Analyzing Water Governance in Iran from the Perspective of Social Consequences of Inter-Basin Water Transfer
- 1Department of Political Geography, Faculty of Geography, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
- 2Department of Cultural and Social Governance, Faculty of Governance, College of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract
The unbalanced development and uneven distribution of water, soil, and population in Iran have resulted in significant temporal and spatial disparities between water availability and consumption. Under these circumstances, the imperative of ensuring a sustainable supply of drinking water, as a fundamental mandate of governance, has compelled policymakers to adopt various strategies, among which Inter-Basin Water Transfer (IBWT) stands out as a critical intervention. Despite its potential efficacy in alleviating water scarcity in arid regions, IBWT is not merely a technical solution; rather, it entails a complex array of social consequences that can exert profound and often deleterious impacts on both donor and recipient communities. This qualitative study aims to identify and explicate the social consequences of IBWT in Iran, with a specific focus on the Central Plateau. Data were gathered through semi-structured interviews with 21 experts in the fields of water governance and hydropolitics, and subsequently analyzed using Thematic Analysis. Participants were selected via purposive sampling, and the data collection process continued until theoretical saturation was achieved. The findings yielded 6 main themes, 17 sub-themes, and 106 codes, highlighting a broad spectrum of adverse social consequences associated with IBWT projects. The primary themes that emerged from the analysis are: (1) erosion of social capital and public trust, (2) divergence and threats to national solidarity, (3) inequality and perceived discrimination, (4) demographic metamorphoses and settlement vulnerabilities, (5) politicization of water and instrumental exploitation, and (6) civilizational-biological decay and social health. The study concludes that while IBWT can serve as an instrument for fulfilling the state's mandate to supply drinking water, given its significant social ramifications, such policies should be regarded strictly as a measure of last resort, to be considered only after the exhaustive implementation of alternative strategies, including demand management, efficiency enhancement, and consumption pattern reform.
Related
- Corporate governance and Environmental, Social, and Governance practices as drivers of alignment with the sustainable development goals: Evidence from Bangladesh
- Does roadless rule? Social-ecological consequences of the Roadless Area Conservation Rule
- Moderate grazing enhances the connectivity and stability of social-ecological systems: Insights for zoned governance in the Yarlung Zangbo River Basin
- Automated small-scale devices and robotic systems for analyzing the cellular impact of ambient aerosol particles
- Analyzing Milankovitch cycles in a cyclostratigraphic and sequence stratigraphic framework using core and well logging data, the Asmari formation, the Dezful embayment, southwestern Iran
BibTeX
@article{kiani2026analyzing,
title = {{Analyzing Water Governance in Iran from the Perspective of Social Consequences of Inter-Basin Water Transfer}},
author = {Mohammadali Kiani and Afsaneh Dehghanpour-Farashah},
journal = {حکمرانی منابع طبیعی},
year = {2026},
month = jun,
doi = {10.22059/jnrg.2026.410584.1090},
url = {https://doi.org/10.22059/jnrg.2026.410584.1090},
note = {CC BY-NC},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Analyzing Water Governance in Iran from the Perspective of Social Consequences of Inter-Basin Water Transfer
AU - Mohammadali Kiani
AU - Afsaneh Dehghanpour-Farashah
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/06/01
JO - حکمرانی منابع طبیعی
DO - 10.22059/jnrg.2026.410584.1090
UR - https://doi.org/10.22059/jnrg.2026.410584.1090
AB - The unbalanced development and uneven distribution of water, soil, and population in Iran have resulted in significant temporal and spatial disparities between water availability and consumption. Under these circumstances, the imperative of ensuring a sustainable supply of drinking water, as a fundamental mandate of governance, has compelled policymakers to adopt various strategies, among which Inter-Basin Water Transfer (IBWT) stands out as a critical intervention. Despite its potential efficacy in alleviating water scarcity in arid regions, IBWT is not merely a technical solution; rather, it entails a complex array of social consequences that can exert profound and often deleterious impacts on both donor and recipient communities. This qualitative study aims to identify and explicate the social consequences of IBWT in Iran, with a specific focus on the Central Plateau. Data were gathered through semi-structured interviews with 21 experts in the fields of water governance and hydropolitics, and subsequently analyzed using Thematic Analysis. Participants were selected via purposive sampling, and the data collection process continued until theoretical saturation was achieved. The findings yielded 6 main themes, 17 sub-themes, and 106 codes, highlighting a broad spectrum of adverse social consequences associated with IBWT projects. The primary themes that emerged from the analysis are: (1) erosion of social capital and public trust, (2) divergence and threats to national solidarity, (3) inequality and perceived discrimination, (4) demographic metamorphoses and settlement vulnerabilities, (5) politicization of water and instrumental exploitation, and (6) civilizational-biological decay and social health. The study concludes that while IBWT can serve as an instrument for fulfilling the state's mandate to supply drinking water, given its significant social ramifications, such policies should be regarded strictly as a measure of last resort, to be considered only after the exhaustive implementation of alternative strategies, including demand management, efficiency enhancement, and consumption pattern reform.
SN - 3060-7183
ER -