Prevailing income-based disparities in cardiovascular events in young hospitalized adults with cannabis use disorder: insights from a population-based analysis
11 affiliations
- 1Covenant Healthcare College of Medicine at Central Michigan University
- 2Department of Internal Medicine, Detroit Medical Center, Sinai-Grace
- 3Department of Internal medicine, St. Luke’s Hospital
- 4Mamata Medical College
- 5Department of Internal Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center Permian Basin
- 6Department of internal medicine, Dr. V.R.K. Women’s medical college, teaching hospital and research center
- 7Department of Internal Medicine, Transitional year Resident, Nazareth Hospital
- 8GCS Medical College, Hospital, and Research Center
- 9Shadan Institute of Medical Sciences
- 10Department of Internal Medicine, Harlingen Medical Center
- 11Independent Outcomes Researcher
Abstract
Introduction Cannabis use and low socioeconomic status are recognized as distinct risk factors for cardiovascular pathologies. This retrospective cross-sectional study aims to investigate the association between income status and cardiovascular disease risk among young hospitalized adults with recreational cannabis use or cannabis use disorder (CUD). Methods We analyzed young adult hospitalizations (18–44 years) with known CUD from the 2020 National Inpatient Sample. Propensity score-matched analysis (1:1) was used to compare comorbidities and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) between the high-income quartile (HIQ) and low-income quartile (LIQ) within the CUD cohort. Results Out of the young adult admissions, a total of 286,855 individuals were identified as recreational cannabis users. After propensity matching, we divided the CUD cohort into 63,355 patients with HIQ (41.1% female) and LIQ (41.4% female). While both cohorts exhibited comparable ages and racial distribution (> 65% white), the individuals from the LIQ cohort were predominantly from the South (45.7% vs. 27.9%), visiting rural hospitals (13.9% vs. 1.3%), with Medicaid (56.3% vs. 41.1%) as the predominant payer. Additionally, the LIQ cohort had a higher prevalence of drug abuse (65.5% vs. 58.4%), tobacco use (24.9% vs. 22.6%), HTN (17% vs. 14.7%), chronic pulmonary disease (13.2% vs. 12.7%), DM (8% vs. 6.6%), and obesity (10.9% vs. 10.0%). Additionally, in-hospital outcomes like MACCE (2% vs. 0.8%) and acute ischemic stroke (AIS) (0.5% vs. 0.3%) were higher in the LIQ cohort (Graphical Abstract). After adjusting for confounding factors, the risk of AIS in the HIQ cohort was 37% lower than in the LIQ cohort (OR: 0.63 [95% CI: 0.42–0.96]). All p values < 0.05. Conclusion Higher prevalence of CVD risk factors in the LIQ-CUD group and lower odds of AIS-related admissions in the HIQ-CUD group warrant targeted interventions and policy measures to understand and address the behavioral risk of cannabis use by economic status and disparities in MACCE. Graphical Abstract
Related
- Cannabis legalisation and cardiovascular hospitalisations in the United States: nationwide difference-in-differences analysis, 2012–2018
- Rural/Urban Disparities in Pneumococcal Vaccine Service Delivery Among the Fee-for-Service Medicare Population
- The effect of regional disparities in access to rehabilitation services on mortality among stroke patients : A Korean nationwide population-based retrospective cohort study
- Trends and disparities in cerebrovascular disease mortality among patients with bronchus and lung cancer in the United States, 1999–2020: a population-based retrospective study
- Trends and racial and ethnic disparities in prepregnancy obesity severity at first live birth in the US, 2015–2024: a population-based cross-sectional study
BibTeX
@article{mohammed2026prevailing,
title = {{Prevailing income-based disparities in cardiovascular events in young hospitalized adults with cannabis use disorder: insights from a population-based analysis}},
author = {Adil Sarvar Mohammed and Hafeezuddin Ahmed and Suvidha Manne and Umera Yasmeen and Bhagya Lakshmi Devarala and Jasiya Amreen and Sravya Gayatri Vanukuru and Pooja Suchday and Iramunisa Begum and Harshavardhan Polamarasetty and Rupak Desai and Muhammad Usman Ghani},
journal = {BMC Public Health},
year = {2026},
month = jul,
doi = {10.1186/s12889-026-28623-3},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-026-28623-3},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Prevailing income-based disparities in cardiovascular events in young hospitalized adults with cannabis use disorder: insights from a population-based analysis
AU - Adil Sarvar Mohammed
AU - Hafeezuddin Ahmed
AU - Suvidha Manne
AU - Umera Yasmeen
AU - Bhagya Lakshmi Devarala
AU - Jasiya Amreen
AU - Sravya Gayatri Vanukuru
AU - Pooja Suchday
AU - Iramunisa Begum
AU - Harshavardhan Polamarasetty
AU - Rupak Desai
AU - Muhammad Usman Ghani
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/07/01
JO - BMC Public Health
DO - 10.1186/s12889-026-28623-3
UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-026-28623-3
AB - Introduction Cannabis use and low socioeconomic status are recognized as distinct risk factors for cardiovascular pathologies. This retrospective cross-sectional study aims to investigate the association between income status and cardiovascular disease risk among young hospitalized adults with recreational cannabis use or cannabis use disorder (CUD). Methods We analyzed young adult hospitalizations (18–44 years) with known CUD from the 2020 National Inpatient Sample. Propensity score-matched analysis (1:1) was used to compare comorbidities and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) between the high-income quartile (HIQ) and low-income quartile (LIQ) within the CUD cohort. Results Out of the young adult admissions, a total of 286,855 individuals were identified as recreational cannabis users. After propensity matching, we divided the CUD cohort into 63,355 patients with HIQ (41.1% female) and LIQ (41.4% female). While both cohorts exhibited comparable ages and racial distribution (> 65% white), the individuals from the LIQ cohort were predominantly from the South (45.7% vs. 27.9%), visiting rural hospitals (13.9% vs. 1.3%), with Medicaid (56.3% vs. 41.1%) as the predominant payer. Additionally, the LIQ cohort had a higher prevalence of drug abuse (65.5% vs. 58.4%), tobacco use (24.9% vs. 22.6%), HTN (17% vs. 14.7%), chronic pulmonary disease (13.2% vs. 12.7%), DM (8% vs. 6.6%), and obesity (10.9% vs. 10.0%). Additionally, in-hospital outcomes like MACCE (2% vs. 0.8%) and acute ischemic stroke (AIS) (0.5% vs. 0.3%) were higher in the LIQ cohort (Graphical Abstract). After adjusting for confounding factors, the risk of AIS in the HIQ cohort was 37% lower than in the LIQ cohort (OR: 0.63 [95% CI: 0.42–0.96]). All p values < 0.05. Conclusion Higher prevalence of CVD risk factors in the LIQ-CUD group and lower odds of AIS-related admissions in the HIQ-CUD group warrant targeted interventions and policy measures to understand and address the behavioral risk of cannabis use by economic status and disparities in MACCE. Graphical Abstract
SN - 1471-2458
ER -