outbreak-triggered unit-wide screening is associated with outbreak size is limited.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational study using outbreak-support records from long-term care and related social welfare facilities in Okinawa Prefecture, Japan, from April to September 2022. We included outbreaks with documented unit-wide screening. The outcome was the final outbreak size. The exposure was the delay from outbreak recognition to the first unit-wide screening (same day, 1 day, 2 days, or ≥3 days). We used multivariable negative binomial regression, adjusting for index case type, facility type, recognition period, and facility-level resident vaccination coverage.

Results: We analyzed 707 outbreaks. Compared with same-day screening, the adjusted incidence rate ratios for outbreak size were 0.95 (95% confidence interval 0.72-1.26) for a 1-day delay, 1.16 (0.87-1.54) for a 2-day delay, and 1.44 (1.09-1.91) for delays of ≥3 days. The association was attenuated after adjustment for on-site infection prevention and control visit timing.

Conclusion: Delays of ≥3 days from outbreak recognition to the first unit-wide screening were associated with a larger final outbreak size. Earlier outbreak-triggered screening may support outbreak control in long-term care facilities, although causal interpretation is limited by the observational design.

Related

  1. Prevalence and Related Factors of HIV Screening Adherence Among Pregnant Women in Primary and Secondary Healthcare Facilities: A Cross-Sectional Study.
    Mina Benaddi, Abdelhafid Benksim, El Mostafa Atiki +1
    Tropical medicine and infectious diseasePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textInfectious diseaseEurope PMC
  2. Bedside screening of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae using selective agar plates: A low-cost, laboratory-independent approach for rural healthcare facilities
    The Anh Ngo, Hieu Thi Nguyen, Nhung Ngoc Hoang +2
    PLOS Global Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textMicrobiologyPharmacology & toxicologyPLOS
  3. Assessing the Capacity of Health Facilities to Deliver Concomitant HPV Vaccination and HPV-Based Cervical Screening Services to Vulnerable Populations – An Implementation Research Protocol
    Isabel Mosquera, Anna Tisler, Arianis Tatiana Ramirez +28
    Cancer Control: Journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textGeneral biologyEpidemiology & public healthHAL
  4. Quantification of Medical Waste and Incineration-Related CO₂ Emissions Associated With Gastrointestinal Endoscopy at Two Facilities in Japan: A Preliminary Observational Study.
    Ryosuke Kawanishi, Atsushi Imagawa, Naoya Tada +3
    DEN openPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMC
  5. Age-Related Differences in Mental Health Status at Psychiatric Discharge Among Patients Across 10 Acute Care Facilities in Alberta, Canada: Cross-Sectional Study
    Wanying Mao, Ernest Owusu, Reham Shalaby +9
    JMIR Human FactorsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textPsychiatry & mental healthPMC
BibTeX
@article{xu2026timing,
  title = {{Timing of outbreak-triggered unit-wide screening and COVID-19 outbreak size in long-term care and related social welfare facilities in Okinawa, Japan}},
  author = {Yining S. Xu and Kuniko Takahashi and Yusuke Shimakawa and Takashi Nakamura and Toru Itokazu and Yoshihiro Takayama and Kenji Mizumoto},
  journal = {IJID Regions},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1016/j.ijregi.2026.101042},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijregi.2026.101042},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Timing of outbreak-triggered unit-wide screening and COVID-19 outbreak size in long-term care and related social welfare facilities in Okinawa, Japan
AU  - Yining S. Xu
AU  - Kuniko Takahashi
AU  - Yusuke Shimakawa
AU  - Takashi Nakamura
AU  - Toru Itokazu
AU  - Yoshihiro Takayama
AU  - Kenji Mizumoto
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/13
JO  - IJID Regions
DO  - 10.1016/j.ijregi.2026.101042
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijregi.2026.101042
AB  - Objectives: Coronavirus disease 2019 outbreaks in long-term care facilities can spread rapidly, but evidence on whether delayed outbreak-triggered unit-wide screening is associated with outbreak size is limited.  Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational study using outbreak-support records from long-term care and related social welfare facilities in Okinawa Prefecture, Japan, from April to September 2022. We included outbreaks with documented unit-wide screening. The outcome was the final outbreak size. The exposure was the delay from outbreak recognition to the first unit-wide screening (same day, 1 day, 2 days, or ≥3 days). We used multivariable negative binomial regression, adjusting for index case type, facility type, recognition period, and facility-level resident vaccination coverage.  Results: We analyzed 707 outbreaks. Compared with same-day screening, the adjusted incidence rate ratios for outbreak size were 0.95 (95% confidence interval 0.72-1.26) for a 1-day delay, 1.16 (0.87-1.54) for a 2-day delay, and 1.44 (1.09-1.91) for delays of ≥3 days. The association was attenuated after adjustment for on-site infection prevention and control visit timing.  Conclusion: Delays of ≥3 days from outbreak recognition to the first unit-wide screening were associated with a larger final outbreak size. Earlier outbreak-triggered screening may support outbreak control in long-term care facilities, although causal interpretation is limited by the observational design.
SN  - 2772-7076
ER  -