Improving the predictability of rotational correction with clear aligners: Evidence gaps, biomechanical principles, and clinical strategies
- 1Department of Orthodontics & Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Manav Rachna Dental College, Manav Rachna International Institute of Research and Studies (MRIIRS), Faridabad, India; Corresponding author.
- 2School of Dental Sciences, School of Allied Health Sciences, Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Manav Rachna International Institute of Research and Studies (MRIIRS), Faridabad, India
- 3Department of Orthodontics, University of Illinois Chicago College of Dentistry, Chicago, IL, 60607, USA; Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai, India; Paediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
Abstract
Clear aligner therapy (CAT) has evolved from an aesthetic modality into a widely used orthodontic treatment system capable of addressing increasingly complex malocclusions. Improvements in thermoplastic materials, digital planning, staging protocols, and attachment design have broadened the scope of treatment; however, rotational correction remains one of the least predictable tooth movements. The expression of derotation is influenced by tooth morphology, rotational direction, magnitude of correction, available space, staging velocity, attachment geometry, wear compliance, and unintended three-dimensional side effects. Yet much of the available evidence continues to evaluate rotation as a single endpoint, thereby limiting the clinical utility of reported predictability estimates. This narrative review synthesises clinical, systematic-review, and biomechanical evidence on rotational correction with clear aligners, emphasising movement-specific determinants, evidence limitations, and practical management strategies. The available literature suggests that derotation may be more predictable when treatment planning accounts for tooth-specific anatomy, movement magnitude and direction, space availability, staging strategy, attachment design, and treatment compliance. For severe or resistant rotations, adjunctive or hybrid mechanics may be considered when adequate expression cannot be achieved with aligner-only mechanics. Overall, a movement-specific and biomechanics-informed approach may help improve the clinical management of rotational correction, although further prospective evidence is needed to establish the relative contribution of individual treatment variables.
Related
- Biomechanical stabilization of the keratoconic cornea: a review of current therapeutic strategies.
- Reflex‐Mediated Bradycardia and Asystole During Skull Base and Parapharyngeal Surgery: A Three‐Case Series Highlighting Anatomical Predictability
- Predictability of symptom changes following hemithyroidectomy due to compression symptoms assessed by specific questionnaires: prospective multicentre study.
- Persistent Belief Updating Despite Perfect Predictability – The Atypical Iterative Prior Updating Account Of Autism
- The role of microbiota on thyroid cancer: from carcinogenicity, treatment and predictability
BibTeX
@article{kulkarni2026improving,
title = {{Improving the predictability of rotational correction with clear aligners: Evidence gaps, biomechanical principles, and clinical strategies}},
author = {Preeti Kulkarni and Puneet Batra and Nikhillesh Vaiid},
journal = {Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research},
year = {2026},
month = nov,
doi = {10.1016/j.jobcr.2026.101567},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobcr.2026.101567},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Improving the predictability of rotational correction with clear aligners: Evidence gaps, biomechanical principles, and clinical strategies
AU - Preeti Kulkarni
AU - Puneet Batra
AU - Nikhillesh Vaiid
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/11/01
JO - Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research
DO - 10.1016/j.jobcr.2026.101567
UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobcr.2026.101567
AB - Clear aligner therapy (CAT) has evolved from an aesthetic modality into a widely used orthodontic treatment system capable of addressing increasingly complex malocclusions. Improvements in thermoplastic materials, digital planning, staging protocols, and attachment design have broadened the scope of treatment; however, rotational correction remains one of the least predictable tooth movements. The expression of derotation is influenced by tooth morphology, rotational direction, magnitude of correction, available space, staging velocity, attachment geometry, wear compliance, and unintended three-dimensional side effects. Yet much of the available evidence continues to evaluate rotation as a single endpoint, thereby limiting the clinical utility of reported predictability estimates. This narrative review synthesises clinical, systematic-review, and biomechanical evidence on rotational correction with clear aligners, emphasising movement-specific determinants, evidence limitations, and practical management strategies. The available literature suggests that derotation may be more predictable when treatment planning accounts for tooth-specific anatomy, movement magnitude and direction, space availability, staging strategy, attachment design, and treatment compliance. For severe or resistant rotations, adjunctive or hybrid mechanics may be considered when adequate expression cannot be achieved with aligner-only mechanics. Overall, a movement-specific and biomechanics-informed approach may help improve the clinical management of rotational correction, although further prospective evidence is needed to establish the relative contribution of individual treatment variables.
SN - 2212-4268
SN - 2212-4276
ER -