Wildfire mobilization of arsenic into water resources: A scoping review of current literature.
- 1Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
- 2United States Environmental Protection Agency, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Abstract
Increasing wildfire activity poses a threat to water resources via the mobilization of hazardous materials such as arsenic (As). While As contamination of water resources is well studied, the fate and transport of As impacted by wildfire are not well characterized. This literature review synthesizes studies addressing the questions of: (1) Does fuel type influence how As is mobilized by wildfire?; (2) What mobilization pathways are most common for As when impacted by wildfires?; and (3) How are surface and groundwater As concentrations impacted by wildfire mobilization of As? To address this goal, articles were queried using Boolean search strings in Google Scholar, PubMed, and Web of Science and screened for relevance using PECO (Population, Exposure, Comparator, and Outcome) criteria. Twenty articles met the criteria, showing wildfire mobilization of As and changes in concentrations or loading of As to surface or groundwater. The majority of studies (16 of 20) showed an increase or a likely increase in As in waterbodies post-wildfire. Runoff to surface water was by far the dominant pathway. Average values typically did not exceed drinking water standards, although six studies reported instances where this occurred, with one reporting exceedances in treated drinking water itself. The largest value of dissolved As reported across surveyed literature (70 μg/L) was measured downgradient of a legacy mining operation post-wildfire. Higher values were also observed downstream of burned agricultural or urban areas, illustrating how human activities concentrate As, which can then be subsequently mobilized by wildfire. In contrast to surface water, groundwater impacts were inconsistent in the limited literature, with one study showing an increase in post-wildfire As, while the other two studies showed no-change. Overall, these results suggest communities may need to test drinking water supplies for As following wildfire, especially in cases where mining, agricultural, or urbanized areas are burned.
Related
- Metallochaperone protein OsHIPP36 is involved in arsenic(III) tolerance and translocation in rice (Oryza sativa L.)
- Twist-Controlled Second-Order Spatial Differentiation in a Three-Sheet Black Arsenic Stack
- Mitigation of arsenic toxicity in natural waters using a bacterial biomineralizing system
- A Colorimetric Strategy for Arsenic(V) Determination in Rice via Boosting the Peroxidase-like Activity of NCuzyme
- Arsenic-sensing domain controls ACR3 transporter trafficking in Marchantia polymorpha.
BibTeX
@article{willeford2026wildfire,
title = {{Wildfire mobilization of arsenic into water resources: A scoping review of current literature.}},
author = {Jordan Willeford and Leigh Moorhead and Kai Malone and Alexis Payton and Janice S Lee and Julia E Rager and Stephen D LeDuc},
journal = {PLOS water},
year = {2026},
month = aug,
doi = {10.1371/journal.pwat.0000549},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42898924},
note = {Public domain},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Wildfire mobilization of arsenic into water resources: A scoping review of current literature.
AU - Jordan Willeford
AU - Leigh Moorhead
AU - Kai Malone
AU - Alexis Payton
AU - Janice S Lee
AU - Julia E Rager
AU - Stephen D LeDuc
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/08/19
JO - PLOS water
DO - 10.1371/journal.pwat.0000549
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42898924
AB - Increasing wildfire activity poses a threat to water resources via the mobilization of hazardous materials such as arsenic (As). While As contamination of water resources is well studied, the fate and transport of As impacted by wildfire are not well characterized. This literature review synthesizes studies addressing the questions of: (1) Does fuel type influence how As is mobilized by wildfire?; (2) What mobilization pathways are most common for As when impacted by wildfires?; and (3) How are surface and groundwater As concentrations impacted by wildfire mobilization of As? To address this goal, articles were queried using Boolean search strings in Google Scholar, PubMed, and Web of Science and screened for relevance using PECO (Population, Exposure, Comparator, and Outcome) criteria. Twenty articles met the criteria, showing wildfire mobilization of As and changes in concentrations or loading of As to surface or groundwater. The majority of studies (16 of 20) showed an increase or a likely increase in As in waterbodies post-wildfire. Runoff to surface water was by far the dominant pathway. Average values typically did not exceed drinking water standards, although six studies reported instances where this occurred, with one reporting exceedances in treated drinking water itself. The largest value of dissolved As reported across surveyed literature (70 μg/L) was measured downgradient of a legacy mining operation post-wildfire. Higher values were also observed downstream of burned agricultural or urban areas, illustrating how human activities concentrate As, which can then be subsequently mobilized by wildfire. In contrast to surface water, groundwater impacts were inconsistent in the limited literature, with one study showing an increase in post-wildfire As, while the other two studies showed no-change. Overall, these results suggest communities may need to test drinking water supplies for As following wildfire, especially in cases where mining, agricultural, or urbanized areas are burned.
SN - 2767-3219
ER -