Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 14 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Optimization over covariance matrices with a parameterized metric

Abstract

The choice of Riemannian metric can strongly influence the convergence of gradient-based optimization over covariance matrices. Euclidean, Bures-Wasserstein and affine-invariant metrics are common choices, but their relative effectiveness depends on the objective. We introduce a two-parameter family defined by XpLXq+XqLXp=U, solved for L at each tangent vector U, that contains all three as exact members, at (0,0), (1,0) and (1,1), and extends past them. We treat the choice of member as a particular way of preconditioning for a given problem. To this end, we analyze the conditioning of the Riemannian Hessian at the solution. We show that it obeys a lower bound that depends on (p,q) only through the exponent r=p+q. When the Euclidean Hessian is a pure power that mixes no eigendirections, the member p=q=r/2 attains that bound, and a closed-form criterion identifies the other members that do. We discuss ways to tune r for a given problem. Experiments on real covariance data confirm the predicted conditioning and the benefit of tuning r. A task covariance example shows a further gain from tuning the shape.

Related

  1. Noise-Robust Distributed Optimization Over Directed Graphs With Row Stochastic Matrices
    Yifan Wang, Mufeng Wang, Xianghui Cao
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  2. A Note on the NP-Hardness on Quadratic Optimization over Doubly Stochastic Matrices and the Gromov-Wasserstein Problem
    Yong Sheng Soh
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textGeometry & topologyOptimisation & controlarXiv
  3. Eigenvector distributions and optimal shrinkage estimators for large covariance and precision matrices
    Xiucai Ding, Yun Li, Fan Yang
    Applied and Computational Harmonic AnalysisPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text19 citedStatisticsOpenAlex
  4. The Zero Pattern of a Design Matrix Drives Multiple Descent in Over-parameterized Regression
    Kevin Han Huang, Haoyu Ye, Somak Laha +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  5. Tracy Widom law for sample covariance matrices under quadratic form concentration
    Guangchen Chen, Xing Lyu
    arXivPreprintCC0Full textMathematical physicsProbabilityarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{li2026optimization,
  title = {{Optimization over covariance matrices with a parameterized metric}},
  author = {Yibang Li and Bamdev Mishra and Pratik Jawanpuria and Cyrus Mostajeran},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.17089},
  eprint = {2609.17089},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.17089},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Optimization over covariance matrices with a parameterized metric
AU  - Yibang Li
AU  - Bamdev Mishra
AU  - Pratik Jawanpuria
AU  - Cyrus Mostajeran
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/15
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.17089
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.17089
AB  - The choice of Riemannian metric can strongly influence the convergence of gradient-based optimization over covariance matrices. Euclidean, Bures-Wasserstein and affine-invariant metrics are common choices, but their relative effectiveness depends on the objective. We introduce a two-parameter family defined by X^pLX^q+X^qLX^p=U, solved for L at each tangent vector U, that contains all three as exact members, at (0,0), (1,0) and (1,1), and extends past them. We treat the choice of member as a particular way of preconditioning for a given problem. To this end, we analyze the conditioning of the Riemannian Hessian at the solution. We show that it obeys a lower bound that depends on (p,q) only through the exponent r=p+q. When the Euclidean Hessian is a pure power that mixes no eigendirections, the member p=q=r/2 attains that bound, and a closed-form criterion identifies the other members that do. We discuss ways to tune r for a given problem. Experiments on real covariance data confirm the predicted conditioning and the benefit of tuning r. A task covariance example shows a further gain from tuning the shape.
ER  -