Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
194,161 studies31 sourcesUpdated 56 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDJournal of genetic counseling

Genetic Testing Station Provides Increased Access to Germline Genetic Testing for Pediatric Oncology Patients.

3 more authors
6 affiliations
  1. 1Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA.
  2. 2Cancer Services, UCLA Health, Los Angeles, California, USA.
  3. 3Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA.
  4. 4Division of Clinical Genetics, Department of Human Genetics, UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA.
  5. 5Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA.
  6. 6Department of Orthopedic Surgery, UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA.

Abstract

Germline genetic testing in the pediatric oncology population remains under-utilized, despite evidence that 10%-15% of these patients have an underlying genetic cause. Identifying patients with a genetic predisposition can affect diagnosis, treatment, and future surveillance of the patient and family. Genetic testing station (GTS) is an educational video for patients and families describing genetic testing. This study tested the effect of GTS compared to in-person counseling on the rate of germline genetic testing, genetic testing knowledge, and decisional conflict in a diverse patient setting. Participants recruited from the pediatric solid tumor service received counseling via GTS, while participants recruited from the multidisciplinary cancer predisposition program received in-person counseling. Participants completed surveys on genetic testing knowledge, health literacy, and psychosocial impact before and after genetic counseling. Baseline rates of pediatric genetic testing were established via chart review. There were 28 participants in the GTS arm and 11 in the in-person counseling arm. The arms had similar ethnic and racial backgrounds and rates of health literacy. There was no significant difference in the change in genetic testing knowledge pre- and post-intervention in the two arms individually or between the two arms of the study. There were significantly higher rates of germline genetic testing with the introduction of GTS compared to baseline rates in the pediatric oncology population. Our study demonstrates that GTS is a feasible approach to provide pre-test genetic counseling in a pediatric solid tumor clinic and may be an alternative to in-person counseling. Its implementation led to an increase in germline genetic testing rates in the pediatric solid tumor program.

Related

  1. Unmet social needs in pediatric patients with inflammatory bowel disease linked to increased risk of missed appointments
    Kayla Pryce, Faria Hasan, Samantha Levano +5
    JPGN reportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGenetics & genomicsEurope PMCEurope PMCPMC
  2. Cumulative cgMLST provides increased discrimination of nested phylogenetic groups.
    Armen Ovsepian, Jose F Delgado-Blas, Martin Rethoret-Pasty +3
    Genome medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull text1 citedGeneral biochemistryGenetics & genomicsEurope PMCDOAJ
  3. Germline Genomic and DNA Methylation Differences Between MGUS and Multiple Myeloma Among Patients of African Ancestry.
    Jing Han, Sophie Hongfei Liu, Shahram Arsang-Jang +14
    CellsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textCell biologyEurope PMC
  4. Neurokinin 1 receptor blockade is associated with increased survival of patients with C. difficile infection
    L. Zhao, M. Liu, S. Wang +8
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textMicrobiologybioRxiv
  5. Patients as Co‐Researchers in Oncology: A Qualitative Exploration of Participatory Governance
    Yaël Busnel, Aline Rollet, Aline Cristiani +3
    Health ExpectationsPeer-reviewedCC BYGeneral biologyEpidemiology & public healthHAL
BibTeX
@article{hamilton2026genetic,
  title = {{Genetic Testing Station Provides Increased Access to Germline Genetic Testing for Pediatric Oncology Patients.}},
  author = {Camille Hamilton and Emily Duan and Mariana Niell-Swiller and Franceska Bhansali and Alyssa Hoover and Stephanie Bottomley and Naghmeh Dorrani and Christina Palmer and Marisa Lewis and Kathy Woo and Bianca Russell and Julian A Martinez-Agosto and Beth Karlan and Noah Federman and Vivian Y Chang},
  journal = {Journal of genetic counseling},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1002/jgc4.70311},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42958579},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Genetic Testing Station Provides Increased Access to Germline Genetic Testing for Pediatric Oncology Patients.
AU  - Camille Hamilton
AU  - Emily Duan
AU  - Mariana Niell-Swiller
AU  - Franceska Bhansali
AU  - Alyssa Hoover
AU  - Stephanie Bottomley
AU  - Naghmeh Dorrani
AU  - Christina Palmer
AU  - Marisa Lewis
AU  - Kathy Woo
AU  - Bianca Russell
AU  - Julian A Martinez-Agosto
AU  - Beth Karlan
AU  - Noah Federman
AU  - Vivian Y Chang
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/29
JO  - Journal of genetic counseling
DO  - 10.1002/jgc4.70311
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42958579
AB  - Germline genetic testing in the pediatric oncology population remains under-utilized, despite evidence that 10%-15% of these patients have an underlying genetic cause. Identifying patients with a genetic predisposition can affect diagnosis, treatment, and future surveillance of the patient and family. Genetic testing station (GTS) is an educational video for patients and families describing genetic testing. This study tested the effect of GTS compared to in-person counseling on the rate of germline genetic testing, genetic testing knowledge, and decisional conflict in a diverse patient setting. Participants recruited from the pediatric solid tumor service received counseling via GTS, while participants recruited from the multidisciplinary cancer predisposition program received in-person counseling. Participants completed surveys on genetic testing knowledge, health literacy, and psychosocial impact before and after genetic counseling. Baseline rates of pediatric genetic testing were established via chart review. There were 28 participants in the GTS arm and 11 in the in-person counseling arm. The arms had similar ethnic and racial backgrounds and rates of health literacy. There was no significant difference in the change in genetic testing knowledge pre- and post-intervention in the two arms individually or between the two arms of the study. There were significantly higher rates of germline genetic testing with the introduction of GTS compared to baseline rates in the pediatric oncology population. Our study demonstrates that GTS is a feasible approach to provide pre-test genetic counseling in a pediatric solid tumor clinic and may be an alternative to in-person counseling. Its implementation led to an increase in germline genetic testing rates in the pediatric solid tumor program.
SN  - 1059-7700
SN  - 1573-3599
ER  -