Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
186,631 studies31 sourcesUpdated 53 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYExperimental physiology

Creatine and cognitive function: Why has physiological plausibility not translated into convincing clinical evidence?

  1. 1Fundação Universitária de Itaperuna, Itaperuna, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Abstract

Creatine is among the most extensively studied and widely used nutritional supplements in sports and exercise science. Over the past two decades, however, interest has expanded well beyond skeletal muscle, driven by growing recognition of the central role played by the creatine-phosphocreatine system in cerebral bioenergetics. Experimental evidence indicates that creatine contributes to neuronal energy homeostasis, mitochondrial function, membrane stability and potentially neuroprotection. This has fuelled growing enthusiasm for the idea that creatine supplementation might enhance cognitive function and benefit individuals with compromised cerebral metabolism. Yet, despite strong physiological plausibility, clinical findings remain inconsistent and often difficult to interpret. In this review, it is argued that the gap between proposed mechanisms and available clinical evidence reflects two distinct challenges: biological constraints on cerebral creatine availability after supplementation, and persistent methodological weaknesses in the clinical literature. We contend that the central challenge for the coming decade is not to identify new mechanisms of creatine action in the brain, but to establish, unequivocally, whether measurable changes in cerebral bioenergetics translate into meaningful cognitive benefit - whether as enhanced performance in healthy individuals or as clinically significant improvement in patient populations.

Related

  1. Saccadic Neural Command Estimation via Forward Dynamics Control: Influence of Extraocular Muscle Geometry on Physiological Plausibility
    Even Harsigny, Pablo Alvarez Corrales, Michel Duprez +1
    Multidisciplinary Biomechanics JournalPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeuroscienceHAL
  2. Concurrent cognitive, behavioral and systemic physiological features mark preclinical Alzheimer's disease
    L. Tsoran, Y. Rom, A. Taha +8
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textNeurosciencebioRxiv
  3. BioTrajX: evaluating biological plausibility in single-cell trajectory inference
    T. Y. Li, Y.-M. Chang, S.-Y. Chen
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textBioinformatics & computational biologybioRxiv
  4. Translational plausibility of honey-derived antimicrobial biomaterials against biofilm-associated infections
    António Machado, Juraj Majtan, José M. Álvarez-Suárez
    Frontiers in MicrobiologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textZoology & animal behaviourCrossrefDOAJ
  5. Creatine Supplementation in Crohn's Disease: Possible Therapeutic Trends in Symptoms and Muscle Tissue Integrity.
    Konstantinos Papadimitriou, Richard B Kreider, Georgia-Eirini Deligiannidou +2
    Muscles (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textCell biologyEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{machado2026creatine,
  title = {{Creatine and cognitive function: Why has physiological plausibility not translated into convincing clinical evidence?}},
  author = {Marco Machado},
  journal = {Experimental physiology},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1113/ep094109},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42912797},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Creatine and cognitive function: Why has physiological plausibility not translated into convincing clinical evidence?
AU  - Marco Machado
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/23
JO  - Experimental physiology
DO  - 10.1113/ep094109
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42912797
AB  - Creatine is among the most extensively studied and widely used nutritional supplements in sports and exercise science. Over the past two decades, however, interest has expanded well beyond skeletal muscle, driven by growing recognition of the central role played by the creatine-phosphocreatine system in cerebral bioenergetics. Experimental evidence indicates that creatine contributes to neuronal energy homeostasis, mitochondrial function, membrane stability and potentially neuroprotection. This has fuelled growing enthusiasm for the idea that creatine supplementation might enhance cognitive function and benefit individuals with compromised cerebral metabolism. Yet, despite strong physiological plausibility, clinical findings remain inconsistent and often difficult to interpret. In this review, it is argued that the gap between proposed mechanisms and available clinical evidence reflects two distinct challenges: biological constraints on cerebral creatine availability after supplementation, and persistent methodological weaknesses in the clinical literature. We contend that the central challenge for the coming decade is not to identify new mechanisms of creatine action in the brain, but to establish, unequivocally, whether measurable changes in cerebral bioenergetics translate into meaningful cognitive benefit - whether as enhanced performance in healthy individuals or as clinically significant improvement in patient populations.
SN  - 0958-0670
SN  - 1469-445X
ER  -