Applying psychometrics to large language model simulated populations: recreating the HEXACO personality inventory experiment with generative agents
- 1The Alan Turing Institute , London, UK
Abstract
Generative agents powered by large language models (LLMs) demonstrate human-like characteristics through sophisticated natural language interactions. Their ability to assume roles and personalities based on predefined character biographies has positioned them as cost-effective substitutes for human participants in social science research. This paper explores the validity of such persona-based agents1 in representing human populations; we recreate the HEXACO personality inventory experiment by surveying 310 GPT-4 powered agents, conducting factor analysis on their responses, and comparing these results to the original findings presented by Ashton et al. (Ashton et al. 2004 J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 87, 707–721 (doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.5.707). Our results found (i) a coherent and reliable personality structure was recoverable from the agents’ responses demonstrating partial alignment to the HEXACO framework, (ii) the derived personality dimensions were consistent and reliable within GPT-4, when coupled with a sufficiently curated population, and (iii) cross-model analysis revealed variability in personality profiling, suggesting model-specific biases and limitations. We discuss the practical considerations and challenges encountered during the experiment. This study contributes to the ongoing discourse on the potential benefits and limitations of using generative agents in social science research and provides useful guidance on designing consistent and representative agent personas to maximize coverage and representation of human personality traits, while highlighting potential limitations of applying human psychometric frameworks to generative agents.
Related
- Flavorists Are Recreating Smoke to Save Europe’s Snacks
- Fear without a dose-response: real-time crowdsourced psychometrics show a moderate earthquake’s psychological footprint is decoupled from shaking intensity in an anticipation-primed megacity
- Adolescent-Reported National Norms, Psychometrics, and Clinical Considerations for the Nationwide Quality of Life Scale (NQLS)
- Canine-Assisted Interventions and Symptoms Associated with Borderline Personality Disorder: A Scoping Review
- Piloting New Medications for Borderline Personality Disorder: The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Psychopharmacological Research
BibTeX
@article{mercer2026applying,
title = {{Applying psychometrics to large language model simulated populations: recreating the HEXACO personality inventory experiment with generative agents}},
author = {Sarah Mercer and Daniel Martin and Phil Swatton},
journal = {Royal Society Open Science},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1098/rsos.251802},
url = {https://royalsocietypublishing.org/rsos/article/13/10/251802/483818/Applying-psychometrics-to-large-language-model},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Applying psychometrics to large language model simulated populations: recreating the HEXACO personality inventory experiment with generative agents
AU - Sarah Mercer
AU - Daniel Martin
AU - Phil Swatton
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/21
JO - Royal Society Open Science
DO - 10.1098/rsos.251802
UR - https://royalsocietypublishing.org/rsos/article/13/10/251802/483818/Applying-psychometrics-to-large-language-model
AB - Generative agents powered by large language models (LLMs) demonstrate human-like characteristics through sophisticated natural language interactions. Their ability to assume roles and personalities based on predefined character biographies has positioned them as cost-effective substitutes for human participants in social science research. This paper explores the validity of such persona-based agents1 in representing human populations; we recreate the HEXACO personality inventory experiment by surveying 310 GPT-4 powered agents, conducting factor analysis on their responses, and comparing these results to the original findings presented by Ashton et al. (Ashton et al. 2004 J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 87, 707–721 (doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.5.707). Our results found (i) a coherent and reliable personality structure was recoverable from the agents’ responses demonstrating partial alignment to the HEXACO framework, (ii) the derived personality dimensions were consistent and reliable within GPT-4, when coupled with a sufficiently curated population, and (iii) cross-model analysis revealed variability in personality profiling, suggesting model-specific biases and limitations. We discuss the practical considerations and challenges encountered during the experiment. This study contributes to the ongoing discourse on the potential benefits and limitations of using generative agents in social science research and provides useful guidance on designing consistent and representative agent personas to maximize coverage and representation of human personality traits, while highlighting potential limitations of applying human psychometric frameworks to generative agents.
SN - 2054-5703
ER -