Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 4 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Fuel-optimal Boost-Back Guidance via Successive Convexification with a Terminal Constraint for ReusableLaunch Vehicles

Abstract

This paper proposes a fuel-optimal boost-back guidance algorithm for reusable launch vehicles using successive convexification (SCvx). The guidance problem is formulated as a free-final-time optimal control problem with a terminal instantaneous impact point (IIP) constraint. This constraint depends only on the burnout position and velocity and enforces that the predicted ballistic impact point coincides with the target under a spherical-Earth, central-gravity model. By handling the coast analytically, the formulation confines trajectory discretization to the powered phase, reduces the problem size, and explicitly represents the bang-off structure. It also avoids the accumulation of discretization defects over the long coast and the need to resolve the burn-coast transition on a single-phase grid. Two terminal constraint formulations are considered: the closed-form Keplerian IIP and the eccentric-anomaly-based F&G solution. Their Jacobians are evaluated using complex-step differentiation. The algorithm is validated in a return-to-launch-site case study based on the Falcon 9 CRS-10 mission. Comparisons with a single-phase full-trajectory formulation, a closed-form guidance law incorporating the flight path angle rate, and an offline trajectory optimization benchmark assess the trade-off between computational cost and optimality. The results demonstrate near-optimal propellant consumption with reduced computational cost.

Related

  1. Optimal Guidance with Terminal Intercept-Angle Constraints and Acceleration Bounds
    Yoav Azaryahu, Vitaly Shaferman
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  2. Constraint-Lifted Sector-Constrained Guidance for Rear-Approach Interception
    Jhon Manuel Portella Delgado, Dennis S Bernstein, Ankit Goel
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  3. Quantitative Soft-to-Hard Terminal Constraint Convergence for the Heat Equation
    Sung-Sik Kwon
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  4. On the convexification of a bilinearly constrained set with a common variable
    Hyun-Ju Oh, Boshi Yang
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  5. Finite convexification by Minkowski summation
    Mark Meyer
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textGeometry & topologyarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{kim2026fueloptimal,
  title = {{Fuel-optimal Boost-Back Guidance via Successive Convexification with a Terminal Constraint for ReusableLaunch Vehicles}},
  author = {Mingyeom Kim and Changhyun Kang and Dohyun Lee and Byeong-Un Jo},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.28759},
  eprint = {2609.28759},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.28759},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Fuel-optimal Boost-Back Guidance via Successive Convexification with a Terminal Constraint for ReusableLaunch Vehicles
AU  - Mingyeom Kim
AU  - Changhyun Kang
AU  - Dohyun Lee
AU  - Byeong-Un Jo
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/23
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.28759
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.28759
AB  - This paper proposes a fuel-optimal boost-back guidance algorithm for reusable launch vehicles using successive convexification (SCvx). The guidance problem is formulated as a free-final-time optimal control problem with a terminal instantaneous impact point (IIP) constraint. This constraint depends only on the burnout position and velocity and enforces that the predicted ballistic impact point coincides with the target under a spherical-Earth, central-gravity model. By handling the coast analytically, the formulation confines trajectory discretization to the powered phase, reduces the problem size, and explicitly represents the bang-off structure. It also avoids the accumulation of discretization defects over the long coast and the need to resolve the burn-coast transition on a single-phase grid. Two terminal constraint formulations are considered: the closed-form Keplerian IIP and the eccentric-anomaly-based F&G solution. Their Jacobians are evaluated using complex-step differentiation. The algorithm is validated in a return-to-launch-site case study based on the Falcon 9 CRS-10 mission. Comparisons with a single-phase full-trajectory formulation, a closed-form guidance law incorporating the flight path angle rate, and an offline trajectory optimization benchmark assess the trade-off between computational cost and optimality. The results demonstrate near-optimal propellant consumption with reduced computational cost.
ER  -