Comparative Effectiveness of Digital Exercise-Based Interventions for Improving Balance in Older Adults: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis With GRADE Certainty of Evidence.
4 affiliations
- 1School of Physical Education and Sports Science, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
- 2Guangzhou Sport University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
- 3School of Football, Hainan Normal University, Haikou, Hainan, China.
- 4College of Physical Education, Quanzhou Normal University, Main Campus: No. 398, Donghai Street, Fengze District, Quanzhou, Fujian, 362000, China, 86 18669866186.
Abstract
Background
Technology-based rehabilitation is increasingly used for balance training in older adults. A 2023 network meta-analysis (NMA) found only exergaming with motion capture superior to no treatment; however, the evidence has since expanded, and no GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) appraisal has been applied.Objective
This study aimed to update the comparative effectiveness of 5 technology categories-exergaming with balance platforms (EBP), exergaming with motion capture (EMC), other serious games, interventions with wearables, and telerehabilitation (Tele)-versus conventional exercise (CE), and no treatment (NT), applying GRADE adapted for NMA.Methods
A systematic search of 4 databases from inception through April 2025, with an identical supplementary update search to January 31, 2026, identified 60 randomized controlled trials (N=3469; mean age 73.1, SD 5.2; range 63.3-86.2 y). Fifty-seven trials (2758 analyzed participants) contributed to 4 prespecified networks (all balance, functional scales, Timed Up and Go [TUG] test, and gait speed). A random-effects NMA was fitted using multivariate meta-regression. Treatment hierarchies were summarized by the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) and the probability of being best; certainty of evidence was rated with GRADE adapted for NMA.Results
In the all-balance network, Tele (standardized mean difference [SMD] 0.69, 95% CI 0.08-1.29; P=.03), EBP (SMD 0.63, 95% CI 0.31-0.95; P<.001), EMC (SMD 0.58, 95% CI 0.22-0.95; P=.002), and CE (SMD 0.35, 95% CI 0.03-0.68; P=.03) were superior to NT, with consistent findings in the TUG network (EBP 0.81, 95% CI 0.42-1.20; Tele 0.82, 95% CI 0.16-1.49; EMC 0.79, 95% CI 0.36-1.21; all P<.05). Tele ranked first by SUCRA (76.3%), but its probability of being best was only approximately 41%, and the estimate rested on 5 trials (n=198). No technology-based intervention was superior to CE in any network. Certainty of evidence was moderate for EBP versus NT and EMC versus NT in the TUG network only; the 37 other comparisons were low or very low. Dropout did not differ between technology-based and control arms (odds ratio 1.10, 95% CI 0.87-1.40; P=.41).Conclusions
Tele, EBP, and EMC were each associated with improved balance versus NT, although none exceeded CE. The first-place SUCRA ranking of Tele is preliminary. Certainty was moderate only for EBP and EMC versus NT on the TUG test; the remaining evidence is too uncertain for firm clinical recommendations. As no included trial reported falls, these findings are not direct evidence of fall prevention. Larger trials with standardized comparator intensity and posttraining follow-up are required.
Related
- Comparative effectiveness of exercise and self-management interventions delivered through different modes of digital support on pain and patient-reported physical function in people with knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
- Phase-specific comparative effectiveness of local epistaxis interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Are Asymmetry-Focused Training Interventions More Effective than General Programs in Reducing Interlimb Asymmetries and Improving Athletic Performance? A Systematic Review
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of non-pharmacological interventions in improving psychological status and sleep quality among hemodialysis patients
- Comparative effectiveness of digital health interventions for low back pain: systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
BibTeX
@article{li2026comparative,
title = {{Comparative Effectiveness of Digital Exercise-Based Interventions for Improving Balance in Older Adults: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis With GRADE Certainty of Evidence.}},
author = {Fangbo Li and Xuecheng Li and Qingfang Li and Xiaoqin Gong and Kexin Shi and Yongyu Huang and Xiaowei Feng and Dong Zhang},
journal = {JMIR aging},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.2196/101231},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42954170},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Comparative Effectiveness of Digital Exercise-Based Interventions for Improving Balance in Older Adults: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis With GRADE Certainty of Evidence.
AU - Fangbo Li
AU - Xuecheng Li
AU - Qingfang Li
AU - Xiaoqin Gong
AU - Kexin Shi
AU - Yongyu Huang
AU - Xiaowei Feng
AU - Dong Zhang
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/01
JO - JMIR aging
DO - 10.2196/101231
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42954170
AB - Background Technology-based rehabilitation is increasingly used for balance training in older adults. A 2023 network meta-analysis (NMA) found only exergaming with motion capture superior to no treatment; however, the evidence has since expanded, and no GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) appraisal has been applied.Objective This study aimed to update the comparative effectiveness of 5 technology categories-exergaming with balance platforms (EBP), exergaming with motion capture (EMC), other serious games, interventions with wearables, and telerehabilitation (Tele)-versus conventional exercise (CE), and no treatment (NT), applying GRADE adapted for NMA.Methods A systematic search of 4 databases from inception through April 2025, with an identical supplementary update search to January 31, 2026, identified 60 randomized controlled trials (N=3469; mean age 73.1, SD 5.2; range 63.3-86.2 y). Fifty-seven trials (2758 analyzed participants) contributed to 4 prespecified networks (all balance, functional scales, Timed Up and Go [TUG] test, and gait speed). A random-effects NMA was fitted using multivariate meta-regression. Treatment hierarchies were summarized by the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) and the probability of being best; certainty of evidence was rated with GRADE adapted for NMA.Results In the all-balance network, Tele (standardized mean difference [SMD] 0.69, 95% CI 0.08-1.29; P=.03), EBP (SMD 0.63, 95% CI 0.31-0.95; P<.001), EMC (SMD 0.58, 95% CI 0.22-0.95; P=.002), and CE (SMD 0.35, 95% CI 0.03-0.68; P=.03) were superior to NT, with consistent findings in the TUG network (EBP 0.81, 95% CI 0.42-1.20; Tele 0.82, 95% CI 0.16-1.49; EMC 0.79, 95% CI 0.36-1.21; all P<.05). Tele ranked first by SUCRA (76.3%), but its probability of being best was only approximately 41%, and the estimate rested on 5 trials (n=198). No technology-based intervention was superior to CE in any network. Certainty of evidence was moderate for EBP versus NT and EMC versus NT in the TUG network only; the 37 other comparisons were low or very low. Dropout did not differ between technology-based and control arms (odds ratio 1.10, 95% CI 0.87-1.40; P=.41).Conclusions Tele, EBP, and EMC were each associated with improved balance versus NT, although none exceeded CE. The first-place SUCRA ranking of Tele is preliminary. Certainty was moderate only for EBP and EMC versus NT on the TUG test; the remaining evidence is too uncertain for firm clinical recommendations. As no included trial reported falls, these findings are not direct evidence of fall prevention. Larger trials with standardized comparator intensity and posttraining follow-up are required.
SN - 2561-7605
ER -