Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
182,469 studies31 sourcesUpdated 25 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Mathematical AI Predicts 40% and 57% Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness Against H1N1 and H3N2, Respectively, for the 2026--2027 U.S. Season

Abstract

Background: Clinical influenza vaccine effectiveness (VE) has often been low over the past two decades, highlighting the need for preseason VE forecasting. Timely forecasts could help health authorities plan prevention strategies and allocate healthcare resources. However, preseason forecasting of clinical influenza VE remains relatively uncommon. Methods: We obtained hemagglutinin (HA) sequences from GISAID for U.S. specimens collected in August--September before each influenza season from 2010--2011 through 2024--2025. After quality screening, we compared each virus with the corresponding vaccine target strain for the same season and subtype or lineage using two mathematical distances based on amino acid patterns in the HA protein. We calculated mean distances for each season and subtype or lineage and paired them with published clinical VE estimates, yielding 26 observations across 13 seasons. Using a mathematical AI approach, we fitted linear regression models of VE against each distance and evaluated their predictive performance by forecasting later seasons using data from earlier seasons, with the historical mean VE for each subtype or lineage as a reference. We then applied the same approach to 87 HA sequences collected in August--September 2026 to forecast VE for the 2026--2027 season. Results: We generated component-specific forecasts of influenza VE for the upcoming 2026--2027 U.S. season. Both mathematical distances were negatively associated with historical VE, indicating that greater differences between circulating viruses and vaccine strains were associated with lower VE. The topological model forecast VE of 40.3%, 56.9%, and 47.1% against A(H1N1)pdm09, A(H3N2), and B/Victoria, respectively, whereas the geometric model forecast corresponding VE values of 34.0%, 56.8%, and 51.1%.

Related

  1. The Effectiveness of Discovery Learning on Mathematical Reflective Thinking Skills Based on the Level of Learning Independence of High School Students
    Ipat, Hepsi Nindiasari, Syamsuri
    Kreano: Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-InovatifPeer-reviewedCC BY-SAFull textGeneral mathematicsDOAJ
  2. Mathematical folklore
    Govind Menon, Akshay Venkatesh
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textGeneral mathematicsarXiv
  3. Digital Learning Platforms and Mathematical Problem-Solving Ability: The Moderating Role of Self-Regulated Learning
    Joseph Hamenu, Isaac Davor
    European Journal of Mathematics and Science EducationPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text5 citedGeneral mathematicsOpenAlex
  4. Hanslick's Musical Formalism as a Mathematical Structure - Examining meaning in Music through the Lens of Category Theory
    Ilyas Khan
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAlgebra & number theoryarXiv
  5. Mathematical Classification of Switching Types and Hierarchical Structures: Three Switching Types, Six Hierarchical Structures, Coefficient of Variation Lower Bound, and Discretization Plateau Effect in the k-Regime Linear Switching Model
    Shuiping Tang
    Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)PreprintLicence not stated6 citedStatisticsOpenAlex
BibTeX
@misc{wang2026mathematical,
  title = {{Mathematical AI Predicts 40% and 57% Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness Against H1N1 and H3N2, Respectively, for the 2026--2027 U.S. Season}},
  author = {Xiang Xiang Wang and Guo-Wei Wei},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.31301},
  eprint = {2610.31301},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.31301},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Mathematical AI Predicts 40% and 57% Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness Against H1N1 and H3N2, Respectively, for the 2026--2027 U.S. Season
AU  - Xiang Xiang Wang
AU  - Guo-Wei Wei
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/22
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.31301
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.31301
AB  - Background: Clinical influenza vaccine effectiveness (VE) has often been low over the past two decades, highlighting the need for preseason VE forecasting. Timely forecasts could help health authorities plan prevention strategies and allocate healthcare resources. However, preseason forecasting of clinical influenza VE remains relatively uncommon. Methods: We obtained hemagglutinin (HA) sequences from GISAID for U.S. specimens collected in August--September before each influenza season from 2010--2011 through 2024--2025. After quality screening, we compared each virus with the corresponding vaccine target strain for the same season and subtype or lineage using two mathematical distances based on amino acid patterns in the HA protein. We calculated mean distances for each season and subtype or lineage and paired them with published clinical VE estimates, yielding 26 observations across 13 seasons. Using a mathematical AI approach, we fitted linear regression models of VE against each distance and evaluated their predictive performance by forecasting later seasons using data from earlier seasons, with the historical mean VE for each subtype or lineage as a reference. We then applied the same approach to 87 HA sequences collected in August--September 2026 to forecast VE for the 2026--2027 season. Results: We generated component-specific forecasts of influenza VE for the upcoming 2026--2027 U.S. season. Both mathematical distances were negatively associated with historical VE, indicating that greater differences between circulating viruses and vaccine strains were associated with lower VE. The topological model forecast VE of 40.3%, 56.9%, and 47.1% against A(H1N1)pdm09, A(H3N2), and B/Victoria, respectively, whereas the geometric model forecast corresponding VE values of 34.0%, 56.8%, and 51.1%.
ER  -