Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 54 min ago
PreprintCC BYbioRxiv

The Role of Visual Imagery in Face Recognition and Confidence Revisited: New Evidence from Aphantasia, Sampling Context Effects, and a Meta-Analysis

  1. 1Otto-von-Guericke University, Medical Faculty, Magdeburg, Germany

Abstract

The absence of voluntary visual imagery, known as aphantasia, offers a unique lens into the role of visual imagery in visual memory processes such as face recognition. While aphantasics often report difficulties, behavioral differences in standard tasks have generally been small. One possibility is that the contribution of visual imagery becomes apparent only when face recognition is especially demanding. We compared age- and gender-matched aphantasics and typical imagers on the more challenging long-form version of the Cambridge Face Memory Test (CFMT+) and on a measure of inverted face recognition. We also included tasks assessing object recognition and face perception. No group differences emerged for face perception or object recognition. By contrast, typical imagers outperformed aphantasics under high visual and mnemonic demands in face recognition in the laboratory cohort, particularly at the highest difficulty level of the CFMT+ and in inverted face recognition. This effect was attenuated or even absent in the online cohort. Drift-diffusion modelling indicated that this discrepancy was primarily driven by reduced response caution in online typical imagers. A meta-analysis of published short-form CFMT studies (total N = 432) revealed a moderate and reliable advantage for typical imagers (hedges g [≤] 0.41). Finally, across cohorts and tasks, aphantasics reported consistently lower subjective confidence, independent of accuracy. Overall, these findings suggest that visual imagery benefits face recognition, and highlight the need for caution in online testing, the predominant approach in aphantasia research.

Related

  1. Dissociable episodic memory performance and subjective experience across the aphantasia imagery spectrum
    W. Duckett, J. Simons
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textNeurosciencebioRxiv
  2. Grounding-Specific Effects of Valence in Word Recognition: Evidence from Pain-Related Language.
    Eleonora Borelli, Riccardo Costantini, Elena Bandieri +3
    PsyArXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textNeuroscienceOSF
  3. Evidence-resolved benchmarks separate biological context recognition from direct-partner specificity in protein interaction models
    H. Cheng, C. Sun, C. Ye +2
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textBioinformatics & computational biologybioRxiv
  4. An orthographic advantage in spoken word recognition: Behavioral and ERP evidence from cross- and within-modal priming in Korean
    Joonwoo Kim, Solbin Lee, Kichun Nam
    PsyArXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textNeuroscienceOSF
  5. Robust evidence for theta-band rhythmicity in behavior across two dense-sampling datasets
    Mengting Xu, Esperanza Badaya, Mehdi Senoussi +1
    Communications PsychologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full text1 citedNeurosciencePMC
BibTeX
@misc{koenigsmark2026role,
  title = {{The Role of Visual Imagery in Face Recognition and Confidence Revisited: New Evidence from Aphantasia, Sampling Context Effects, and a Meta-Analysis}},
  author = {V. T. Koenigsmark and M.-P. Stenner and R. R. Reeder and E. Azanon},
  howpublished = {bioRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = jul,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.07.01.734716},
  url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.07.01.734716v2},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - The Role of Visual Imagery in Face Recognition and Confidence Revisited: New Evidence from Aphantasia, Sampling Context Effects, and a Meta-Analysis
AU  - V. T. Koenigsmark
AU  - M.-P. Stenner
AU  - R. R. Reeder
AU  - E. Azanon
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/07/01
PB  - bioRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.07.01.734716
UR  - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.07.01.734716v2
AB  - The absence of voluntary visual imagery, known as aphantasia, offers a unique lens into the role of visual imagery in visual memory processes such as face recognition. While aphantasics often report difficulties, behavioral differences in standard tasks have generally been small. One possibility is that the contribution of visual imagery becomes apparent only when face recognition is especially demanding. We compared age- and gender-matched aphantasics and typical imagers on the more challenging long-form version of the Cambridge Face Memory Test (CFMT+) and on a measure of inverted face recognition. We also included tasks assessing object recognition and face perception. No group differences emerged for face perception or object recognition. By contrast, typical imagers outperformed aphantasics under high visual and mnemonic demands in face recognition in the laboratory cohort, particularly at the highest difficulty level of the CFMT+ and in inverted face recognition. This effect was attenuated or even absent in the online cohort. Drift-diffusion modelling indicated that this discrepancy was primarily driven by reduced response caution in online typical imagers. A meta-analysis of published short-form CFMT studies (total N = 432) revealed a moderate and reliable advantage for typical imagers (hedges g [≤] 0.41). Finally, across cohorts and tasks, aphantasics reported consistently lower subjective confidence, independent of accuracy. Overall, these findings suggest that visual imagery benefits face recognition, and highlight the need for caution in online testing, the predominant approach in aphantasia research.
ER  -