A Retrospective Cohort Study of Distal Biceps Brachii Tendon Rupture and Subsequent Repair Methods: A Comparison of Two Combined Treatment Pathways.
7 affiliations
- 1Orthopedics and Trauma, University Hospital Wishaw, Lanarkshire, GBR.
- 2Orthopedics and Trauma, Bon Secours Hospital Tralee, Tralee, IRL.
- 3Surgery, Great Western Hospital, Swindon, GBR.
- 4General Surgery, University Hospital Hairmyres, Lanarkshire, GBR.
- 5Orthopedics and Trauma, Cardiff University, Cardiff, GBR.
- 6Orthopedics and Trauma, South West Orthopaedics and University of Exeter, Exeter, GBR.
- 7Orthopedics and Trauma, Cwm Taf Morgannwg University Health Board, Cardiff, GBR.
Abstract
Background Distal biceps brachii tendon rupture is an uncommon injury that is predominantly caused by excessive eccentric force to a flexed elbow. Operative repair is generally preferred to restore function, with a variety of surgical fixation techniques and postoperative rehabilitation protocols currently employed but with no clear consensus regarding the optimal approach. Comparative evidence evaluating surgical techniques remains limited. Objective The objective of this study is to compare two combined treatment pathways for distal biceps tendon repair using postoperative complications such as rerupture rates to compare postoperative outcomes to complication profiles. Methods All patients undergoing distal biceps repair in a single center in Wales, United Kingdom, between 2018 and 2022 were included. Patients were operated on by one of two surgeons. Information was gathered from electronic patient records and radiographic images. Demographics including age, gender, hand dominance, occupation, the mechanism of injury, and surgical intervention were recorded. Clinic letters were reviewed to determine the incidence of postoperative function and complications. Results Forty-four men were included with a median age of 45 years. All patients reported eccentric contraction as their mechanism of injury. The injury affected the dominant upper limb in all 44 patients (100%). The median time to surgery after imaging was 24 days. In the Surgeon 1 cohort, lateral cutaneous nerve (LCN) numbness was documented in 15 patients (50.0%) and elbow stiffness in six patients (20.0%). In the Surgeon 2 cohort, LCN paresthesia occurred in four patients (28.6%), stiffness in three patients (21.4%), and superficial radial nerve (SRN) paresthesia in two patients (14.3%). One patient required a revision of their biceps tendon repair (2%). All but one patient in each cohort achieved complete functional resolution by three months postoperatively. Conclusions The operative management of distal biceps rupture in this unit demonstrates similar postoperative outcomes from both treatment pathways.
Related
- Combined and simultaneous use of Nefecon and irbesartan in treatment-naïve primary IgA nephropathy : A retrospective study
- Evaluating treatment efficacy for Iliotibial Band Syndrome: A comparison of combined foam rolling and stretching with strengthening exercises versus strengthening alone in athletes
- Cytoreductive cystectomy combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in the treatment of metastatic bladder cancer: A retrospective comparative study.
- Navigating Treatment Pathways in Diabetic Foot Infection: A Practical Retrospective Analysis of Healing Predictors and the WIfI System.
- Combined Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension score, an integrated severity and treatment-oriented tool for idiopathic intracranial hypertension: a retrospective cohort study
BibTeX
@article{hill2026retrospective,
title = {{A Retrospective Cohort Study of Distal Biceps Brachii Tendon Rupture and Subsequent Repair Methods: A Comparison of Two Combined Treatment Pathways.}},
author = {Niall E Hill and Peadar A Mac Suibhne and Ryan J Browne and Carla J Foxworthy and Adam Reaney and Frank S Davis and Awen Iorwerth and Dai Morgan},
journal = {Cureus},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.7759/cureus.116557},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42899293},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - A Retrospective Cohort Study of Distal Biceps Brachii Tendon Rupture and Subsequent Repair Methods: A Comparison of Two Combined Treatment Pathways.
AU - Niall E Hill
AU - Peadar A Mac Suibhne
AU - Ryan J Browne
AU - Carla J Foxworthy
AU - Adam Reaney
AU - Frank S Davis
AU - Awen Iorwerth
AU - Dai Morgan
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/19
JO - Cureus
DO - 10.7759/cureus.116557
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42899293
AB - Background Distal biceps brachii tendon rupture is an uncommon injury that is predominantly caused by excessive eccentric force to a flexed elbow. Operative repair is generally preferred to restore function, with a variety of surgical fixation techniques and postoperative rehabilitation protocols currently employed but with no clear consensus regarding the optimal approach. Comparative evidence evaluating surgical techniques remains limited. Objective The objective of this study is to compare two combined treatment pathways for distal biceps tendon repair using postoperative complications such as rerupture rates to compare postoperative outcomes to complication profiles. Methods All patients undergoing distal biceps repair in a single center in Wales, United Kingdom, between 2018 and 2022 were included. Patients were operated on by one of two surgeons. Information was gathered from electronic patient records and radiographic images. Demographics including age, gender, hand dominance, occupation, the mechanism of injury, and surgical intervention were recorded. Clinic letters were reviewed to determine the incidence of postoperative function and complications. Results Forty-four men were included with a median age of 45 years. All patients reported eccentric contraction as their mechanism of injury. The injury affected the dominant upper limb in all 44 patients (100%). The median time to surgery after imaging was 24 days. In the Surgeon 1 cohort, lateral cutaneous nerve (LCN) numbness was documented in 15 patients (50.0%) and elbow stiffness in six patients (20.0%). In the Surgeon 2 cohort, LCN paresthesia occurred in four patients (28.6%), stiffness in three patients (21.4%), and superficial radial nerve (SRN) paresthesia in two patients (14.3%). One patient required a revision of their biceps tendon repair (2%). All but one patient in each cohort achieved complete functional resolution by three months postoperatively. Conclusions The operative management of distal biceps rupture in this unit demonstrates similar postoperative outcomes from both treatment pathways.
SN - 2168-8184
ER -