Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,948 studies31 sourcesUpdated 31 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Journal of Electrical Bioimpedance

Monte Carlo study of noise-induced phase angle errors in low-frequency tetrapolar bioimpedance measurements

  1. 1Department of Physics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
  2. 2Department of Clinical and Biomedical Engineering, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway

Abstract

Phase angles measured at low frequencies with the tetrapolar technique are sometimes scattered or even positive. We used Monte Carlo simulations of lock-in detection to quantify how large phase errors that measurement noise alone can cause. For a signal-to-noise ratio after demodulation (SNRout) of about 3 or higher, the standard deviation of the phase error was close to 57° divided by SNRout, and 95% of the errors were within about twice this value. At SNRout = 10 the error standard deviation was 6°; at SNRout = 1 it was 64° and 16% of the measurements were wrong by more than 90°. As SNRout decreased towards zero, the phase gradually approached a completely random value. In an illustrative low-frequency tetrapolar measurement, the absolute phase errors were small (standard deviation 0.007° at 1 Hz and 0.04° at 0.1 Hz), but the true tissue phase was even smaller. The error was therefore 1.2 times the true phase at 1 Hz and 37 times at 0.1 Hz, and the measured phase had the wrong sign in 20% and 49% of the measurements, respectively. The sign of a small phase angle is only reliable (wrong in less than 1% of measurements) when the true phase is larger than 2.3 times the error standard deviation.

Related

  1. Short-Term Changes in Segmental Multi-Frequency Bioelectrical Impedance Measurements Following Water and Banana Intake: A Fixed-Order Within-Subject Study.
    Erika Čermáková, Monika Kunzová, Jana Olejníčková +2
    International journal of medical sciencesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textPhysiologyEurope PMC
  2. Stable isotope‐derived measurements of protein synthesis detect amino acid‐induced anabolism in skeletal muscle microtissues not captured by puromycin labelling
    Yekaterina Tiper, Cassidy T. Tinline‐Goodfellow, Penney M. Gilbert +1
    Experimental physiologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Physiological discordance between clinical examination, bioimpedance spectroscopy, and lung ultrasound in maintenance hemodialysis patients without heart failure
    Irwing R. Benites-Flores, Javier Rodríguez Revilla, Alvaro Taype-Rondan +8
    Frontiers in nephrologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Electromagnetic validation of a multichannel coplanar four-electrode bioimpedance sensing platform for perfused 3D tumor-on-chip systems
    Royer Félix, Meynard Thomas, Houssier Robin +4
    Journal of Electrical BioimpedancePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineDOAJ
  5. High-frequency ultrasound point-of-care device to quantify myopia-induced microstructural changes in the anterior sclera
    Cameron Hoerig, Quan V. Hoang, Johannes Aichele +2
    Ophthalmic and Physiological OpticsPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text3 citedSystems & synthetic biologyMedical imaging & radiologyHAL
BibTeX
@article{hou2026monte,
  title = {{Monte Carlo study of noise-induced phase angle errors in low-frequency tetrapolar bioimpedance measurements}},
  author = {Jie Hou and Sisay Mebre Abie and Ørjan G. Martinsen},
  journal = {Journal of Electrical Bioimpedance},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.2478/joeb-2026-0017},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.2478/joeb-2026-0017},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Monte Carlo study of noise-induced phase angle errors in low-frequency tetrapolar bioimpedance measurements
AU  - Jie Hou
AU  - Sisay Mebre Abie
AU  - Ørjan G. Martinsen
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/01
JO  - Journal of Electrical Bioimpedance
DO  - 10.2478/joeb-2026-0017
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2478/joeb-2026-0017
AB  - Phase angles measured at low frequencies with the tetrapolar technique are sometimes scattered or even positive. We used Monte Carlo simulations of lock-in detection to quantify how large phase errors that measurement noise alone can cause. For a signal-to-noise ratio after demodulation (SNRout) of about 3 or higher, the standard deviation of the phase error was close to 57° divided by SNRout, and 95% of the errors were within about twice this value. At SNRout = 10 the error standard deviation was 6°; at SNRout = 1 it was 64° and 16% of the measurements were wrong by more than 90°. As SNRout decreased towards zero, the phase gradually approached a completely random value. In an illustrative low-frequency tetrapolar measurement, the absolute phase errors were small (standard deviation 0.007° at 1 Hz and 0.04° at 0.1 Hz), but the true tissue phase was even smaller. The error was therefore 1.2 times the true phase at 1 Hz and 37 times at 0.1 Hz, and the measured phase had the wrong sign in 20% and 49% of the measurements, respectively. The sign of a small phase angle is only reliable (wrong in less than 1% of measurements) when the true phase is larger than 2.3 times the error standard deviation.
SN  - 1891-5469
ER  -