Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
174,684 studies31 sourcesUpdated 51 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Sonny-ENS: demystifying machine-learning ensemble weather forecasting

Abstract

Every weather forecast is uncertain, and decisions from flood warnings to energy trading depend on how well that uncertainty is quantified. Machine-learning (ML) ensembles now quantify it better than the best physics-based ensemble, yet two things about them remain opaque: whether their skill requires hundreds to thousands of accelerator-days of training, and how a network with a simple source of randomness produces a spread that follows the flow. Here we introduce Sonny-ENS, an ensemble of three 68.9-million-parameter networks with Monte Carlo dropout, trained on the continuous ranked probability score (CRPS) in 2.7 A40 GPU-days. On 2022, it has a lower CRPS than the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts ensemble (ENS) on 96% of 570 targets and an 8.3% lower mean CRPS at lead times of 1-10 days. It outperforms the operational GenCast on 69% of the targets, and a 51-member, 15-day forecast takes 69 s on one GPU. Ablations identify the ingredients of this skill, and a Kolmogorov-Arnold sparse autoencoder shows that dropout injects uncertainty mainly in the tropics, whereas the spread grows where the atmosphere is baroclinically unstable (spatial correlation 0.91 with the Eady growth rate). Skillful probabilistic weather forecasts are therefore within reach of a single GPU server.

Related

  1. Weather forecasting in a changing climate: the rise of AI and Machine learning?
    Florence Rabier, Andrew Brown, Matthew Chantry +1
    Journal of the European Meteorological Society.Peer-reviewedCC BY5 citedAtmospheric science & meteorologyOpenAlex
  2. A Station-Based Evaluation of Machine Learning-based Weather Forecasting Models in Northern Norway
    Siyan Chen, Lars Uebbing, Eirik Mikal Samuelsen +5
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAtmospheric science & meteorologyarXiv
  3. Conditional-Risk Optimization and KKT Geometry of a Regime- and Horizon-Adaptive Probabilistic Ensemble for Local Weather Forecasting
    Boris V. Malozyomov, Nikita V. Martyushev, Denis V. Valuev +4
    MathematicsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Atmospheric science & meteorologyCrossref
  4. Uncertainty analysis of a machine learning-aided ensemble forecast for coastal flood maps
    Jeremy Rohmer, Sophie Lecacheux, Déborah Idier +5
    Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk AssessmentPeer-reviewedPublic domainFull text1 citedClimate scienceHAL
  5. Hybrid machine learning framework for drought forecasting: integration of LSBoost, RQNN, CNN-RNN, CNN-LSTM and advanced data decomposition
    Hatice Çıtakoğlu, Pınar Spor, Volkan Gündüz +1
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full text1 citedEnvironmental science & pollutionCrossref
BibTeX
@misc{cheon2026sonnyens,
  title = {{Sonny-ENS: demystifying machine-learning ensemble weather forecasting}},
  author = {Minjong Cheon},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2611.01614},
  eprint = {2611.01614},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.01614},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Sonny-ENS: demystifying machine-learning ensemble weather forecasting
AU  - Minjong Cheon
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/01
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2611.01614
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.01614
AB  - Every weather forecast is uncertain, and decisions from flood warnings to energy trading depend on how well that uncertainty is quantified. Machine-learning (ML) ensembles now quantify it better than the best physics-based ensemble, yet two things about them remain opaque: whether their skill requires hundreds to thousands of accelerator-days of training, and how a network with a simple source of randomness produces a spread that follows the flow. Here we introduce Sonny-ENS, an ensemble of three 68.9-million-parameter networks with Monte Carlo dropout, trained on the continuous ranked probability score (CRPS) in 2.7 A40 GPU-days. On 2022, it has a lower CRPS than the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts ensemble (ENS) on 96% of 570 targets and an 8.3% lower mean CRPS at lead times of 1-10 days. It outperforms the operational GenCast on 69% of the targets, and a 51-member, 15-day forecast takes 69 s on one GPU. Ablations identify the ingredients of this skill, and a Kolmogorov-Arnold sparse autoencoder shows that dropout injects uncertainty mainly in the tropics, whereas the spread grows where the atmosphere is baroclinically unstable (spatial correlation 0.91 with the Eady growth rate). Skillful probabilistic weather forecasts are therefore within reach of a single GPU server.
ER  -