Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,948 studies31 sourcesUpdated 11 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Frontiers in Oncology

Can the prognostic nutritional index predict survival in patients with gastric and esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma?

  1. 1Department of Surgical Oncology, Ankara Etlik City Hospital
  2. 2Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Health Sciences Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital
  3. 3Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, University of Health Sciences Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of the preoperative Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the data from 300 patients undergoing curative gastrectomy at Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital between January 2013 and 2021. We calculated PNI using the formula: PNI = (10 × serum albumin [g/dL]) + (0.005 × total lymphocyte count). Using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, we determined the optimal PNI cut-off value as 45.83 and subsequently stratified patients into two groups: those with PNI ≥ 45.83 and those with PNI < 45.83. We then evaluated overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) using the Kaplan–Meier method.

Results: Our findings showed that patients with PNI < 45.83 had significantly shorter OS and DFS compared to those with PNI ≥ 45.83 (OS: 42 months vs. 90 months; DFS: 39 months vs. 84 months; p < 0.001). The multivariate analysis demonstrated low PNI, advanced T-stage, a higher number of metastatic lymph nodes, and Bormann type 3 tumors to be independent negative prognostic factors for both OS and DFS.

Conclusions: Low preoperative PNI was associated with poorer OS and DFS in patients with gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. PNI may contribute to preoperative risk assessment; however, prospective validation is required before its routine clinical use.

Related

  1. Prognostic impact of neoadjuvant therapy and nomogram development in early-stage and locally advanced Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction based on the SEER database
    Pubo Shi, Pengjie Yang, Xingfu Ban +2
    Journal of thoracic diseasePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Pretreatment Prognostic Nutritional Index Is Associated with Treatment Response and Survival in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Receiving CAR-T Cell Therapy
    Zhengyuan Han, Yadi Zhong, Zijian Lv +2
    NutrientsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textOncologyCrossrefEurope PMC
  3. Impact of postoperative chemotherapy in patients resected for esophagogastric adenocarcinoma with major pathological response after preoperative chemotherapy: a study from the FREGAT database
    Laure Corazzin, Elodie Jeanbert, Olivier Glehen +26
    Therapeutic Advances in Medical OncologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral biologySurgery & anaesthesiaHAL
  4. Prognostic Modeling of Lysosomal Cell Death Signatures in Lung Adenocarcinoma: A Machine Learning Framework for Survival Outcome Prediction
    Runzhe Wang, Qingtao Zhao, Shicheng Liu +5
    International Journal of GenomicsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textOncologyPMC
  5. Neoadjuvant toripalimab plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: a phase II trial
    Yongheng Li, Rongxu Du, Jianhao Geng +25
    BMC MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Surgery & anaesthesiaCrossref
BibTeX
@article{sagdıc2026prognostic,
  title = {{Can the prognostic nutritional index predict survival in patients with gastric and esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma?}},
  author = {Mehmet Furkan Sağdıç and Burak Dinçer and Güldeniz Argun and Ahmet Karayiğit and Cihangir Özaslan},
  journal = {Frontiers in Oncology},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3389/fonc.2026.1872975},
  url = {https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2026.1872975/full},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Can the prognostic nutritional index predict survival in patients with gastric and esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma?
AU  - Mehmet Furkan Sağdıç
AU  - Burak Dinçer
AU  - Güldeniz Argun
AU  - Ahmet Karayiğit
AU  - Cihangir Özaslan
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/22
JO  - Frontiers in Oncology
DO  - 10.3389/fonc.2026.1872975
UR  - https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2026.1872975/full
AB  - Background: This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of the preoperative Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.  Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the data from 300 patients undergoing curative gastrectomy at Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital between January 2013 and 2021. We calculated PNI using the formula: PNI = (10 × serum albumin [g/dL]) + (0.005 × total lymphocyte count). Using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, we determined the optimal PNI cut-off value as 45.83 and subsequently stratified patients into two groups: those with PNI ≥ 45.83 and those with PNI < 45.83. We then evaluated overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) using the Kaplan–Meier method.  Results: Our findings showed that patients with PNI < 45.83 had significantly shorter OS and DFS compared to those with PNI ≥ 45.83 (OS: 42 months vs. 90 months; DFS: 39 months vs. 84 months; p < 0.001). The multivariate analysis demonstrated low PNI, advanced T-stage, a higher number of metastatic lymph nodes, and Bormann type 3 tumors to be independent negative prognostic factors for both OS and DFS.  Conclusions: Low preoperative PNI was associated with poorer OS and DFS in patients with gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. PNI may contribute to preoperative risk assessment; however, prospective validation is required before its routine clinical use.
SN  - 2234-943X
ER  -