SAE Relation Theory Paper 7: Why Still Relate / SAE 关系论 Paper 7: 为什么仍要关系

@misc{qin2026relation,
  title = {{SAE Relation Theory Paper 7: Why Still Relate / SAE 关系论 Paper 7: 为什么仍要关系}},
  author = {Han Qin},
  howpublished = {Zenodo},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.5281/zenodo.23554948},
  url = {https://zenodo.org/records/23554948},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}

TY  - UNPB
TI  - SAE Relation Theory Paper 7: Why Still Relate / SAE 关系论 Paper 7: 为什么仍要关系
AU  - Han Qin
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/22
PB  - Zenodo
DO  - 10.5281/zenodo.23554948
UR  - https://zenodo.org/records/23554948
AB  - SAE Relation Theory Paper 7. This record holds the Chinese text and its English edition. The English edition is an independent rewrite of the Chinese text, not a translation; where the two differ, the Chinese governs. Each text comes with a quotation audit table.  So long as a relation is not exited, conflict cannot be guaranteed not to occur; cultivation and colonization are entangled in dealings (Paper 5, H44). Yet it is precisely because of this that a subject needs relation, cannot-not seek relation and is in relation. This paper argues how far that sentence can stand in propositions.  The danger of relation and the necessity of relation come from the same place: the other party's law is not mine, and is not under my control. Because it is not under my control, it can occupy my position of revision; and because it is not under my control, it is an avenue of questioning I cannot monopolize; and the relational layer, where such a law is met, is for that reason the only setting in which pure cultivation can possibly occur. Collision itself, conflict included, can be an avenue of chiseling; its cost is written together with it.  Seeking relation is the cannot-not of looking toward the other. This sentence is written as a conditional: wherever the remainder "the other too is an end" is at work in a subject, looking toward the other is its cannot-not. Need is not lack, and someone who finds no one is not thereby short of anything; nor is need a duty, and it does not mean that relation is always beneficial. Questioning from outside cannot be replaced by looking back on oneself; yet openness at the topological layer is not the same as keeping contact with any one particular person permanently. Exiting a relation can avoid some of its dangers, and one then also no longer has the possibilities that come only if these dealings continue; what is exited is a relation, not relation itself.  SAE 关系论 Paper 7。本记录收中文正文与英文版;英文版是独立重写,不是翻译,两版不一致处以中文为准。两版各附引文审计表。  关系只要不退出,冲突就不能保证不发生;涵育与殖民在来往里纠缠在一起(沉积篇 H44)。可也正是因为如此,主体才需要关系,不得不去寻找关系,处在关系当中。这一篇论证这一句在命题里能立到哪里。  关系的危险与关系的必要出自同一处:对方那一条法不是我的,也不由我控制。因为不由我控制,它可能占我的修订位;也因为不由我控制,它才是一条我独占不了的追问来路;与这样一条法相遇的关系层,也才是纯粹涵育唯一可能发生的场合。碰撞本身,冲突也在内,可能是凿的来路;代价一起写。  寻找关系,就是看向他者的那个不得不。这一句写成条件式:凡「他者亦是目的」这道余项在一个主体身上运作,看向他者就是它的不得不。需要不是缺,找不到的人不因此少什么;需要也不是义务,不等于关系总有益。外部的追问不能由自我回看替代,可是拓扑层的开放,不等于对某一个具体的人永久保持接触。退出一段关系可以躲开它的某些危险,也不再有要靠这段来往继续才有的那些可能;退出的是一段关系,不是关系本身。  Related works  Relation: Cites · Resource type: Publication / Preprint · Scheme: DOI  10.5281/zenodo.23541778  10.5281/zenodo.23545024  10.5281/zenodo.23545047  10.5281/zenodo.23545057  10.5281/zenodo.23545076  10.5281/zenodo.23545087  10.5281/zenodo.21405207  10.5281/zenodo.21611154  10.5281/zenodo.20011018  10.5281/zenodo.22313628  10.5281/zenodo.19297847  10.5281/zenodo.19328662  10.5281/zenodo.22652134  10.5281/zenodo.22731235  10.5281/zenodo.22970783  10.5281/zenodo.21285136  10.5281/zenodo.23271072
ER  -