Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 15 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0arXiv

Code Equivalence and Automorphism Groups of Weighted Superelliptic Codes

Abstract

We study permutation and monomial equivalence for one-point codes on weighted superelliptic curves. On strata where Hm≃ Z/nZ×Z/mZ acts regularly on the evaluation set, we prove that these codes are Cartesian character codes and determine their primal and dual minimum distances. We compute the projective monomial normalizer of the regular action and classify the compatible permutation and monomial equivalences through the induced actions on the defining sets. When d > n and m ≥ 2, the common permutation automorphism group of the full filtration is exactly Hm, and the regular action can be recovered from its two lowest nonconstant members. We determine the full permutation automorphism group in closed form at the top of the filtration and give a field-independent finite certificate for PAut ( CCs ) = Hm in the remaining primitive cases treated here. The hull dimension is bounded by the genus on every regular stratum, apart from the type (3,3,3). Explicit examples show that length, dimension, and hull dimension do not determine monomial equivalence, and that the hull profile together with the regular automorphism subgroup does not determine the curve up to isomorphism. As an application, we determine the corresponding hull-based invariants and punctured signatures used in support-splitting methods.

Related

  1. Hulls, linear equivalence, and weighted superelliptic codes
    Jurgen Mezinaj, Tanush Shaska
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAlgebra & number theoryarXiv
  2. Permutation automorphism groups of cyclic codes I: cyclotomic association schemes
    Yanni Wu, Ziqing Xiang
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsarXiv
  3. The permutation and automorphism groups of univariate multiplicity codes
    Eduardo Camps Moreno, Hiram H. López, Umberto Martínez-Peñas +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textGeneral mathematicsarXiv
  4. Bounding Selmer Groups of Superelliptic Jacobians via Class Groups
    Pengfei Wang
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAlgebra & number theoryarXiv
  5. On the lengths of MDS codes with a two-transitive permutation automorphism group
    Haihua Deng, Tao Feng, Andrey V. Vasil'ev
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAlgebra & number theoryCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{beshaj2026code,
  title = {{Code Equivalence and Automorphism Groups of Weighted Superelliptic Codes}},
  author = {Lubjana Beshaj and Tony Shaska},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.04856},
  eprint = {2610.04856},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.04856},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Code Equivalence and Automorphism Groups of Weighted Superelliptic Codes
AU  - Lubjana Beshaj
AU  - Tony Shaska
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/04
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.04856
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.04856
AB  - We study permutation and monomial equivalence for one-point codes on weighted superelliptic curves. On strata where H_m≃ Z/nZ×Z/mZ acts regularly on the evaluation set, we prove that these codes are Cartesian character codes and determine their primal and dual minimum distances. We compute the projective monomial normalizer of the regular action and classify the compatible permutation and monomial equivalences through the induced actions on the defining sets. When d > n and m ≥ 2, the common permutation automorphism group of the full filtration is exactly H_m, and the regular action can be recovered from its two lowest nonconstant members. We determine the full permutation automorphism group in closed form at the top of the filtration and give a field-independent finite certificate for PAut ( CC_s ) = H_m in the remaining primitive cases treated here. The hull dimension is bounded by the genus on every regular stratum, apart from the type (3,3,3). Explicit examples show that length, dimension, and hull dimension do not determine monomial equivalence, and that the hull profile together with the regular automorphism subgroup does not determine the curve up to isomorphism. As an application, we determine the corresponding hull-based invariants and punctured signatures used in support-splitting methods.
ER  -