Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 16 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NCbioRxiv

Cracking the predictive stability code: dual trial-by-trial spatio-temporo-spectral dynamics of task representation directional tuning by Bayesian conflict expectations

  1. 1Department of Neuroscience, University of Padova

Abstract

Cognitive stability, or task focus, enables goal-directed behavior through representational dynamics: by prioritizing task-relevant representations over competing task-irrelevant ones. Beyond corrective reactive mechanisms operating after conflict arises, stability can be deployed predictively through the statistical learning of conflict regularities, either proactively, guided by global conflict expectations, or through a predictive reactive mode guided by item-specific ones. Yet, the representational mechanisms enabling such predictive adjustments remain underspecified. We addressed this by re-analyzing EEG data from a spatial Stroop task concurrently manipulating list-wide (LWPC) and item-specific (ISPC) proportion congruency. Moving beyond existing analytical approaches, we developed a framework combining trial-by-trial Bayesian conflict-expectancy modeling with a novel spatio-temporo-spectral searchlight Representational Similarity Analysis, and leveraged directional representational modeling complemented by ridge-regression decoding. We first identified the necessary computational substrate for stability predictive reconfigurations: the spatio-temporo-spectral patterns encoding task (Target, Distractor) and conflict-expectancy (LWPC, ISPC) representations, the latter representations encoded already in the pre-stimulus windows. Crucially, conflict expectations modulated Target and Distractor encoding strength with distinct spatio-temporal and spectral dynamics, revealing a functional dissociation. LWPC-induced proactive stability follows a "Target-first" policy, primarily strengthening the Target early post-stimulus via Alpha and lower-Beta patterns, weakening Distractor encoding only later on; conversely, ISPC-induced predictive reactive stability follows a "Distractor-first" policy, rapidly weakening Distractor encoding via response-locked posterior Beta patterns, strengthening the Target only downstream. Our study refines theoretical cognitive control models, incorporating a mechanistic explanation for predictive stability, while also establishing a multidimensional methodological template for interrogating the underlying substrates of adaptive behavior and beyond.

Related

  1. Mechanical polarity links adhesion-regulated protrusions to directional stability in glioblastoma cell migration
    Haruna Tagawa, Daisuke Kanematsu, Asako Katsuma +3
    PLOS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textCell biologyDevelopmental biologyPLOS
  2. Operators matter \textendash An assessment of the expectations, perceptions, and performance of dentists, postgraduate students, and dental prosthetist students using intraoral scanning
    Khaled E. Ahmed, Karen G. Peres, Marco A. Peres +3
    Journal of DentistryPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text14 citedGeneral biologyEpidemiology & public healthHAL
  3. Short-term subjective and EEG responses following cervical rotatory manipulation are not reproduced by simulated cracking sound: A randomized controlled study
    Yuanxun Lin, Weixing Zhong, Meiling Yu +6
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeurosciencePhysiologyPLOS
  4. Perspectives on China's beef market: quality improvement driven by consumer expectations
    Yafang Cui, Qingxiang Meng, Zhenming Zhou +3
    Journal of Agriculture and Food ResearchPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full text1 citedZoology & animal behaviourHAL
  5. Active and total rhizosphere microbiomes of plant mixtures diverge from additive expectations, depending on nitrogen and plant composition
    J. E. Harris, E. Rice, C. Lowry +2
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textEcologybioRxiv
BibTeX
@misc{viviani2026cracking,
  title = {{Cracking the predictive stability code: dual trial-by-trial spatio-temporo-spectral dynamics of task representation directional tuning by Bayesian conflict expectations}},
  author = {G. Viviani and A. Visalli and M. Montefinese and I. Di Pietro and A. Vallesi and M. Ruz and E. Ambrosini},
  howpublished = {bioRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.09.20.752953},
  url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.20.752953v1},
  note = {CC BY-NC},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Cracking the predictive stability code: dual trial-by-trial spatio-temporo-spectral dynamics of task representation directional tuning by Bayesian conflict expectations
AU  - G. Viviani
AU  - A. Visalli
AU  - M. Montefinese
AU  - I. Di Pietro
AU  - A. Vallesi
AU  - M. Ruz
AU  - E. Ambrosini
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/20
PB  - bioRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.09.20.752953
UR  - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.20.752953v1
AB  - Cognitive stability, or task focus, enables goal-directed behavior through representational dynamics: by prioritizing task-relevant representations over competing task-irrelevant ones. Beyond corrective reactive mechanisms operating after conflict arises, stability can be deployed predictively through the statistical learning of conflict regularities, either proactively, guided by global conflict expectations, or through a predictive reactive mode guided by item-specific ones. Yet, the representational mechanisms enabling such predictive adjustments remain underspecified. We addressed this by re-analyzing EEG data from a spatial Stroop task concurrently manipulating list-wide (LWPC) and item-specific (ISPC) proportion congruency. Moving beyond existing analytical approaches, we developed a framework combining trial-by-trial Bayesian conflict-expectancy modeling with a novel spatio-temporo-spectral searchlight Representational Similarity Analysis, and leveraged directional representational modeling complemented by ridge-regression decoding. We first identified the necessary computational substrate for stability predictive reconfigurations: the spatio-temporo-spectral patterns encoding task (Target, Distractor) and conflict-expectancy (LWPC, ISPC) representations, the latter representations encoded already in the pre-stimulus windows. Crucially, conflict expectations modulated Target and Distractor encoding strength with distinct spatio-temporal and spectral dynamics, revealing a functional dissociation. LWPC-induced proactive stability follows a "Target-first" policy, primarily strengthening the Target early post-stimulus via Alpha and lower-Beta patterns, weakening Distractor encoding only later on; conversely, ISPC-induced predictive reactive stability follows a "Distractor-first" policy, rapidly weakening Distractor encoding via response-locked posterior Beta patterns, strengthening the Target only downstream. Our study refines theoretical cognitive control models, incorporating a mechanistic explanation for predictive stability, while also establishing a multidimensional methodological template for interrogating the underlying substrates of adaptive behavior and beyond.
ER  -