Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,948 studies31 sourcesUpdated 27 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Nature Communications

Quantifying parks as preventive health assets using population-scale mobility data

Abstract

Urban parks are promoted as preventive health assets, but cities lack park-level evidence linking real-world use to investment feasibility. Here we combine anonymized mobile-phone data covering 1.79 million park visits by 320,000 users with records for 4139 parks, land prices and population across Greater Tokyo. We estimate walking-related preventive health benefits and compare them with land, construction and maintenance costs in 2019 Japanese yen. We show that benefits decline with residential distance within about seven kilometres, while park type mainly changes their level. Returns are highly uneven and concentrated among small parks: about 16% of block parks recover costs within 20 years, whereas large destination parks rarely do so when only walking-related benefits are counted. Planning estimates suggest different siting strategies for the two smallest park classes. This framework offers cities a transparent way to compare projected walking-related health returns and screen investments under land and budget constraints.

Related

  1. Urban Mobility and Population Health in The Hague: A Multi-Scale Analysis
    H. Muizelaar, M. R. Haas, R. C. Vos +5
    medRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textEpidemiology & public healthmedRxiv
  2. Assets and health across the lifecourse: a framework for supporting migrant populations.
    Catherine K Ettman, Isabel T Galea, Salma M Abdalla
    Journal of migration and healthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textPsychiatry & mental healthEurope PMC
  3. The Intersection of Psychological Distress, Cardiovascular Health, and Allostatic Load in Occupational Settings: Implications for Preventive Medicine, Occupational Health, and Clinical Management
    Eunice Kwan Chae Park, Woo Hyun Park, Eun-Young Jeon
    Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Health literacy and preventive behaviors against PM2.5 exposure among residents in a Thai Province: a cross-sectional study
    Kanokporn Somporn, Nutticha Dungkokkruad, Rungnapa Phukphila +2
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Pharmacology & toxicologyCrossref
  5. A pilot evaluation of a preventive intervention to support mental health among dementia caregivers: a controlled longitudinal study
    Łukasz Wieczorek, Agnieszka Borzym, Ludwika Gawryś +2
    BMC Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Psychiatry & mental healthCrossref
BibTeX
@article{su2026quantifying,
  title = {{Quantifying parks as preventive health assets using population-scale mobility data}},
  author = {Hang Su and Wenjing Li and Sheng Li and Shuisong Ke and Haoran Zhang},
  journal = {Nature Communications},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1038/s41467-026-78106-7},
  url = {https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-026-78106-7},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Quantifying parks as preventive health assets using population-scale mobility data
AU  - Hang Su
AU  - Wenjing Li
AU  - Sheng Li
AU  - Shuisong Ke
AU  - Haoran Zhang
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/05
JO  - Nature Communications
DO  - 10.1038/s41467-026-78106-7
UR  - https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-026-78106-7
AB  - Urban parks are promoted as preventive health assets, but cities lack park-level evidence linking real-world use to investment feasibility. Here we combine anonymized mobile-phone data covering 1.79 million park visits by 320,000 users with records for 4139 parks, land prices and population across Greater Tokyo. We estimate walking-related preventive health benefits and compare them with land, construction and maintenance costs in 2019 Japanese yen. We show that benefits decline with residential distance within about seven kilometres, while park type mainly changes their level. Returns are highly uneven and concentrated among small parks: about 16% of block parks recover costs within 20 years, whereas large destination parks rarely do so when only walking-related benefits are counted. Planning estimates suggest different siting strategies for the two smallest park classes. This framework offers cities a transparent way to compare projected walking-related health returns and screen investments under land and budget constraints.
SN  - 2041-1723
ER  -