Plastic waste and price when using intermittent catheterization compared to indwelling catheter in peri- and immediate postoperative patients with hip fractures.
- 1Department of Geriatrics, Holbaek Sygehus, Holbaek, DK-4300, Denmark. [email protected].
- 2University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. [email protected].
Abstract
Purpose
Patients with a hip fracture have an indwelling catheter (IUC) before, during, and shortly after the operation. Recent publications have shown that IUC does not result in more cystitis (UTI) than SIC (sterile intermittent catheterization) when only used for a short period. An issue that has hitherto not been taken into consideration is the volume of plastic waste and the associated costs generated by either method. Indeed, nursing staff have expressed concerns regarding this issue, perceiving that SIC generates more plastic waste than IUC. Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine the weight of plastic in grams, and the associated costs generated by using IUC versus SIC.Methods
Equipment for inserting an IUC and leaving it in situ for three days, and equipment for the use of SIC for three days was chosen. Non plastic items were removed, and each plastic item was weighed separately. The prices of the equipment in the hospital's price list were used for the price calculations. The amount of plastic and the price for using IUC or SIC for one and three days were calculated.Results
SIC for 1 day results in 2.2 times more plastic waste than IUC. SIC for three days results in 5.8 times more plastic waste than IUC. SIC for 1 day is 4.2 times more expensive than IUC. SIC for 3 days is 12 times more expensive than IUC.Conclusion
These results confirm the concerns expressed by the nursing staff, demonstrating that the use of SIC (sterile intermittent catheterization) results in substantially more plastic waste than IUC (indwelling catheter), while also being considerably more costly.
Related
- Patient-Centered Transition to Clean Intermittent Catheterization After a Sacrectomy for Sacral Chordoma: A Case Report and Narrative Review
- Variation in urobiome composition over time in asymptomatic individuals with spinal cord injury and disease using intermittent catheterization
- Association of weekend admission on immediate postoperative outcomes following non-elective cardiac operations
- Impact of Hepatic Artery Diameter on Immediate Postoperative Graft Function and Hemodynamic Profiles in Living-Donor Liver Transplantation: A Retrospective Cohort Study
- Immediate gastrocnemius responses to intermittent cold compression at different pressure levels in soccer players
BibTeX
@article{midttun2026plastic,
title = {{Plastic waste and price when using intermittent catheterization compared to indwelling catheter in peri- and immediate postoperative patients with hip fractures.}},
author = {Mette Midttun},
journal = {BMC urology},
year = {2026},
month = jul,
doi = {10.1186/s12894-026-02263-6},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42958263},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Plastic waste and price when using intermittent catheterization compared to indwelling catheter in peri- and immediate postoperative patients with hip fractures.
AU - Mette Midttun
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/07/28
JO - BMC urology
DO - 10.1186/s12894-026-02263-6
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42958263
AB - Purpose Patients with a hip fracture have an indwelling catheter (IUC) before, during, and shortly after the operation. Recent publications have shown that IUC does not result in more cystitis (UTI) than SIC (sterile intermittent catheterization) when only used for a short period. An issue that has hitherto not been taken into consideration is the volume of plastic waste and the associated costs generated by either method. Indeed, nursing staff have expressed concerns regarding this issue, perceiving that SIC generates more plastic waste than IUC. Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine the weight of plastic in grams, and the associated costs generated by using IUC versus SIC.Methods Equipment for inserting an IUC and leaving it in situ for three days, and equipment for the use of SIC for three days was chosen. Non plastic items were removed, and each plastic item was weighed separately. The prices of the equipment in the hospital's price list were used for the price calculations. The amount of plastic and the price for using IUC or SIC for one and three days were calculated.Results SIC for 1 day results in 2.2 times more plastic waste than IUC. SIC for three days results in 5.8 times more plastic waste than IUC. SIC for 1 day is 4.2 times more expensive than IUC. SIC for 3 days is 12 times more expensive than IUC.Conclusion These results confirm the concerns expressed by the nursing staff, demonstrating that the use of SIC (sterile intermittent catheterization) results in substantially more plastic waste than IUC (indwelling catheter), while also being considerably more costly.
SN - 1471-2490
ER -