Public views and acceptability of policies designed to achieve a healthy weight across the United Kingdom: qualitative analysis of the role of government mistrust and legitimacy of policy actors
Abstract
Background: Rates of overweight and obesity for children, young people and adults remain high in the UK and globally. Research demonstrates that policies continue to drift downstream and focus largely on individual behaviours. In response, the Obesity Health Alliance (OHA) in the UK published– Turning the Tide: A 10 Year Healthy Weight Strategy – a long-term agenda of evidence-informed policies with 30 recommendations. A key aspect to the successful implementation of policies is public acceptability. The study aimed to explore public views of obesity policy recommendations in the OHA’s Healthy Weight Strategy, and broader views on the policy process surrounding the implementation of these recommendations.
Methods: Participants engaged in a qualitative two-stage interview approach was designed for the study, with 26 participants recruited across England, Scotland and Wales. Participants were recruited to the study using a commissioned, established, GDPR compliant market research agency based in England. Interviews were conducted between October 2021 and January 2022. Data were analysed thematically using NVivo.
Results: Findings demonstrate a broad acceptance of the policy recommendations, with a desire for those that support individual autonomy. Children were viewed as a key population, as well as a powerful framing device through which to improve policy support. Despite policy support, participants expressed a lack of trust in the government’s will or ability to implement the policies, something that a range of studies relating to other policy areas have found in the UK context. There was also a tension surrounding who is or is not a legitimate policy actor, with strong support for government and public involvement, and a rejection of industry participation in policy making.
Conclusions: These findings add to the growing literature on public acceptability of policies relevant to overweight and obesity. In this study, the acceptability of such policies appeared to be underpinned by whether or not participants trusted those holding power to implement the policies effectively and act in the best interests of the public. There is a need to continue to engage the public in wider policy debates regarding population health and policy options available to improve it.
Related
- Digital Twins in Mental Health Care: A Qualitative Study on Subjective Relevance, Acceptability and Implementation Considerations Co-Designed, Co-Produced and Co-Written with Experts by Experience and Academics
- Age differences in motivations, barriers, and facilitators of wearable and mobile app use in a government-led digital health initiative: a qualitative study
- Ensuring quality in research, 'Authorship Effect' & Conflict of Interest. Response submitted to BMJ Mental Health in response to 'Clinician perspectives on the utility and acceptability of OxSATS: a qualitative study of a novel structured suicide risk assessment tool
- Stakeholder perspectives on the effects of global health initiatives on the quality of maternal health services in government health facilities in the Elgon Region, Uganda: a qualitative descriptive study
- Enjoy Life LocallY (ELLY): A qualitative study of a co-designed healthy weight and wellbeing intervention in two disadvantaged Scottish communities
BibTeX
@article{carterswhite2026public,
title = {{Public views and acceptability of policies designed to achieve a healthy weight across the United Kingdom: qualitative analysis of the role of government mistrust and legitimacy of policy actors}},
author = {Lauren Carters-White and Olivia Brown and Imogen Bevan and Caroline Cerny and Keith Syrett and Linda Bauld},
journal = {BMC Public Health},
year = {2026},
month = nov,
doi = {10.1186/s12889-026-28407-9},
url = {https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-026-28407-9},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Public views and acceptability of policies designed to achieve a healthy weight across the United Kingdom: qualitative analysis of the role of government mistrust and legitimacy of policy actors
AU - Lauren Carters-White
AU - Olivia Brown
AU - Imogen Bevan
AU - Caroline Cerny
AU - Keith Syrett
AU - Linda Bauld
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/11/03
JO - BMC Public Health
DO - 10.1186/s12889-026-28407-9
UR - https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-026-28407-9
AB - Background: Rates of overweight and obesity for children, young people and adults remain high in the UK and globally. Research demonstrates that policies continue to drift downstream and focus largely on individual behaviours. In response, the Obesity Health Alliance (OHA) in the UK published– Turning the Tide: A 10 Year Healthy Weight Strategy – a long-term agenda of evidence-informed policies with 30 recommendations. A key aspect to the successful implementation of policies is public acceptability. The study aimed to explore public views of obesity policy recommendations in the OHA’s Healthy Weight Strategy, and broader views on the policy process surrounding the implementation of these recommendations. Methods: Participants engaged in a qualitative two-stage interview approach was designed for the study, with 26 participants recruited across England, Scotland and Wales. Participants were recruited to the study using a commissioned, established, GDPR compliant market research agency based in England. Interviews were conducted between October 2021 and January 2022. Data were analysed thematically using NVivo. Results: Findings demonstrate a broad acceptance of the policy recommendations, with a desire for those that support individual autonomy. Children were viewed as a key population, as well as a powerful framing device through which to improve policy support. Despite policy support, participants expressed a lack of trust in the government’s will or ability to implement the policies, something that a range of studies relating to other policy areas have found in the UK context. There was also a tension surrounding who is or is not a legitimate policy actor, with strong support for government and public involvement, and a rejection of industry participation in policy making. Conclusions: These findings add to the growing literature on public acceptability of policies relevant to overweight and obesity. In this study, the acceptability of such policies appeared to be underpinned by whether or not participants trusted those holding power to implement the policies effectively and act in the best interests of the public. There is a need to continue to engage the public in wider policy debates regarding population health and policy options available to improve it.
SN - 1471-2458
ER -