Delayed Retention of Technical Surgical Skills Following Virtual, Augmented, and Mixed-Reality Simulation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
- 1KIST Medical College and Teaching Hospital
Abstract
BackgroundExtended-reality simulation is widely used for technical surgical training, yet immediate gains do not establish that skills persist once practice stops.
ObjectiveTo characterize delayed technical-skill outcomes after virtual, augmented, or mixed-reality training and estimate the comparative effect at the first eligible uncontaminated delayed assessment.
MethodsPubMed/MEDLINE, Europe PMC, CENTRAL, ERIC, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from inception through May 5, 2026. Eligible studies enrolled surgical learners or practitioners, used virtual, augmented, or mixed reality for technical training, and measured objective performance at least seven days later. Pure retention was distinguished from maintenance and reacquisition. One endpoint per independent study family was selected. Standardized mean differences were expressed as Hedges g, oriented so positive values favored extended reality. Paule-Mandel random effects with Hartung-Knapp confidence intervals were primary.
ResultsThirty-four reports representing 33 studies (1,186 participants; 21 randomized trials) from 12 countries were included. Six studies (162 participants in selected arms) were pooled. The summary effect was g = 1.39 (95% CI -0.94 to 3.72; I{superscript 2} = 88.0%; {tau}{superscript 2} = 4.53); the 95% prediction interval was -5.04 to 7.81. Excluding the figure-derived estimate reduced the effect to g = 0.61 (95% CI -0.76 to 1.99). GRADE certainty for the primary outcome was very low. No pooled study assessed an interval of 90 days or longer.
ConclusionsDelayed technical advantages after extended-reality simulation were observed in some settings, but the comparative evidence does not define a precise or generalizable retention effect. Substantial heterogeneity, sparse transfer and longer-term evidence, comparator differences, and influence from one figure-derived estimate warrant cautious interpretation.
Related
- Retrieval-augmented generation in medicine: A scoping review of technical implementations, clinical applications, and ethical considerations
- Surgical explantation following early transcatheter aortic valve failure: Technical considerations for complex situations.
- Brain Gadolinium Biodistribution, Clearance, and Retention Following High-Dose Contrast-Agent Exposure in Mice: A Multimodal Study
- Head-mounted augmented reality in head and neck surgery: from technical innovation to clinical translation
- Multilayer fascia lata reconstruction for recurrent ventral cervical cerebrospinal fluid leak following anterior cervical surgery: A technical case report.
BibTeX
@misc{shamim2026delayed,
title = {{Delayed Retention of Technical Surgical Skills Following Virtual, Augmented, and Mixed-Reality Simulation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis}},
author = {F. Shamim and R. A. Hussain},
howpublished = {medRxiv},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.64898/2026.09.15.26363133},
url = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.15.26363133v1},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Delayed Retention of Technical Surgical Skills Following Virtual, Augmented, and Mixed-Reality Simulation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
AU - F. Shamim
AU - R. A. Hussain
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/15
PB - medRxiv
DO - 10.64898/2026.09.15.26363133
UR - https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.15.26363133v1
AB - BackgroundExtended-reality simulation is widely used for technical surgical training, yet immediate gains do not establish that skills persist once practice stops. ObjectiveTo characterize delayed technical-skill outcomes after virtual, augmented, or mixed-reality training and estimate the comparative effect at the first eligible uncontaminated delayed assessment. MethodsPubMed/MEDLINE, Europe PMC, CENTRAL, ERIC, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from inception through May 5, 2026. Eligible studies enrolled surgical learners or practitioners, used virtual, augmented, or mixed reality for technical training, and measured objective performance at least seven days later. Pure retention was distinguished from maintenance and reacquisition. One endpoint per independent study family was selected. Standardized mean differences were expressed as Hedges g, oriented so positive values favored extended reality. Paule-Mandel random effects with Hartung-Knapp confidence intervals were primary. ResultsThirty-four reports representing 33 studies (1,186 participants; 21 randomized trials) from 12 countries were included. Six studies (162 participants in selected arms) were pooled. The summary effect was g = 1.39 (95% CI -0.94 to 3.72; I{superscript 2} = 88.0%; {tau}{superscript 2} = 4.53); the 95% prediction interval was -5.04 to 7.81. Excluding the figure-derived estimate reduced the effect to g = 0.61 (95% CI -0.76 to 1.99). GRADE certainty for the primary outcome was very low. No pooled study assessed an interval of 90 days or longer. ConclusionsDelayed technical advantages after extended-reality simulation were observed in some settings, but the comparative evidence does not define a precise or generalizable retention effect. Substantial heterogeneity, sparse transfer and longer-term evidence, comparator differences, and influence from one figure-derived estimate warrant cautious interpretation.
ER -