Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
178,033 studies31 sourcesUpdated 3 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Mathematics

Conditional-Risk Optimization and KKT Geometry of a Regime- and Horizon-Adaptive Probabilistic Ensemble for Local Weather Forecasting

4 affiliations
  1. 1Department of Electrotechnical Complexes, Novosibirsk State Technical University, 630073 Novosibirsk, Russia
  2. 2Department of Information Technology, Tomsk Polytechnic University, 634050 Tomsk, Russia
  3. 3Yurga Technological Institute (Branch), Tomsk Polytechnic University, 652055 Yurga, Russia
  4. 4Department of Mechanical Engineering, Tomsk Polytechnic University, 634050 Tomsk, Russia

Abstract

A regime- and horizon-adaptive probabilistic ensemble is proposed for local multi-horizon weather forecasting. The theoretical formulation links conditional second-moment error matrices to posterior probabilities of latent atmospheric-state components, while the Soft_Final scheme combines horizon adaptation, regime-dependent weighting, stabilization, and soft posterior mixing. For the posterior-weighted quadratic model, we derive an exact excess-risk decomposition, a Karush–Kuhn–Tucker (KKT) optimality certificate, an active-boundary decomposition on the probability simplex, and deterministic spectral stability bounds. The experimental dataset comprises 5184 hourly meteorological observations and 1296 forecast records across nine lead times; confirmatory inference is based on six station–season blocks. After Holm correction, statistically significant superiority of Soft_Final over the globally fixed static ensemble is not established, whereas ablation analysis indicates that horizon adaptation contributes more consistently than additional regime conditioning. Probabilistic performance exhibits a substantive trade-off among coverage, interval width, and the continuous ranked probability score (CRPS). The main contribution is a rigorous separation of model optimality, operational approximation, and out-of-sample predictive error. Same-protocol comparisons with ensemble model output statistics (EMOS), Bayesian model averaging (BMA), quantile regression forests (QRFs), and residual conformal post-processing demonstrate competitive but non-uniform performance rather than universal dominance.

Related

  1. Graph-based probabilistic earthquake clustering and forecasting in Sumatra
    Giuseppe Petrillo, Stefania Gentili, Luca Dal Zilio
    TectonophysicsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeophysics & seismologyHAL
  2. Advancing Near-Term Water Quality Forecasting with Explainable Machine Learning and Probabilistic Uncertainty Quantification
    Rohit Shukla, Cayelan C. Carey, Adrienne Breef-Pilz +1
    ACS ES&T waterPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEnvironmental science & pollutionEurope PMC
  3. SDECast: Probabilistic Weather Forecasting in Continuous Time with Neural SDEs
    Maria Marchenko, Martin Andrae, Fredrik Lindsten +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAtmospheric science & meteorologyStatisticsarXiv
  4. Njord: A Probabilistic Graph Neural Network for Ensemble Ocean Forecasting
    Daniel Holmberg, Joel Oskarsson, Erik Wikingsson +2
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAtmospheric science & meteorologyarXiv
  5. Predictability-Guided Multiscale Probabilistic Forecasting of Wind Direction under Extreme Shear
    Hailong Shu
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textAtmospheric science & meteorologyarXiv
BibTeX
@article{malozyomov2026conditionalrisk,
  title = {{Conditional-Risk Optimization and KKT Geometry of a Regime- and Horizon-Adaptive Probabilistic Ensemble for Local Weather Forecasting}},
  author = {Boris V. Malozyomov and Nikita V. Martyushev and Denis V. Valuev and Svetlana N. Sorokova and Egor A. Efremenkov and Anton Y. Demin and Alexander V. Pogrebnoy},
  journal = {Mathematics},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3390/math14203711},
  url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/14/20/3711},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Conditional-Risk Optimization and KKT Geometry of a Regime- and Horizon-Adaptive Probabilistic Ensemble for Local Weather Forecasting
AU  - Boris V. Malozyomov
AU  - Nikita V. Martyushev
AU  - Denis V. Valuev
AU  - Svetlana N. Sorokova
AU  - Egor A. Efremenkov
AU  - Anton Y. Demin
AU  - Alexander V. Pogrebnoy
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/13
JO  - Mathematics
DO  - 10.3390/math14203711
UR  - https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/14/20/3711
AB  - A regime- and horizon-adaptive probabilistic ensemble is proposed for local multi-horizon weather forecasting. The theoretical formulation links conditional second-moment error matrices to posterior probabilities of latent atmospheric-state components, while the Soft_Final scheme combines horizon adaptation, regime-dependent weighting, stabilization, and soft posterior mixing. For the posterior-weighted quadratic model, we derive an exact excess-risk decomposition, a Karush–Kuhn–Tucker (KKT) optimality certificate, an active-boundary decomposition on the probability simplex, and deterministic spectral stability bounds. The experimental dataset comprises 5184 hourly meteorological observations and 1296 forecast records across nine lead times; confirmatory inference is based on six station–season blocks. After Holm correction, statistically significant superiority of Soft_Final over the globally fixed static ensemble is not established, whereas ablation analysis indicates that horizon adaptation contributes more consistently than additional regime conditioning. Probabilistic performance exhibits a substantive trade-off among coverage, interval width, and the continuous ranked probability score (CRPS). The main contribution is a rigorous separation of model optimality, operational approximation, and out-of-sample predictive error. Same-protocol comparisons with ensemble model output statistics (EMOS), Bayesian model averaging (BMA), quantile regression forests (QRFs), and residual conformal post-processing demonstrate competitive but non-uniform performance rather than universal dominance.
SN  - 2227-7390
ER  -