Household environmental management practices, community engagement, and self-reported malaria incidence in urban and rural communities of Malawi
- 1Institute of International Development and Partnership, ITMO University
- 2International Centre for Health Economics, Management, and Policy, HSE University
Abstract
Malaria control in Malawi relies primarily on long-lasting insecticide-treated nets (LLITNs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS), but transmission remains heterogeneous across districts. Previous research indicates that community-based environmental management strategies, such as routine drainage maintenance, vegetation removal, and effective household waste disposal, may reduce environmental conditions conducive to malaria vector proliferation. This study investigated the association between environmental management practices at both household and community levels and self-reported cases of malaria in Malawi. We disseminated an online survey through social media from December 2024 to February 2025, targeting adults in both rural and urban locales, resulting in 282 participants. Negative binomial regression was employed to assess the relationship between preventive measures, household-level environmental management practices, community engagement, and malaria cases during the past year. LLITNs were the most used preventive measure (62.1%). Their use was significantly associated with fewer malaria cases in rural areas ( p = 0.035) but more malaria cases in urban areas ( p = 0.018). Household-level (94.3%) and community-level (70.9%) environmental management practices were widely reported but showed weak and area-dependent associations with malaria incidence. Regardless of area of residence, respondents faced difficulties maintaining these practices, mostly due to time constraints (49.3%) and financial constraints (61.3%). Strengthening community education, resource support, and integration of environmental management into existing programs is likely to be needed to sustain these practices. The contrasting rural–urban patterns may reflect unmeasured differences in local transmission intensity and warrant investigation in studies with geographically resolved data.
Related
- Caregivers’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding household product safety and poisoning prevention in children in Saudi Arabia
- Knowledge, risk perception and household practices related to indoor chemical pollution in the United Arab Emirates
- When communities resist: The critical role of risk communication and community engagement in the 2026 Ebola outbreak response
- Differences in household meat handling, storage, and consumption practices by educational level during Eid al-Adha in Türkiye: a cross-sectional study
- Beyond the market: Food safety knowledge and practices among female household food handlers in the domestic kitchen
BibTeX
@article{lungu2026household,
title = {{Household environmental management practices, community engagement, and self-reported malaria incidence in urban and rural communities of Malawi}},
author = {Memory Magdalene Lungu and Arsen Davitadze},
journal = {Frontiers in Public Health},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3389/fpubh.2026.1919768},
url = {https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1919768/full},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Household environmental management practices, community engagement, and self-reported malaria incidence in urban and rural communities of Malawi
AU - Memory Magdalene Lungu
AU - Arsen Davitadze
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/14
JO - Frontiers in Public Health
DO - 10.3389/fpubh.2026.1919768
UR - https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1919768/full
AB - Malaria control in Malawi relies primarily on long-lasting insecticide-treated nets (LLITNs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS), but transmission remains heterogeneous across districts. Previous research indicates that community-based environmental management strategies, such as routine drainage maintenance, vegetation removal, and effective household waste disposal, may reduce environmental conditions conducive to malaria vector proliferation. This study investigated the association between environmental management practices at both household and community levels and self-reported cases of malaria in Malawi. We disseminated an online survey through social media from December 2024 to February 2025, targeting adults in both rural and urban locales, resulting in 282 participants. Negative binomial regression was employed to assess the relationship between preventive measures, household-level environmental management practices, community engagement, and malaria cases during the past year. LLITNs were the most used preventive measure (62.1%). Their use was significantly associated with fewer malaria cases in rural areas ( p = 0.035) but more malaria cases in urban areas ( p = 0.018). Household-level (94.3%) and community-level (70.9%) environmental management practices were widely reported but showed weak and area-dependent associations with malaria incidence. Regardless of area of residence, respondents faced difficulties maintaining these practices, mostly due to time constraints (49.3%) and financial constraints (61.3%). Strengthening community education, resource support, and integration of environmental management into existing programs is likely to be needed to sustain these practices. The contrasting rural–urban patterns may reflect unmeasured differences in local transmission intensity and warrant investigation in studies with geographically resolved data.
SN - 2296-2565
ER -