Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 28 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0PLOS One

Pain, sensory acceptability, and treatment compliance following cryotherapy and topical anesthetics in children: A randomized clinical trial

  1. 1Ondokuz Mayıs University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Samsun, Türkiye

Abstract

This randomized clinical trial aimed to compare the effects of cryotherapy, anesthetic spray, and gel on pain, anxiety, physiological responses, taste acceptability, and treatment compliance in children aged 7–10 years undergoing their first dental treatment. 100 healthy children were randomly allocated into four groups: 10% lidocaine spray, 20% benzocaine gel, cryotherapy with distilled water cooled to +4 °C, and lidocaine spray cooled to +4 °C. Following topical application, buccal infiltration anesthesia was administered. Anxiety, pain, and physiological responses were assessed using the Modified Dental Anxiety Scale and Facial Image Scale, Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale, and pulse-oximeter. Taste acceptability and treatment compliance were evaluated using a three-point Hedonic Scale and the FRANKL Scale. Repeated Measures ANOVA, Mann-Whitney U, and Kruskal-Wallis tests were applied. No significant differences were observed among the groups in anxiety, pain, pulse rate, oxygen saturation, or taste acceptability (p > 0.05). Pulse rate increased from the pre-operative to the post-operative period in all groups (p = 0.006), with no significant group × time interaction. FRANKL scores were significantly higher in the cryotherapy-distilled water group compared with the gel and cooled-spray groups (p = 0.001), a finding considered exploratory. Pain and anxiety outcomes following cryotherapy did not differ significantly from those of the topical anesthetic agents, while treatment compliance was higher, suggesting that cryotherapy may be a promising non-pharmacological option, pending confirmation in non-inferiority trials. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT07198022

Related

  1. Feasibility and acceptability of a randomized controlled trial of a patient-centred transition program for stroke survivors and their caregivers—P-NAVISTROKE study
    Marion Delvallée, Apolline Blazer, Mathilde Marchal +5
    Disability and RehabilitationPeer-reviewedLicence not statedGeneral biologyEpidemiology & public healthHAL
  2. F-OGS, a new “Follow-up Onco-Geriatric Screening” tool during the follow-up of older patients undergoing oncological treatment. Pilot study of feasibility and acceptability
    Simon Valero, Anaïs Fazilleau, Joe de Keizer +5
    Journal of Geriatric OncologyPeer-reviewedLicence not stated1 citedGeneral biologyOncologyHAL
  3. Variability among large language models in assessing CONSORT compliance of published randomized clinical trials
    Daniel Y. Tsybulnik, Justin J. Gillette, Thomas F. Heston
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textImmunologyStatisticsPLOS
  4. SOFTPEERS: feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effectiveness of a peer-led intervention to prevent binge drinking in adolescents. Results from a mixed-methods pilot cluster-randomized controlled trial
    Florence Cousson-Gélie, Olivier Lareyre, Emilie Charton +10
    Frontiers in Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral biologyEpidemiology & public healthHALHAL
  5. Predicted choice and acceptability of regimens for tuberculosis preventive treatment among people living with HIV in Uganda – A discrete choice experiment
    Hélène E. Aschmann, Allan Musinguzi, Jillian L. Kadota +11
    PLOS Global Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textImmunologyMicrobiologyPLOS
BibTeX
@article{cetin2026pain,
  title = {{Pain, sensory acceptability, and treatment compliance following cryotherapy and topical anesthetics in children: A randomized clinical trial}},
  author = {Emine Zehra Aydın Çetin and Bilal Özmen},
  journal = {PLOS One},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0362074},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0362074},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Pain, sensory acceptability, and treatment compliance following cryotherapy and topical anesthetics in children: A randomized clinical trial
AU  - Emine Zehra Aydın Çetin
AU  - Bilal Özmen
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/03
JO  - PLOS One
DO  - 10.1371/journal.pone.0362074
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0362074
AB  - This randomized clinical trial aimed to compare the effects of cryotherapy, anesthetic spray, and gel on pain, anxiety, physiological responses, taste acceptability, and treatment compliance in children aged 7–10 years undergoing their first dental treatment. 100 healthy children were randomly allocated into four groups: 10% lidocaine spray, 20% benzocaine gel, cryotherapy with distilled water cooled to +4 °C, and lidocaine spray cooled to +4 °C. Following topical application, buccal infiltration anesthesia was administered. Anxiety, pain, and physiological responses were assessed using the Modified Dental Anxiety Scale and Facial Image Scale, Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale, and pulse-oximeter. Taste acceptability and treatment compliance were evaluated using a three-point Hedonic Scale and the FRANKL Scale. Repeated Measures ANOVA, Mann-Whitney U, and Kruskal-Wallis tests were applied. No significant differences were observed among the groups in anxiety, pain, pulse rate, oxygen saturation, or taste acceptability (p > 0.05). Pulse rate increased from the pre-operative to the post-operative period in all groups (p = 0.006), with no significant group × time interaction. FRANKL scores were significantly higher in the cryotherapy-distilled water group compared with the gel and cooled-spray groups (p = 0.001), a finding considered exploratory. Pain and anxiety outcomes following cryotherapy did not differ significantly from those of the topical anesthetic agents, while treatment compliance was higher, suggesting that cryotherapy may be a promising non-pharmacological option, pending confirmation in non-inferiority trials. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT07198022
SN  - 1932-6203
ER  -