Optimal Guidance with Terminal Intercept-Angle Constraints and Acceleration Bounds
Abstract
Terminal intercept-angle control against a maneuvering target can substantially increase the required missile acceleration, potentially leading to saturation and interception failure unless acceleration limits are explicitly addressed. The engagement is therefore formulated as a linear-quadratic optimal-control problem with bounded acceleration commands. Polynomial approximations of the line-of-sight projection coefficients are used to better represent the nonlinear engagement geometry and estimate the time-to-go. The bounded optimal command is derived over saturated and unsaturated arcs, whose switching times are computed at each guidance step. The guidance law is derived for arbitrary linear missile dynamics and implemented for zero-order missile dynamics. For the zero-order model, the conditions under which the terminal demands can be met are derived in closed form, yielding the minimum and maximum reachable commanded terminal intercept angles. Performance is evaluated in nonlinear simulations. Compared with its unconstrained counterparts, the bounded formulation yields substantially smaller miss distances and terminal-angle errors when saturation is encountered. Unlike corresponding bounded miss-only guidance laws, the proposed law does not reduce to its unconstrained counterpart for minimum-phase missile dynamics because the acceleration command can saturate near the end of challenging engagements. The bounded law anticipates this saturation and compensates through earlier maneuvers.
Related
- Three-Dimensional Nonlinear LOS-Angle Shaping Guidance with Prescribed Initial Acceleration and Field-of-View Constraints
- Fuel-optimal Boost-Back Guidance via Successive Convexification with a Terminal Constraint for ReusableLaunch Vehicles
- Existence of uniformly most reliable two-terminal graphs with distance constraints
- Matching the Lower Bounds: Stochastic Contracting Cubic Newton and Its Optimal Acceleration
- Transformer-Based Warm-Starting for Feasible and Optimal Terminal Approach to Tumbling Objects with Space Manipulators
BibTeX
@misc{azaryahu2026optimal,
title = {{Optimal Guidance with Terminal Intercept-Angle Constraints and Acceleration Bounds}},
author = {Yoav Azaryahu and Vitaly Shaferman},
howpublished = {arXiv},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.28381},
eprint = {2609.28381},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.28381},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Optimal Guidance with Terminal Intercept-Angle Constraints and Acceleration Bounds
AU - Yoav Azaryahu
AU - Vitaly Shaferman
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/23
PB - arXiv
DO - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.28381
UR - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.28381
AB - Terminal intercept-angle control against a maneuvering target can substantially increase the required missile acceleration, potentially leading to saturation and interception failure unless acceleration limits are explicitly addressed. The engagement is therefore formulated as a linear-quadratic optimal-control problem with bounded acceleration commands. Polynomial approximations of the line-of-sight projection coefficients are used to better represent the nonlinear engagement geometry and estimate the time-to-go. The bounded optimal command is derived over saturated and unsaturated arcs, whose switching times are computed at each guidance step. The guidance law is derived for arbitrary linear missile dynamics and implemented for zero-order missile dynamics. For the zero-order model, the conditions under which the terminal demands can be met are derived in closed form, yielding the minimum and maximum reachable commanded terminal intercept angles. Performance is evaluated in nonlinear simulations. Compared with its unconstrained counterparts, the bounded formulation yields substantially smaller miss distances and terminal-angle errors when saturation is encountered. Unlike corresponding bounded miss-only guidance laws, the proposed law does not reduce to its unconstrained counterpart for minimum-phase missile dynamics because the acceleration command can saturate near the end of challenging engagements. The bounded law anticipates this saturation and compensates through earlier maneuvers.
ER -