Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
223,421 studies31 sourcesUpdated 16 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0The British Journal of General Practice

Learning disability register enrolment in young people in England: a cohort study using primary care data

4 affiliations
  1. 1Mohn Centre for Children’s Health and Wellbeing, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
  2. 2University of Sunderland, Sunderland, UK
  3. 3Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
  4. 4Department of Primary Care & Population Health, University College London, London, UK

Abstract

Background: Learning disability registers in UK primary care support proactive care, but under-identification remains substantial. The 2019 NHS Long Term Plan introduced targets to increase enrolment.

Aim: To estimate prevalence and rates of new registration to learning disability registers among young people aged 14–24 years in England and examine changes following the introduction of national targets.

Design and setting: Population-based open cohort study using routinely collected primary care data from general practices in England contributing to the Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum database, 2015–2023.

Method: Young people aged 14–24 years who had been registered ≥6 months were included. Annual rates of new registration per 10 000 person-years at risk (PYAR) and recorded prevalence were calculated, stratified by age, sex, region, and year.

Results: Between 2015 and 2023, 11 776 young people were first recorded on a learning disability register. Rates of new registration increased in 2020–2021 across ages and sexes, peaking at 15.8 per 10 000 PYAR in males aged 14–17 years and 8.4 per 10 000 in females before returning to pre-2019 levels by 2023. Recorded prevalence remained low overall (0.03–0.5%; 3.6–52.7 per 10 000) but increased among those aged 18–24 years, with eight-to-10-fold rises between 2015 and 2023. Prevalence was higher in males (rate ratios 1.7–1.8, 95% confidence interval = 1.6 to 1.9).

Conclusion: National targets coincided with a temporary rise in enrolment, but identification remains below expected prevalence. Sustained policy focus and systematic identification and coding by practices are needed to ensure equitable access to preventive care during the transition to adulthood.

Related

  1. Learning disability register enrolment in young people in England: Cohort Study, 2015–2023
    RS Shah, K Horridge, S Saxena +2
    The European Journal of Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textEpidemiology & public healthPMCEurope PMC
  2. Disparities in the uptake of learning disability annual health checks: a secondary analysis of primary care data
    Daniel Sutherland, Benjamin Costello, Umesh Chauhan +5
    The British Journal of General PracticePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full text1 citedEpidemiology & public healthPMC
  3. Edentulism and functional disability in older adults: A longitudinal and cross-national study in England, the United States, and India
    Wanqi Tang, Libang He, Min Zhang +1
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textDevelopmental biologyStatisticsPLOSEurope PMCPMC
  4. Prognosis of 1st time revision due to pain following primary total hip arthroplasty - a nationwide cohort study from the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register
    P. P. Hald, S. M. Aljuboori, S. Overgaard
    medRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textSurgery & anaesthesiamedRxiv
  5. Association between cemented and uncemented cups and risk of revision in patients aged 65 years or older following primary total hip arthroplasty: a study of 310,515 patients from the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association.
    Roshan Latifi, Simon Kornvig, Maziar Mohaddes +7
    Acta orthopaedicaPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMCPMC
BibTeX
@article{shah2026learning,
  title = {{Learning disability register enrolment in young people in England: a cohort study using primary care data}},
  author = {Rakhee Shah and Karen Horridge and Sonia Saxena and Dougal S Hargreaves and Irene Petersen},
  journal = {The British Journal of General Practice},
  year = {2026},
  month = aug,
  doi = {10.3399/bjgp.2026.0160},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp.2026.0160},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Learning disability register enrolment in young people in England: a cohort study using primary care data
AU  - Rakhee Shah
AU  - Karen Horridge
AU  - Sonia Saxena
AU  - Dougal S Hargreaves
AU  - Irene Petersen
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/08/11
JO  - The British Journal of General Practice
DO  - 10.3399/bjgp.2026.0160
UR  - https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp.2026.0160
AB  - Background: Learning disability registers in UK primary care support proactive care, but under-identification remains substantial. The 2019 NHS Long Term Plan introduced targets to increase enrolment.  Aim: To estimate prevalence and rates of new registration to learning disability registers among young people aged 14–24 years in England and examine changes following the introduction of national targets.  Design and setting: Population-based open cohort study using routinely collected primary care data from general practices in England contributing to the Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum database, 2015–2023.  Method: Young people aged 14–24 years who had been registered ≥6 months were included. Annual rates of new registration per 10 000 person-years at risk (PYAR) and recorded prevalence were calculated, stratified by age, sex, region, and year.  Results: Between 2015 and 2023, 11 776 young people were first recorded on a learning disability register. Rates of new registration increased in 2020–2021 across ages and sexes, peaking at 15.8 per 10 000 PYAR in males aged 14–17 years and 8.4 per 10 000 in females before returning to pre-2019 levels by 2023. Recorded prevalence remained low overall (0.03–0.5%; 3.6–52.7 per 10 000) but increased among those aged 18–24 years, with eight-to-10-fold rises between 2015 and 2023. Prevalence was higher in males (rate ratios 1.7–1.8, 95% confidence interval = 1.6 to 1.9).  Conclusion: National targets coincided with a temporary rise in enrolment, but identification remains below expected prevalence. Sustained policy focus and systematic identification and coding by practices are needed to ensure equitable access to preventive care during the transition to adulthood.
SN  - 0960-1643
SN  - 1478-5242
ER  -