Adolescent-Reported National Norms, Psychometrics, and Clinical Considerations for the Nationwide Quality of Life Scale (NQLS)
- 1Nationwide Children's Hospital
Abstract
ObjectiveThe Nationwide Quality of Life Scale (NQLS) is a brief, public-domain, youth self-report measure designed for quality of life (QoL) reporting in measurement-based care (MBC). Preliminary psychometric support comes from a sample of treatment-seeking youth, but its use in a population-based sample has not been evaluated. This study examined the NQLS psychometric performance in a U.S. nationally representative sample and develops national norms, score interpretation guidance, and clinical significance benchmarks.
MethodA nationally representative sample of 1,008 youth ages 12-18 completed the NQLS as part of a larger survey battery. Analyses included exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, reliability, validity, item response theory, and generalized additive models for location, scale, and shape (GAMLSS) norming. We integrated these results with clinical data from 1,200 youth seeking treatment at a large Midwestern childrens hospital to estimate clinical significance benchmarks and compare between groups.
ResultsOne- and two-factor solutions were evaluated. The NQLS demonstrated good internal consistency and convergent validity, with distinguishable "life" and "school" factors. Normative percentiles were generally stable across age, with modest narrowing at the youngest and oldest ages. Normative-sample youth showed raw score and latent trait estimates significantly higher than clinical-sample youth.
ConclusionsThe NQLS provides reliable and valid measurement of QoL in a nationally representative sample. Although two structural factors were identified, the composite score is recommended for clinical decision-making. National norms and clinical significance benchmarks may facilitate MBC applications of the NQLS. Future research should evaluate its performance across additional care settings.
Related
- Prevalence and factors associated with adolescent-reported food insecurity in an urban Spanish setting: a cross-sectional study
- Higher general practice-reported health condition rates among adolescent and young adult (18−39 years) cancer survivors up to 22 years after diagnosis in the Netherlands: a retrospective cohort study
- Professional engagement and implementation appraisal in China’s national nutrition week: a nationwide cross-sectional study
- Regional disparities in lung cancer surgery and survival in South Korea: a nationwide population-based retrospective cohort study using linked cancer registry and national health insurance data
- National trends in chronic kidney disease prevalence by sleep duration in South Korea, 2007 to 2022 : A nationwide cross-sectional study
BibTeX
@misc{nienaber2026adolescentreported,
title = {{Adolescent-Reported National Norms, Psychometrics, and Clinical Considerations for the Nationwide Quality of Life Scale (NQLS)}},
author = {E. A. Nienaber and Y. A. Liu and E. A. Youngstrom and M. A. Fristad},
howpublished = {medRxiv},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.64898/2026.09.25.26363826},
url = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.25.26363826v1},
note = {CC BY-NC},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Adolescent-Reported National Norms, Psychometrics, and Clinical Considerations for the Nationwide Quality of Life Scale (NQLS)
AU - E. A. Nienaber
AU - Y. A. Liu
AU - E. A. Youngstrom
AU - M. A. Fristad
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/25
PB - medRxiv
DO - 10.64898/2026.09.25.26363826
UR - https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.25.26363826v1
AB - ObjectiveThe Nationwide Quality of Life Scale (NQLS) is a brief, public-domain, youth self-report measure designed for quality of life (QoL) reporting in measurement-based care (MBC). Preliminary psychometric support comes from a sample of treatment-seeking youth, but its use in a population-based sample has not been evaluated. This study examined the NQLS psychometric performance in a U.S. nationally representative sample and develops national norms, score interpretation guidance, and clinical significance benchmarks. MethodA nationally representative sample of 1,008 youth ages 12-18 completed the NQLS as part of a larger survey battery. Analyses included exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, reliability, validity, item response theory, and generalized additive models for location, scale, and shape (GAMLSS) norming. We integrated these results with clinical data from 1,200 youth seeking treatment at a large Midwestern childrens hospital to estimate clinical significance benchmarks and compare between groups. ResultsOne- and two-factor solutions were evaluated. The NQLS demonstrated good internal consistency and convergent validity, with distinguishable "life" and "school" factors. Normative percentiles were generally stable across age, with modest narrowing at the youngest and oldest ages. Normative-sample youth showed raw score and latent trait estimates significantly higher than clinical-sample youth. ConclusionsThe NQLS provides reliable and valid measurement of QoL in a nationally representative sample. Although two structural factors were identified, the composite score is recommended for clinical decision-making. National norms and clinical significance benchmarks may facilitate MBC applications of the NQLS. Future research should evaluate its performance across additional care settings.
ER -