Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 35 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0PLOS One

Factors affecting family consent to corneal donation at a hospital-based eye bank in a tertiary Israeli medical center

  1. 1Department of Ophthalmology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
  2. 2Department of Military Medicine and "Tzameret", Faculty of Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem and Israel Defense Forces Medical Corps, Jerusalem, Israel
  3. 3Israel National Transplant Center, Israel Ministry of Health, Tel Aviv, Israel

Abstract

Purpose: To identify clinical, demographic, and situational factors associated with family consent to corneal donation in a culturally diverse Israeli medical center operating under an opt-in system. Methods: This retrospective observational study included 824 deceased individuals eligible for corneal donation at Hadassah Medical Center between 2019 and 2022. Data were collected on various variables, such as religion, Jewish religiosity, donor card registration, hospitalization details, method of family approach (face-to-face or telephone), next of kin identity and relation to consent for corneal donation. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify factors associated with family consent to corneal donation. Results: Overall, 30.7% of families consented to corneal donation. In multivariable analyses, older age, religion, Jewish religiosity, donor card registration of the deceased, and donor card registration of a first-degree family member were independently associated with family consent. Jewish families were more likely to consent than non-Jewish families (OR=7.79), and within the Jewish population, secular and modern Orthodox families had the highest consent rates (57.3% and 53.6%, respectively). Donor card registration showed the strongest association with consent, with the highest consent rate observed when both the deceased and a first-degree family member were registered (83.3%, OR = 29.80). Consent rates did not differ significantly between telephone and face-to-face approaches. Conclusions: Religion, Jewish religiosity, and donor card registration were independently associated with family consent to corneal donation. Comparable consent rates following telephone and face-to-face approaches suggest that telephone based requests may be an effective alternative when in-person discussions are not feasible. These findings support efforts to increase awareness of corneal donation, promote donor card registration, and tailor communication strategies to different cultural and religious communities.

Related

  1. Factors Affecting Delay in Presentation and Management of Pediatric Cataract: A Cross-sectional Study at a Tertiary Philippine Hospital.
    Mayleen D Jereza, Alvina Pauline D Santiago
    Acta medica PhilippinaPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMCPMC
  2. Consent in the dark: Can living kidney donation proceed amid marital infidelity?
    Crystal Lim, Teck Chuan Voo, Peter Chiu-Leung Chow +1
    Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ TransplantationPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMC
  3. Clinical profile, risk factors and in-hospital outcomes of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in young versus older adults: a 5-year retrospective cohort study at a tertiary care centre in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
    Faisal Alhusain, Fatimah Alsumari, Renad Almasari +5
    BMJ openPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textCardiovascular medicineEurope PMCCrossref
  4. Out-Of-Pocket Expenditure and its Associated Factors among Antenatal and Postnatal Women Attending a Tertiary Care Hospital in Chhattisgarh, India: A Cross-Sectional Study
    Preethi Virapouttirane, Yogachithan Vijayakumar, Paul Vinoth
    Journal of Public and Clinical Health ResearchPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-SAFull textGeneral medicineDOAJ
  5. Incidence and factors associated with infections in kidney transplant recipients at the tertiary hospital, Thailand.
    S. Phacharoen, A. Prawang, S. Kanchanasurakit +5
    medRxivPreprintCC BYFull textInfectious diseasemedRxiv
BibTeX
@article{amir2026factors,
  title = {{Factors affecting family consent to corneal donation at a hospital-based eye bank in a tertiary Israeli medical center}},
  author = {Eden Amir and Netanel Corem and Dean David Lichter and Tamar Ashkenazi and Abraham Solomon},
  journal = {PLOS One},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0357908},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0357908},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Factors affecting family consent to corneal donation at a hospital-based eye bank in a tertiary Israeli medical center
AU  - Eden Amir
AU  - Netanel Corem
AU  - Dean David Lichter
AU  - Tamar Ashkenazi
AU  - Abraham Solomon
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/17
JO  - PLOS One
DO  - 10.1371/journal.pone.0357908
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0357908
AB  - Purpose: To identify clinical, demographic, and situational factors associated with family consent to corneal donation in a culturally diverse Israeli medical center operating under an opt-in system. Methods: This retrospective observational study included 824 deceased individuals eligible for corneal donation at Hadassah Medical Center between 2019 and 2022. Data were collected on various variables, such as religion, Jewish religiosity, donor card registration, hospitalization details, method of family approach (face-to-face or telephone), next of kin identity and relation to consent for corneal donation. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify factors associated with family consent to corneal donation. Results: Overall, 30.7% of families consented to corneal donation. In multivariable analyses, older age, religion, Jewish religiosity, donor card registration of the deceased, and donor card registration of a first-degree family member were independently associated with family consent. Jewish families were more likely to consent than non-Jewish families (OR=7.79), and within the Jewish population, secular and modern Orthodox families had the highest consent rates (57.3% and 53.6%, respectively). Donor card registration showed the strongest association with consent, with the highest consent rate observed when both the deceased and a first-degree family member were registered (83.3%, OR = 29.80). Consent rates did not differ significantly between telephone and face-to-face approaches. Conclusions: Religion, Jewish religiosity, and donor card registration were independently associated with family consent to corneal donation. Comparable consent rates following telephone and face-to-face approaches suggest that telephone based requests may be an effective alternative when in-person discussions are not feasible. These findings support efforts to increase awareness of corneal donation, promote donor card registration, and tailor communication strategies to different cultural and religious communities.
SN  - 1932-6203
ER  -