Evaluating treatment efficacy for Iliotibial Band Syndrome: A comparison of combined foam rolling and stretching with strengthening exercises versus strengthening alone in athletes
- 1School of Sport Sciences, Shahrood University of Technology, Shahrood, Semnan, Iran
- 2Department of Sport Science, University College of Omran and Tosseeh, Hamadan, Iran
Abstract
Background Iliotibial Band Syndrome (ITBS) lacks effective conservative treatment protocols, often relying on expert opinion without addressing individual factors. This study compared the effectiveness of integrating foam rolling and stretching exercises with strengthening routines versus strengthening exercises alone in athletes with ITBS. Twenty athletes with confirmed ITBS (11 males, 9 females; mean age: 33.6 ± 9.5 years) were randomized into two groups: the Integrated Training Group (ITG, n = 10) and the Strengthening-Focused Group (SFG, n = 10). Both underwent 24 sessions over eight weeks intervention, lasting 25–30 minutes per session. Outcomes included a primary measure of pain intensity (Visual Analog Scale) and secondary measures of lower extremity function (LEFS), hip abductor strength, iliotibial band flexibility, and quality of life (SF-36), were measured pre- and post-intervention. The ITG showed significantly greater improvements in pain reduction (79.7% vs. 81.0% reduction, p = 0.02), lower extremity function (25.7% vs. 21% improvement, p = 0.02), iliotibial band flexibility (59.4% vs. 1.7% improvement, p = 0.001), and overall QoL (19.9% vs. 12.6% improvement, p = 0.006) compared to the SFG. However, no significant differences were noted in hip abductor strength or physical and psychological QoL components (p > 0.05). Based on the sample examined, integrating foam rolling and stretching with strengthening exercises versus strengthening exercises alone resulted in greater improvements in pain, lower extremity physical function, iliotibial band flexibility, and overall QoL. However, additional studies with larger sample sizes and in other populations are needed before definitive conclusions can be reached.
Related
- Strengthening healthy aging through community-based integrated care: A study protocol evaluating functional decline and quality of life among middle-aged and elderly tribals in Jharkhand
- Comparison of Body Condition, Milk Production and Animal Movements Between Sopravissana and Comisana Sheep: An Approach to Evaluating Breed Suitability for Sustainable Farming in Central Italy.
- Evaluating Upadacitinib in the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Active Ulcerative Colitis: Design, Development, and Potential Position in Therapy
- Evaluating the impact and cost-effectiveness of typhoid conjugate vaccine schedules across diverse settings: A multi-model comparison
- Null-model treatment of the sensory-motor boundary changes an evolutionary connectome comparison
BibTeX
@article{naderi2026evaluating,
title = {{Evaluating treatment efficacy for Iliotibial Band Syndrome: A comparison of combined foam rolling and stretching with strengthening exercises versus strengthening alone in athletes}},
author = {Aynollah Naderi and Shanaz Azizi},
journal = {PLOS One},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0360760},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0360760},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Evaluating treatment efficacy for Iliotibial Band Syndrome: A comparison of combined foam rolling and stretching with strengthening exercises versus strengthening alone in athletes
AU - Aynollah Naderi
AU - Shanaz Azizi
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/27
JO - PLOS One
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0360760
UR - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0360760
AB - Background Iliotibial Band Syndrome (ITBS) lacks effective conservative treatment protocols, often relying on expert opinion without addressing individual factors. This study compared the effectiveness of integrating foam rolling and stretching exercises with strengthening routines versus strengthening exercises alone in athletes with ITBS. Twenty athletes with confirmed ITBS (11 males, 9 females; mean age: 33.6 ± 9.5 years) were randomized into two groups: the Integrated Training Group (ITG, n = 10) and the Strengthening-Focused Group (SFG, n = 10). Both underwent 24 sessions over eight weeks intervention, lasting 25–30 minutes per session. Outcomes included a primary measure of pain intensity (Visual Analog Scale) and secondary measures of lower extremity function (LEFS), hip abductor strength, iliotibial band flexibility, and quality of life (SF-36), were measured pre- and post-intervention. The ITG showed significantly greater improvements in pain reduction (79.7% vs. 81.0% reduction, p = 0.02), lower extremity function (25.7% vs. 21% improvement, p = 0.02), iliotibial band flexibility (59.4% vs. 1.7% improvement, p = 0.001), and overall QoL (19.9% vs. 12.6% improvement, p = 0.006) compared to the SFG. However, no significant differences were noted in hip abductor strength or physical and psychological QoL components (p > 0.05). Based on the sample examined, integrating foam rolling and stretching with strengthening exercises versus strengthening exercises alone resulted in greater improvements in pain, lower extremity physical function, iliotibial band flexibility, and overall QoL. However, additional studies with larger sample sizes and in other populations are needed before definitive conclusions can be reached.
SN - 1932-6203
ER -