Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 14 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0PLOS One

The effects of dynamic, static, and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching on local & non-local range of motion and pain onset

  1. 1School of Human Kinetics and Recreation, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada

Abstract

This study compared the immediate effects of a single 30-second stretching bout on local (stretched) and non-local (non-stretched) range of motion (ROM), pain sensitivity/onset, strength, and endurance. Fourteen participants were involved with this within-subjects, repeated-measures study, consisting of four conditions: 30-seconds of static (SS), proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF), dynamic (DS) stretching, and a no-stretch control condition. Passive hip flexion and shoulder extension ROM, pain pressure thresholds (PPT), knee flexors and right shoulder extension maximum voluntary isometric contraction force (MVIC), 30-s MVIC fatigue index and muscle activation (electromyography: EMG) were measured pre- and post-intervention. The primary findings were that 30-seconds of SS elicited greater moderate magnitude ROM improvements in the stretched limb (p < 0.001, 8.1%) compared to control. Non- significant (p = 0.08) SS-induced ROM gains were observed with the contralateral leg inferring the possibility of crossover effects in some individuals. There were no significant effects on the shoulder with any intervention. All conditions including control experienced MVIC force decreases with the stretched limb (p = 0.007). However, there were no significant PPT interactions. Women demonstrated greater ROM whereas men exhibited greater force, EMG activity, and fatigue indices. In conclusion, while passive ROM improved across all conditions, these gains can be accompanied by declines in MVIC force. Overall, 30-seconds elicited significant increases in ROM of the stretched leg respectively; however, it failed to produce any significant effects on the contralateral leg and shoulder.

Related

  1. Effects of cervical stability exercises using proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation on physical function and activity in patients with neck pain and forward head posture : A randomized controlled trial
    Beom Ryong Kim
    MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMCPMC
  2. Neuromuscular Activation Patterns of the Gastrocnemius Muscle During Static and Dynamic Sprint Starts: Implications for Acceleration Training.
    Ana Ferri-Caruana, Christian Castilla-Díaz, Angel Saez-Berlanga +1
    Journal of functional morphology and kinesiologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Population-specific responses to static stretching: lack of acute effects on vertical jump height following high stretching volumes.
    Marco Alessandria, Arianna Manavella, Sara Ortuso +2
    BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitationPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMCPMC
  4. Feasibility Investigation on the Effects of a 6‐Week Whole‐Body Static Stretching Program in Active Adults With Type 1 Diabetes on Blood Glucose and Insulin Sensitivity
    Salvatore Frenda, Masatoshi Nakamura, Konstantin Warneke +3
    Lifestyle MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEndocrinology & metabolismDOAJ
  5. Fast Dynamic Voluntary Contractions Enhance Corticospinal Facilitation of the Human Diaphragm: A Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Study
    Alexandre Demoule, Eric Verin, Capucine Morélot-Panzini +2
    Physiological ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BYNeurologyHAL
BibTeX
@article{parsons2026effects,
  title = {{The effects of dynamic, static, and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching on local & non-local range of motion and pain onset}},
  author = {Hunter Parsons and David G. Behm},
  journal = {PLOS One},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0358885},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0358885},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - The effects of dynamic, static, and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching on local & non-local range of motion and pain onset
AU  - Hunter Parsons
AU  - David G. Behm
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/21
JO  - PLOS One
DO  - 10.1371/journal.pone.0358885
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0358885
AB  - This study compared the immediate effects of a single 30-second stretching bout on local (stretched) and non-local (non-stretched) range of motion (ROM), pain sensitivity/onset, strength, and endurance. Fourteen participants were involved with this within-subjects, repeated-measures study, consisting of four conditions: 30-seconds of static (SS), proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF), dynamic (DS) stretching, and a no-stretch control condition. Passive hip flexion and shoulder extension ROM, pain pressure thresholds (PPT), knee flexors and right shoulder extension maximum voluntary isometric contraction force (MVIC), 30-s MVIC fatigue index and muscle activation (electromyography: EMG) were measured pre- and post-intervention. The primary findings were that 30-seconds of SS elicited greater moderate magnitude ROM improvements in the stretched limb (p < 0.001, 8.1%) compared to control. Non- significant (p = 0.08) SS-induced ROM gains were observed with the contralateral leg inferring the possibility of crossover effects in some individuals. There were no significant effects on the shoulder with any intervention. All conditions including control experienced MVIC force decreases with the stretched limb (p = 0.007). However, there were no significant PPT interactions. Women demonstrated greater ROM whereas men exhibited greater force, EMG activity, and fatigue indices. In conclusion, while passive ROM improved across all conditions, these gains can be accompanied by declines in MVIC force. Overall, 30-seconds elicited significant increases in ROM of the stretched leg respectively; however, it failed to produce any significant effects on the contralateral leg and shoulder.
SN  - 1932-6203
ER  -