Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 31 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Environmental Research Letters

Can Class 3 e-bikes help meet California’s VMT and climate goals? A mobility-substitution screening

  1. 1Université Grenoble Alpes ILCEA4/SoCLE
  2. 2Université Grenoble Alpes

Abstract

Transportation is California’s largest source of greenhouse gas emissions, and vehicle electrification alone does not reduce vehicle-miles traveled (VMT). This paper asks whether Class 3 e-bikes—pedal-assisted to 28 mph—could replace some of the intermediate-distance commutes that conventional bicycles rarely serve. Using 2024 LOCUS mobility data for Los Angeles County, we define an addressable commute band as weekday peak-period Motorized travel of 5–15 miles one way. This market contains 11.98 million passenger-miles per weekday, while conventional bicycles account for only about 0.3% of passenger-miles under the same filters. European speed-pedelec evidence shows that these distances are within routine operating range. Because LOCUS includes e-bikes within Motorized travel, the scenarios explicitly vary both the automobile share of that category and the share of Class 3 travel that actually replaces car travel. In the upper-bound full-substitution case, a 10% shift removes 283 million vehicle-miles and 101.6 ktCO2e per year. That is 5.6 times LA Metro’s published bikeway VMT benefit, mainly because the trips considered here are longer. Yet the same scenario removes only about 0.43% of modeled county passenger VMT, and the 30% stress test about 1.3%. Class 3 e-bikes are therefore a potentially important intermediate-distance option, but only one part of the much larger mobility transition required in California.

Related

  1. Net primary productivity in the Gulf of California: spatio-temporal patterns and drivers in a warming climate (2003–2024)
    Eduardo González-Rodríguez, Rafael Cervantes-Duarte, Juan David Acevedo-Acosta +1
    Ocean SciencePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textOceanography & cryosphereCrossrefDOAJ
  2. Beyond climate migration: the right to remain and the right to development as complementary frameworks for climate mobility governance in Africa
    Michael Addaney
    Frontiers in ClimatePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEnvironmental science & pollutionDOAJ
  3. Fixed-ground multisensor monitoring resolves longitudinal vegetation condition and fuel-state structure in Southern California chaparral and oak scenes
    Andrew Lee
    EarthArXivPreprintPublisher termsFull textEcologyEvolutionary biologyEarthArXiv
  4. Similar evapotranspiration responses mask contrasting modes of water access during drought in California
    Yan Zhang, Veronica J. Berrocal, Joshua B. Fisher +3
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAtmospheric science & meteorologyarXiv
  5. Why nature cannot be replaced: the limits of substitution in biodiversity conservation
    Dominique Ghijselinck
    EcoEvoRxivPreprintPublisher termsFull textEnvironmental science & pollutionEcoEvoRxiv
BibTeX
@article{tounsi2026class,
  title = {{Can Class 3 e-bikes help meet California’s VMT and climate goals? A mobility-substitution screening}},
  author = {Christophe Roncato Tounsi and Ryan Powers},
  journal = {Environmental Research Letters},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1088/1748-9326/aeaf6a},
  url = {https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/aeaf6a},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Can Class 3 e-bikes help meet California’s VMT and climate goals? A mobility-substitution screening
AU  - Christophe Roncato Tounsi
AU  - Ryan Powers
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/13
JO  - Environmental Research Letters
DO  - 10.1088/1748-9326/aeaf6a
UR  - https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/aeaf6a
AB  - Transportation is California’s largest source of greenhouse gas emissions, and vehicle electrification alone does not reduce vehicle-miles traveled (VMT). This paper asks whether Class 3 e-bikes—pedal-assisted to 28 mph—could replace some of the intermediate-distance commutes that conventional bicycles rarely serve. Using 2024 LOCUS mobility data for Los Angeles County, we define an addressable commute band as weekday peak-period Motorized travel of 5–15 miles one way. This market contains 11.98 million passenger-miles per weekday, while conventional bicycles account for only about 0.3% of passenger-miles under the same filters. European speed-pedelec evidence shows that these distances are within routine operating range. Because LOCUS includes e-bikes within Motorized travel, the scenarios explicitly vary both the automobile share of that category and the share of Class 3 travel that actually replaces car travel. In the upper-bound full-substitution case, a 10% shift removes 283 million vehicle-miles and 101.6 ktCO2e per year. That is 5.6 times LA Metro’s published bikeway VMT benefit, mainly because the trips considered here are longer. Yet the same scenario removes only about 0.43% of modeled county passenger VMT, and the 30% stress test about 1.3%. Class 3 e-bikes are therefore a potentially important intermediate-distance option, but only one part of the much larger mobility transition required in California.
SN  - 1748-9326
ER  -