Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,952 studies31 sourcesUpdated 33 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0Zenodo

SAE Relation Theory Paper 5: The Sediment of Dealings / SAE 关系论 Paper 5: 来往的沉积

Abstract

SAE Relation Theory Paper 5. This record holds the Chinese text and its English edition. The English edition is an independent rewrite of the Chinese text, not a translation; where the two differ, the Chinese governs. Each text comes with a quotation audit table.

This paper reads what dealings sediment into over time: how one effect changes the conditions for what can next be said, heard and revised, and how it is in turn changed by what the other side does afterwards; and how the sediments on the two sides meet.

The reading of sediment is given in positions: which are open and which are sealed, written by content-domain and period; the relation as a whole is given no overall direction. Cultivation and colonization are entangled in the same stretch of dealings: the two directions coexist, and one and the same act can carry both; as dealings pile up time after time, direction can turn: care can grow into clinging, and discipline can also grow into something that lifts a person up. That the two are hard to tell apart does not mean they need not be told apart: the grounds for judging direction lie at the time, and where material is insufficient the reading stops at undetermined. The completion of cultivation at the value layer is not in the enactor's hands; incomplete cultivation at the value layer is not colonization at the value layer; for the two directions in the broad sense, too, whether they took hold rests on the other party's later understanding and action.

The direction of colonization can proceed without passing through conflict: whether the path to saying no is made hard to travel or is locked, conflict can fail to appear either way, so a long absence of conflict in a relation is not evidence of cultivation. Dependency has two senses: people depend on one another in any case; the kind that was made, and that has locked the path to saying no, carries the direction of colonization. After conflict has occurred again and again, stopping points can have become routine, and stalling can have become the normal state. The cells of stability sediment in time, and one cell can become another. The relational layer is one of the channels through which institutions co-opt individuals; this paper reads only the relational side of it.

This paper's main material lies within the limit: influence, teaching and persuasion that stay within the limit can carry the direction of colonization without being violation, and it is here that entanglement is hardest to sort out. However deep the reading goes, it is not written up as "That's just who he is": long-run relational fact can shift the weight of a judgment; it cannot complete a certification.

SAE 关系论 Paper 5。本记录收中文正文与英文版;英文版是独立重写,不是翻译,两版不一致处以中文为准。两版各附引文审计表。

这一篇读来往在时间里沉积成什么。一次作用怎样改变下一次能说、能听、能修订的条件,又怎样被另一端此后的行动反过来改变;两边的沉积怎样碰在一起。

沉积的读数用位置说:哪几位开着,哪几位封着,按内容域与时段写,不给整段关系一个总的方向。涵育与殖民在同一段来往里纠缠:两向并存,同一个动作可以两向都有;来往一次次叠起来,方向可以转,照料可以长成依附,管束也可以长成托举。分不太清,不等于不必分:判方向的根据在当时,材料不足停在未定。价值层的涵育的完成不在施为者手里;未完成的价值层的涵育不是价值层的殖民;宽义的两个方向,成没成也都看对方此后的理解与行动。

殖民这个方向可以不经过冲突:说不的路被弄得难走或被锁住,冲突都可以不出现,所以一段关系长期无冲突,不作涵育的证据。依赖分两义:人本来就互相依赖;被造出来,又锁住了说不之路的那一种,带殖民这个方向。冲突一再发生之后,止点可以成了常事,拖着可以成了常态。稳定的各格在时间里沉积,一格可以变成另一格。关系层是制度征用个体的通道之一,这一篇只读关系这一端。

这一篇的主材料在限之内:停在限之内的影响、教导与劝说,可以带殖民这个方向而不是侵,纠缠在这里最难分。读得再深,也不写成「他就是这样的人」:长期的关系事实可以改变判断的权重,不能完成认证。

Related works

Relation: Cites · Resource type: Publication / Preprint · Scheme: DOI

10.5281/zenodo.23541778

10.5281/zenodo.23545024

10.5281/zenodo.23545047

10.5281/zenodo.23545057

10.5281/zenodo.19297847

10.5281/zenodo.22313628

10.5281/zenodo.22974154

10.5281/zenodo.22970769

10.5281/zenodo.22970777

10.5281/zenodo.22731235

10.5281/zenodo.21611154

10.5281/zenodo.21212595

10.5281/zenodo.19381666

10.5281/zenodo.23270766

10.5281/zenodo.23271072

Related

  1. SAE Relation Theory Paper 4: Dealings and Expectation / SAE 关系论 Paper 4: 来往与期待
    Han Qin
    ZenodoPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textZenodo
  2. SAE Relation Theory Paper 7: Why Still Relate / SAE 关系论 Paper 7: 为什么仍要关系
    Han Qin
    ZenodoPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textZenodo
  3. SAE Relation Theory Paper 6: Asymmetry, Divergence and Ending / SAE 关系论 Paper 6: 不对称、分歧与结束
    Han Qin
    ZenodoPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textZenodo
  4. SAE Relation Theory Paper 1: What a Relation Is, and What It Is Not / SAE 关系论 Paper 1: 关系是什么,不是什么
    Han Qin
    ZenodoPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textZenodo
  5. SAE Relation Theory Paper 2: Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow / SAE 关系论 Paper 2: 昨天、今天、明天
    Han Qin
    ZenodoPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textZenodo
BibTeX
@misc{qin2026relation,
  title = {{SAE Relation Theory Paper 5: The Sediment of Dealings / SAE 关系论 Paper 5: 来往的沉积}},
  author = {Han Qin},
  howpublished = {Zenodo},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.5281/zenodo.23554938},
  url = {https://zenodo.org/records/23554938},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - SAE Relation Theory Paper 5: The Sediment of Dealings / SAE 关系论 Paper 5: 来往的沉积
AU  - Han Qin
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/22
PB  - Zenodo
DO  - 10.5281/zenodo.23554938
UR  - https://zenodo.org/records/23554938
AB  - SAE Relation Theory Paper 5. This record holds the Chinese text and its English edition. The English edition is an independent rewrite of the Chinese text, not a translation; where the two differ, the Chinese governs. Each text comes with a quotation audit table.  This paper reads what dealings sediment into over time: how one effect changes the conditions for what can next be said, heard and revised, and how it is in turn changed by what the other side does afterwards; and how the sediments on the two sides meet.  The reading of sediment is given in positions: which are open and which are sealed, written by content-domain and period; the relation as a whole is given no overall direction. Cultivation and colonization are entangled in the same stretch of dealings: the two directions coexist, and one and the same act can carry both; as dealings pile up time after time, direction can turn: care can grow into clinging, and discipline can also grow into something that lifts a person up. That the two are hard to tell apart does not mean they need not be told apart: the grounds for judging direction lie at the time, and where material is insufficient the reading stops at undetermined. The completion of cultivation at the value layer is not in the enactor's hands; incomplete cultivation at the value layer is not colonization at the value layer; for the two directions in the broad sense, too, whether they took hold rests on the other party's later understanding and action.  The direction of colonization can proceed without passing through conflict: whether the path to saying no is made hard to travel or is locked, conflict can fail to appear either way, so a long absence of conflict in a relation is not evidence of cultivation. Dependency has two senses: people depend on one another in any case; the kind that was made, and that has locked the path to saying no, carries the direction of colonization. After conflict has occurred again and again, stopping points can have become routine, and stalling can have become the normal state. The cells of stability sediment in time, and one cell can become another. The relational layer is one of the channels through which institutions co-opt individuals; this paper reads only the relational side of it.  This paper's main material lies within the limit: influence, teaching and persuasion that stay within the limit can carry the direction of colonization without being violation, and it is here that entanglement is hardest to sort out. However deep the reading goes, it is not written up as "That's just who he is": long-run relational fact can shift the weight of a judgment; it cannot complete a certification.  SAE 关系论 Paper 5。本记录收中文正文与英文版;英文版是独立重写,不是翻译,两版不一致处以中文为准。两版各附引文审计表。  这一篇读来往在时间里沉积成什么。一次作用怎样改变下一次能说、能听、能修订的条件,又怎样被另一端此后的行动反过来改变;两边的沉积怎样碰在一起。  沉积的读数用位置说:哪几位开着,哪几位封着,按内容域与时段写,不给整段关系一个总的方向。涵育与殖民在同一段来往里纠缠:两向并存,同一个动作可以两向都有;来往一次次叠起来,方向可以转,照料可以长成依附,管束也可以长成托举。分不太清,不等于不必分:判方向的根据在当时,材料不足停在未定。价值层的涵育的完成不在施为者手里;未完成的价值层的涵育不是价值层的殖民;宽义的两个方向,成没成也都看对方此后的理解与行动。  殖民这个方向可以不经过冲突:说不的路被弄得难走或被锁住,冲突都可以不出现,所以一段关系长期无冲突,不作涵育的证据。依赖分两义:人本来就互相依赖;被造出来,又锁住了说不之路的那一种,带殖民这个方向。冲突一再发生之后,止点可以成了常事,拖着可以成了常态。稳定的各格在时间里沉积,一格可以变成另一格。关系层是制度征用个体的通道之一,这一篇只读关系这一端。  这一篇的主材料在限之内:停在限之内的影响、教导与劝说,可以带殖民这个方向而不是侵,纠缠在这里最难分。读得再深,也不写成「他就是这样的人」:长期的关系事实可以改变判断的权重,不能完成认证。  Related works  Relation: Cites · Resource type: Publication / Preprint · Scheme: DOI  10.5281/zenodo.23541778  10.5281/zenodo.23545024  10.5281/zenodo.23545047  10.5281/zenodo.23545057  10.5281/zenodo.19297847  10.5281/zenodo.22313628  10.5281/zenodo.22974154  10.5281/zenodo.22970769  10.5281/zenodo.22970777  10.5281/zenodo.22731235  10.5281/zenodo.21611154  10.5281/zenodo.21212595  10.5281/zenodo.19381666  10.5281/zenodo.23270766  10.5281/zenodo.23271072
ER  -