Effectiveness of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Compared with Basic Health Education for Tobacco Cessation: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Background: Tobacco use remains one of the leading preventable causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) and basic health education (BHE) are widely used behavioural interventions for smoking cessation, but their comparative effectiveness has not been comprehensively synthesized. This systematic review evaluated whether CBT is more effective than BHE in improving smoking cessation outcomes among adult smokers. Methods: Following a registered PROSPERO protocol (CRD420251131784) and PRISMA 2020 guidelines, randomized and controlled trials comparing CBT with BHE or usual care were included. Smoking abstinence was the primary outcome, while reduction in cigarette consumption, nicotine dependence, cognition, and self-efficacy were secondary outcomes. Results: Twenty-two studies met the eligibility criteria. Most studies reported higher smoking abstinence rates, greater reductions in nicotine dependence, and improved self-efficacy with CBT compared with BHE, particularly when CBT was intensive or combined with pharmacotherapy. However, heterogeneity in intervention intensity, participant characteristics, and outcome measures limited direct comparison across studies. Some studies found no significant differences between interventions, especially where nicotine replacement therapy was provided to all participants. Conclusions: Overall, the available evidence suggests that CBT is generally more effective than BHE in promoting tobacco cessation, although further high-quality studies using standardized intervention protocols and outcome measures are needed.
Related
- Implementation Outcomes and Effectiveness of a Personalized Single Session Cognitive Behavioral Intervention for Depression and Anxiety
- Rehabilitative efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy-based intervention for chronic fatigue syndrome : A systematic review and meta-analysis
- The effect of cognitive behavioral therapy for sleep and glycemic outcomes in people with diabetes : A systematic review and meta-analysis
- Identifying Message "Recipes" for High Perceived Effectiveness: Cognitive, Social, and Emotional Profiles of Vaping Public Education Messages Among Young Adults Who Vape
- Education as a Proxy for Cognitive Reserve, and Its Moderating Role in the Amyloid–Cognition Relationship Across the Alzheimer’s Continuum: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
BibTeX
@article{raj2026effectiveness,
title = {{Effectiveness of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Compared with Basic Health Education for Tobacco Cessation: A Systematic Review}},
author = {Gagan Raj and Ankita Jain},
journal = {International Journal of Preventive Medicine},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.4103/ijpvm.ijpvm_373_25},
url = {https://doi.org/10.4103/ijpvm.ijpvm_373_25},
note = {CC BY-NC-SA},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Effectiveness of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Compared with Basic Health Education for Tobacco Cessation: A Systematic Review
AU - Gagan Raj
AU - Ankita Jain
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/01
JO - International Journal of Preventive Medicine
DO - 10.4103/ijpvm.ijpvm_373_25
UR - https://doi.org/10.4103/ijpvm.ijpvm_373_25
AB - Background: Tobacco use remains one of the leading preventable causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) and basic health education (BHE) are widely used behavioural interventions for smoking cessation, but their comparative effectiveness has not been comprehensively synthesized. This systematic review evaluated whether CBT is more effective than BHE in improving smoking cessation outcomes among adult smokers. Methods: Following a registered PROSPERO protocol (CRD420251131784) and PRISMA 2020 guidelines, randomized and controlled trials comparing CBT with BHE or usual care were included. Smoking abstinence was the primary outcome, while reduction in cigarette consumption, nicotine dependence, cognition, and self-efficacy were secondary outcomes. Results: Twenty-two studies met the eligibility criteria. Most studies reported higher smoking abstinence rates, greater reductions in nicotine dependence, and improved self-efficacy with CBT compared with BHE, particularly when CBT was intensive or combined with pharmacotherapy. However, heterogeneity in intervention intensity, participant characteristics, and outcome measures limited direct comparison across studies. Some studies found no significant differences between interventions, especially where nicotine replacement therapy was provided to all participants. Conclusions: Overall, the available evidence suggests that CBT is generally more effective than BHE in promoting tobacco cessation, although further high-quality studies using standardized intervention protocols and outcome measures are needed.
SN - 2008-7802
SN - 2008-8213
ER -