Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
206,690 studies31 sourcesUpdated 20 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDAnnals of joint

Enabling technology in total knee arthroplasty: current concepts in 2026.

  • Kristen I Barton1,2
  • Riley J Boyle2
  • Douglas A Dennis1,3,4,5
  • Charlie Yang1
5 affiliations
  1. 1Colorado Joint Replacement, AdventHealth, Denver, CO, USA.
  2. 2School of Physical Therapy, Western University, London, Canada.
  3. 3Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, University of Denver, Denver, CO, USA.
  4. 4Department of Orthopaedics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, CO, USA.
  5. 5Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA.
Read full textPDFDOICite

Abstract

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) instrumentation and surgical techniques have significantly evolved over the past twenty years from conventional manual tools to including enabling technology, and will continue to advance at an exponential rate. Advancements in TKA technologies were first developed to aid the surgeon in refining surgical planning, improving surgical accuracy, and enhancing decision making. Yet the advancements in TKA technology within the past decade, specifically robotics, have yet to translate into significant clinical improvements for patients. With the goal of improving patient satisfaction and functional outcomes, there is a growing role of enabling technologies in refining alignment strategies for TKA This review comprehensively evaluates the impact of enabling TKA technology. The review discusses the role of enabling technology in 2026, including computer assisted navigation, robotic-assisted navigation (full active vs. semi-active robotic TKA systems), patient-specific instrumentation, intraoperative pressure sensors, augmented and virtual reality technology, 3D printing technology, digital health tools, and artificial intelligence applications in TKA. While enabling technologies improve accuracy and intraoperative decision-making, long-term superiority in clinical outcomes is not yet established for many enabling TKA technologies. Additional high-quality studies with long-term follow up are warranted on utilizing enabling technology with long-term follow up on patient reported outcomes, implant survivorship, and cost-effectiveness.

Related

  1. The hospital cost of primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty performed with traditional instrumentation: a Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing (TDABC) benchmark analysis in the era of digital enabling technology
    Hugo Barret, Amanda Vazquez, Ruchita Dholakia +5
    Journal of Shoulder and Elbow ArthroplastyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textSurgery & anaesthesiaPMCEurope PMC
  2. Supraspinatus management in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humerus fractures: current evidence and practical considerations.
    Tanawan Kongmalai, Pinkawas Kongmalai
    Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplastyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMC
  3. Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty in the Setting of an Intact Rotator Cuff: A Contemporary Review of Current Indications, Outcomes, and Surgical Considerations
    Liam H. Wong, Benjamin M. Lurie, Michael R. Davies
    Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textSurgery & anaesthesiaPMC
  4. Transradial Coronary Angiography and Intervention: Current Concepts and Future Directions
    Gabriela M. Diaz, Edwin A. Takahashi, Ion S. Jovin +3
    Reviews in Cardiovascular MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textCardiovascular medicinePMC
  5. Pulsed field ablation: from concepts to technology.
    Ante Anić, Antoni Ivorra, Brendan Koop +2
    Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of CardiologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textCardiovascular medicineEurope PMC

Cite

BibTeXRIS
BibTeX
@article{barton2026enabling,
  title = {{Enabling technology in total knee arthroplasty: current concepts in 2026.}},
  author = {Kristen I Barton and Riley J Boyle and Douglas A Dennis and Charlie Yang},
  journal = {Annals of joint},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.21037/aoj-2026-0026},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42999758},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Enabling technology in total knee arthroplasty: current concepts in 2026.
AU  - Kristen I Barton
AU  - Riley J Boyle
AU  - Douglas A Dennis
AU  - Charlie Yang
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/21
JO  - Annals of joint
DO  - 10.21037/aoj-2026-0026
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42999758
AB  - Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) instrumentation and surgical techniques have significantly evolved over the past twenty years from conventional manual tools to including enabling technology, and will continue to advance at an exponential rate. Advancements in TKA technologies were first developed to aid the surgeon in refining surgical planning, improving surgical accuracy, and enhancing decision making. Yet the advancements in TKA technology within the past decade, specifically robotics, have yet to translate into significant clinical improvements for patients. With the goal of improving patient satisfaction and functional outcomes, there is a growing role of enabling technologies in refining alignment strategies for TKA This review comprehensively evaluates the impact of enabling TKA technology. The review discusses the role of enabling technology in 2026, including computer assisted navigation, robotic-assisted navigation (full active vs. semi-active robotic TKA systems), patient-specific instrumentation, intraoperative pressure sensors, augmented and virtual reality technology, 3D printing technology, digital health tools, and artificial intelligence applications in TKA. While enabling technologies improve accuracy and intraoperative decision-making, long-term superiority in clinical outcomes is not yet established for many enabling TKA technologies. Additional high-quality studies with long-term follow up are warranted on utilizing enabling technology with long-term follow up on patient reported outcomes, implant survivorship, and cost-effectiveness.
SN  - 2415-6809
ER  -