Comparison of three emergency department triage systems among Thai medical students: A randomized three-period crossover simulation study
4 affiliations
- 1Department of Emergency Medicine, Lampang Hospital, Lampang, Thailand
- 2Chaiprakarn Hospital, Chiang Mai, Thailand
- 3Clinical Epidemiology and Clinical Statistics Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok, Thailand
- 4Department of Radiology, Buddhachinaraj Phitsanulok Hospital, Phitsanulok, Thailand
Abstract
Introduction: In Thailand, the Emergency Severity Index (ESI) and Ministry of Public Health Emergency Department triage system (MOPH) are commonly used, whereas the Thai Rapid Initial Assessment and Grading for Emergency (TRIAGE) system has been newly proposed. Comparative evidence is limited. We compared correct triage as the primary outcome, with under-triage, over-triage, and completion time as secondary outcomes. Methods: We conducted a randomized three-period crossover simulation study at the Lampang Medical Education Center from October 2025 to January 2026. Fifth- and sixth-year medical students without recent standardized triage reinforcement classified 50 standardized patient cards per system in one of six sequences, with a one-week washout between periods. Multilevel mixed-effects models were used to estimate between-system differences, with adjustment for period, sequence, and academic year. Results: Sixty students completed all periods. No significant overall differences were detected in correct triage across TRIAGE, ESI, and MOPH (63.2%, 64.5%, and 61.8%, respectively), or in under-triage (19.6%, 20.0%, and 18.8%). Among sixth-year students, correct triage differed significantly across systems (global P = 0.004), with higher adjusted probabilities for ESI and TRIAGE than MOPH. Over-triage differed across systems and was highest with MOPH (7.0%), followed by TRIAGE (5.7%) and ESI (4.9%). Completion time was longest with TRIAGE (32.8 minutes), compared with ESI (24.3 minutes) and MOPH (23.2 minutes). Conclusion: No significant overall differences in correct or under-triage were detected, but the study was not powered to establish equivalence. MOPH showed higher over-triage, Completion time was longest with TRIAGE. Generalizability to experienced clinicians requires further study. Trial registration: Thai Clinical Trials Registry (TCTR) TCTR20260316003
Related
- Artificial Intelligence-Driven Cost Savings from Emergency Department Chest Pain Patient Evaluation: A Monte Carlo Simulation.
- Short-Term Pain Outcomes of Trigger Point Injection Versus Dry Needling for Acute Myofascial Low Back Pain in the Emergency Department: A Prospective Randomized Comparative Study
- Effect of Early Tourniquet Release on Hemolysis in Emergency Department Phlebotomy: The TOURNI-ED Randomized Trial.
- Retrospective Comparison of the Pericapsular Nerve Group Block Versus the Fascia Iliaca Block for Hip Fractures in the Emergency Department.
- A non-inferiority randomized controlled trial comparing nebulized fentanyl and intravenous morphine for acute pain management in the emergency department.
BibTeX
@article{yaowalaorng2026comparison,
title = {{Comparison of three emergency department triage systems among Thai medical students: A randomized three-period crossover simulation study}},
author = {Jarupa Yaowalaorng and Thanin Lokeskrawee and Natthaphon Pruksathorn and Suppachai Lawanaskol and Jayanton Patumanond and Chanitda Wicha and Wanwisa Bumrungpagdee and Suwapim Chanlaor and Chawalit Lakdee},
journal = {PLOS One},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0350690},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0350690},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Comparison of three emergency department triage systems among Thai medical students: A randomized three-period crossover simulation study
AU - Jarupa Yaowalaorng
AU - Thanin Lokeskrawee
AU - Natthaphon Pruksathorn
AU - Suppachai Lawanaskol
AU - Jayanton Patumanond
AU - Chanitda Wicha
AU - Wanwisa Bumrungpagdee
AU - Suwapim Chanlaor
AU - Chawalit Lakdee
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/26
JO - PLOS One
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0350690
UR - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0350690
AB - Introduction: In Thailand, the Emergency Severity Index (ESI) and Ministry of Public Health Emergency Department triage system (MOPH) are commonly used, whereas the Thai Rapid Initial Assessment and Grading for Emergency (TRIAGE) system has been newly proposed. Comparative evidence is limited. We compared correct triage as the primary outcome, with under-triage, over-triage, and completion time as secondary outcomes. Methods: We conducted a randomized three-period crossover simulation study at the Lampang Medical Education Center from October 2025 to January 2026. Fifth- and sixth-year medical students without recent standardized triage reinforcement classified 50 standardized patient cards per system in one of six sequences, with a one-week washout between periods. Multilevel mixed-effects models were used to estimate between-system differences, with adjustment for period, sequence, and academic year. Results: Sixty students completed all periods. No significant overall differences were detected in correct triage across TRIAGE, ESI, and MOPH (63.2%, 64.5%, and 61.8%, respectively), or in under-triage (19.6%, 20.0%, and 18.8%). Among sixth-year students, correct triage differed significantly across systems (global P = 0.004), with higher adjusted probabilities for ESI and TRIAGE than MOPH. Over-triage differed across systems and was highest with MOPH (7.0%), followed by TRIAGE (5.7%) and ESI (4.9%). Completion time was longest with TRIAGE (32.8 minutes), compared with ESI (24.3 minutes) and MOPH (23.2 minutes). Conclusion: No significant overall differences in correct or under-triage were detected, but the study was not powered to establish equivalence. MOPH showed higher over-triage, Completion time was longest with TRIAGE. Generalizability to experienced clinicians requires further study. Trial registration: Thai Clinical Trials Registry (TCTR) TCTR20260316003
SN - 1932-6203
ER -